Most of his reviews are well north of million of views, including his recent ones, so yeah i guess he still is, he is still one of the few that review games and paint a true picture without bias.
Yeah, I guess my definition of relevance exceeds the fact a channel has a few million subscribers. There are after all seven billion potential clicks to gather. Excluding dupe accounts or the infinite number of clicks we can give. Painting a 'true' picture? Because other reviewers don't? I guess you have to watch him to understand it (sounds familiar lately for so many of these influencers).
The man is a
brand, not a journalist of any sort. He's a brand that plays games and talks about it, and earns by advertising the same stuff. That goes for 99% of the tech YTers out there, none of them are really special in any way shape or form. Its entertainment before actual review, much like how a reality show is entertainment before being reality. This applies to AngryJoe more than it does for many other YTers with actual substance... I mean, what IS the substance of playing a game and talking about it? The man is extremely desperately trying to be and act funny, and apparently the super low bar of his comedy is acceptable to some. To be fair, I think this very topic has more substance than all of Angry's video's combined.
Strangely similar to TV: