- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 10,501 (1.71/day)
- Location
- Austin Texas
Processor | 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.4, 4.8Ghz Ring 190W PL1 |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI 690-I PRO |
Cooling | Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO |
Memory | 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 FE |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X |
Display(s) | Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED |
Case | Jonsbo Z20 |
Audio Device(s) | Yes |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 |
Mouse | Xlite V2 |
Keyboard | 65% HE Keyboard |
Software | Windows 11 |
Benchmark Scores | They're pretty good, nothing crazy. |
Right but the OP is about the fairness of the HWUB video....That is why it is called gaming CPU. For the price you pay for that one just for gaming, you get excellent performance for half the price of Intel's. You can also do other stuff with it as you please although a tad slower. I don't mind that considering the price.
They took a 14900K - which competes with a 7950X3D in price, and then only focused on gaming vs a 7800X3D, and declared it the super-ultimate winner with no Cons whatsoever.
They could have done the same video with a 14600K and come to the same conclusion - which is why that comparison is kind of skewed.
He also literally says "I tried to think of some cons of the 7800x3d and couldn't come up with any!" -- guy who failed a 7800x3d build on livestream due to motherboard/platform issues.