Well, the pattern is there:
1) publish unverified information from dubious sources as fact(s)
2) hope no one would notice or care enough to call TPU/btarnur out on it
3) if someone does, (pretend to) apologize, and optionally cite some lame excuse
4) actually learn nothing from the experience, and move on.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
The problem isn't that a mistake was made. That is a problem, not the problem. The bigger issue is that it keeps happening.
btarnur is indefensible:
- this was posted not as an editorial or an opinion piece, but as actual news, with no language indicating that the information presented may not be (at all) accurate;
- this was posted on TechPowerUp, which is a website that still has and tries to maintain some level of credibility and reputation (I assume);
- this was posted not by some random intern or newbie, but by the a senior member and editior, who has at least 12 years of experience (self-admitted).
Of course some people would assume btarnur has an agenda. The other option would mean he hasn't learned anything about journalism in 12 years! I'm not sure which would be worse of the two, both options look awful.
1) publish unverified information from dubious sources as fact(s)
2) hope no one would notice or care enough to call TPU/btarnur out on it
3) if someone does, (pretend to) apologize, and optionally cite some lame excuse
4) actually learn nothing from the experience, and move on.
Lather, rinse, repeat.
The problem isn't that a mistake was made. That is a problem, not the problem. The bigger issue is that it keeps happening.
btarnur is indefensible:
- this was posted not as an editorial or an opinion piece, but as actual news, with no language indicating that the information presented may not be (at all) accurate;
- this was posted on TechPowerUp, which is a website that still has and tries to maintain some level of credibility and reputation (I assume);
- this was posted not by some random intern or newbie, but by the a senior member and editior, who has at least 12 years of experience (self-admitted).
Of course some people would assume btarnur has an agenda. The other option would mean he hasn't learned anything about journalism in 12 years! I'm not sure which would be worse of the two, both options look awful.
Last edited: