"The last screenshot is from Alza.sk, they had prices listed at 264 EUR for 4GB version and 302 EUR for 8GB model."
Not sure what taxes are like in Slovakia, but if that's the price for DE market as well, I'm rather disappointed. Not that much about that I have to pay a bit more, but that AMD would not use GIANT opportunity to re-gain large swaths of the market because someone is allowed to do silly 20€-ish margin increase.
When people are pissed off with nvidia doing ngreedia, show how you are different!
There are no facts in this thread. It's all rumours and FUD.
For starters, there are indeed facts in this thread, e.g.: "AMD announced RX 480 4Gb to start at 199$".
As far as rumors go, they should come from somewhere, besides poster's head (or arse).
When poster makes it up, it's a different kind of rumor.
And when it's clearly targeted, it's FUD.
This is not confirmed, they just gave link to wccf archive with rumor of 1,5k mhz overclock
Yeah, likely fake. Sapphire's official page has no reference to that FB account either.
the most important is that AMD shares rise up!
Insane that one could have trippled his savings within one year just with AMD stock.
And heck, back then, when nobody knew how good or bad Polaris would be (we still don't know what Zen will be TBH), even then it was not THAT big of a gamble, as in the worst cases someone would have bought the company.
PS
Intel:
Revenue: 50 billion $, market capitalization 150 billion $ (3 times revenue)
nVidia:
Revenue: 5 billion $, market capitalization 25 billion $ (5 times revenue)
AMD:
Revenue: 4 billion $, market capitalization 4.5-5 billion $ (1 - 1.1 times revenue)
I'm rather new to this, but either nVidia is overpriced or Intel should cost more.
Oh, that and huge growth potential for AMD if both Polaris & Zen deliver.
can we all just wait 8 days for the NDA to lift come on enough guesswork its time for SCIENCE
Thanks for your valuable contribution to this thread, but can you stop posting for 8 days, to let people who don't mind rumors... be?
More AMD news: Dual 480 @$500 beats 1080@$700
IMO that's only interesting if VR really benefits from dual GPU.
Other than that, it isn't really attractive comparison at all as, besides consuming more power/generating more heat you are likely to run into all sorts of problem in various games with dual GPU config.
Gotta love people that nit pick things. The gougers are the *(@#&#(@ that are tring to sell a 650$ card for 1200+$. Stop being an idiot.
Maybe it's time to pull your head from wherever it is and check the facts, instead of insulting opponents?
789€ is the price announced by nVidia and that's exactly the price I see in shops:
http://www.mindfactory.de/Hardware/Grafikkarten+(VGA)/GeForce+GTX+fuer+Gaming/GTX+1080.html
Just wondering, the picture shows the fins on the heatsink in a vertical alignment, but shouldn't they mount 90 degrees to that for air flow to have a clean path out the rear vents?
Not sure I get you. Fins create higher pressure inside the card, low pressure outside the card, near the fins, the only place where air can get out to even out the pressure is on the other side.