AMD Ryzen Benchmarks Leaked - Amazing Multi-core and Single-core Performance

[xenocide]

I'll believe it when TPU does their benchmark--or someone reputable. I remember people shouting me down for being skeptical of Bulldozer before it launched, but I was spot on to do so. AMD's leaks are always very generous...

 

[Melvis]

Software based physics. Havok to be exact.



Yea, Guru only uses AMD slides in their reviews as results (Fury X), and AMD employees post in their comments (AMD Roy). Any site is better than Guru3D for hardware reviews.

So nothing to do with there CPU reviews? excellent! and does anyone remembered JF_AMD on our forums?

 

[Jurassic1024]

So nothing to do with there CPU reviews? excellent! and does anyone remembered JF_AMD on our forums?

Not sure about the CPU reviews. After reading their Fury X review and FreeSync tests I gave up on them entirely.

 

[TheMailMan78]

Ill wait for Guru3D's results, the best and most none BIAS on the net!

Um @cadaveca isn't biased at all. I've known the guy for years and have personally seen his opinion change on brands. Love him or hate him you can't call his reviews biased. But, then again you are from Australia. Everything is upside down and backwards down there. Maybe you meant Guru3D is biased as we say in the upright world?

 

[Melvis]

Um @cadaveca isn't biased at all. I've known the guy for years and have personally seen his opinion change on brands. Love him or hate him you can't call his reviews biased. But, then again you are from Australia. Everything is upside down and backwards down there. Maybe you meant Guru3D is biased as we say in the upright world?

I didnt say he was! I have found over the past 10yrs that Guru3D's reviews when it comes to CPU's one of the best out there with a wide range of different tests and CPU's.

Really? your going to act like a child and go and say something stupid about where Im from? seriously? your an American right? far out were do i even begin!

 

[TheLaughingMan]

I don't know anything about Guru3D. I trust cadaveca because I know him personally and I know he is not bias at all. I cracked a joke about AMD not sending him stuff because he jokes about it and its true.

At least we call all agree that Anandtech is Intel bias through and through.

 

[BiggieShady]

At least we call all agree that Anandtech is Intel bias through and through.

Don't know what to think about Anandtech anymore since its now run by the same company that runs Tom's hardware, because Anand went to work for Apple.

 

[TheGuruStud]

Don't know what to think about Anandtech anymore since its now run by the same company that runs Tom's hardware, because Anand went to work for Apple.

Tom's was the same, but neither seem to get paychecks anymore since Intel won with their illegal tactics.

 

[rruff]

I'll believe it when TPU does their benchmark--or someone reputable. I remember people shouting me down for being skeptical of Bulldozer before it launched, but I was spot on to do so. AMD's leaks are always very generous...

For those who were paying attention when Bulldozer launched (I wasn't), were the leaks that far off this close to launch?

 

[Xzibit]

For those who were paying attention when Bulldozer launched (I wasn't), were the leaks that far off this close to launch?

No. People like to make it out like they were fooled, probably in their own heads. Plus anyone that equates 3rd hand leaks being by the company itself is really stretching it.

Leaks started happening around 6 months out and they were not looking good.

You can even look back to WCCFTech. If I remember right even WFFCTech called one of them "disappointing performance".

 

[medi01]

cinebench results "leak" (I can't see much on these pics, those who can look quite disappointed):

http://imgur.com/a/JaAtD:

 

[Johnny Utah]

if it doesn't wow us in the price department, it won't matter that it's so close to intel

 

[TheGuruStud]

No. People like to make it out like they were fooled, probably in their own heads. Plus anyone that equates 3rd hand leaks being by the company itself is really stretching it.

Leaks started happening around 6 months out and they were not looking good.

You can even look back to WCCFTech. If I remember right even WFFCTech called one of them "disappointing performance".

The leaks were actually worse than retail performance. People just make up shit in their heads after the fact.

 

[kruk]

cinebench results "leak" (I can't see much on these pics, those who can look quite disappointed):

http://imgur.com/a/JaAtD:

Uhm, how can they be disappointed with the imaginary data they got from these super pixelated images?

 

[TheGuruStud]

Uhm, how can they be disappointed with the imaginary data they got from these super pixelated images?

Didn't you see the imaginary Ryzen reviewer with pixelated images? Are you blind? Hype train cancelled. And don't you know that cinebench is the best benchmark ever? It's so good that Intel might as well own it.

Which AVX is it using?

 

[dalekdukesboy]

No links: FAKE NEWS. Sad!

Ha, this is funny! If I didn't know better...I'd say this is President Trump incognito taking a break from Twitter for a bit

 

[TheLaughingMan]

cinebench results "leak" (I can't see much on these pics, those who can look quite disappointed):

http://imgur.com/a/JaAtD:

I am so glad we have an image by a "PC user" who doesn't know how to screen cap, but can add artificial pixelation to let us know that he may have a Ryzen chip for review. I feel safe now.

 

[RealNeil]

CineBench picture

The leaks were actually worse than retail performance. People just make up shit in their heads after the fact.

Almost everyone was disappointed by BullDozer. I had plans for two systems back then. I waited for BD to pop and it was a bust. I bought parts for two i7-2600K systems instead.

I remember AMD firing almost all of their marketing team after BD launched.

Also, This from TechPowerUp at the time.

But I think that we should forget the forgettable and concentrate on RyZen. They're releasing some nice teasers and they are much more believable this time around.
I've already begun to save some cash for a Ryzen box.

 

[rruff]

Leaks started happening around 6 months out and they were not looking good.

So that's Bulldozer, Based on the leaks to this point, what do you expect from Ryzen?

Comparisons are mostly to the Intel server chips, where more cores and threads are a benefit. Maybe that is AMD's main target? They seem to have better performance overall and if the power consumption and pricing are as low as we've been told, that is a definite win for AMD. A big win too! Intel will definitely need to drop price on this range unless they can come up with something better in a hurry.

But Ryzen seems to be down on single core performance vs Intel for lower level CPUs. This is an arena where single thread speed tends to dominate, and few will see more than a rare benefit from >4 cores. I expect that in most applications (and games) Intel will still have a slight lead with the better i5s and i7s. AMD may force a little price adjustment on them, which would be great!

And I expect some refinement of Ryzen post launch, as was the case for Polaris. Meaning it will improve with better drivers and manufacturing.

 

[RealNeil]

If what we are being shown about Ryzen is true, I expect that it will give us a level of performance that may have been out of our reach until now. (some of us anyways)
With a little competition in the market, we will be the beneficiaries and that is a very good thing.

My expectations are for good gaming performance at a nice price. I really don't care if my Intel boxes beat it, I'll still gladly use it.
In fact, I just decided this week to send one of my X99 boxes to my son (the engineer) to use for rendering his robotics projects. This makes room in my gaming area for the new anticipated AMD box.

 

[Blueberries]

(Spoilers)

 

[TheGuruStud]

(Spoilers)

So... more or less the same given 6900s boost (and if you're assuming that ryzen was boosting)?

This is gonna be a long wait till NDA lift.

 

[medi01]

So... more or less the same given 6900s boost (and if you're assuming that ryzen was boosting)?

This is gonna be a long wait till NDA lift.

I still thing that we are seeing XFR-ing AMD CPUs. (it also explains why 95W rated chip consumes rougthly as much as 145W one), so AMD is still quite behind on IPC front (although quite on par on perf/watt)

 

[Super XP]

Not sure about the CPU reviews. After reading their Fury X review and FreeSync tests I gave up on them entirely.

FreeSync is awesome. Anybody buying a Monitor should make sure it has FreeSync.

 

[Super XP]

I still thing that we are seeing XFR-ing AMD CPUs. (it also explains why 95W rated chip consumes rougthly as much as 145W one), so AMD is still quite behind on IPC front (although quite on par on perf/watt)

The way I see it is Ryzen is a well designed CPU tech. Lower watts needed to run circles around its competition that require more power. Seeing various leaked benchmarks, Ryzen will end up being the top dog in IPC.

I'll believe it when TPU does their benchmark--or someone reputable. I remember people shouting me down for being skeptical of Bulldozer before it launched, but I was spot on to do so. AMD's leaks are always very generous...

Ryzen is no Bulldozer. This chip is built from the ground up, and Jim Keller had a hand in its design. Probably the worlds best CPU Architect. AMD is mounting a massive assault with Ryzen, and I can see them finally taking the Performance Crown off Intel,.