- Joined
- Jul 26, 2018
- Messages
- 6 (0.00/day)
It absolutely will, the cross-CCD latency penalty affects the current hybrid system and this is why AMD literally had to write a custom scheduler driver. Having dual X3D CCDs would correct this scheduling problem by nature of the processor. Ryzen currently lacks hardware thread scheduling capability of Alder and Raptor Lake.
The true reason we don't get dual X3D Ryzens is that AMD wants to protect their high-end server business. Processors with that much cache fetch thousands upon thousands on the EPYC segment.
And the only reason we didn't have ECC, VROC and other features as standard is 100% Intel's fault. Has always been. Took a while to get ECC, not sure about VROC now after the disaster of needing to buy a key to do that.
And I quote Linus Torvalds:
And the memory manufacturers claim it's because of economics and lower power. And they are lying bastards—let me once again point to row-hammer about how those problems have existed for several generations already, but these f*ckers happily sold broken hardware to consumers and claimed it was an "attack," when it always was "we're cutting corners."
How many times has a row-hammer like bit-flip happened just by pure bad luck on real non-attack loads? We will never know. Because Intel was pushing shit to consumers.
From the same article
Torvalds takes the bold position that the lack of ECC RAM in consumer technology is Intel's fault due to the company's policy of artificial market segmentation. Intel has a vested interest in pushing deeper-pocketed businesses toward its more expensive—and profitable—server-grade CPUs rather than letting those entities effectively use the necessarily lower-margin consumer parts.
The community punishes AMD heavily for their sins, yet we look the other way when Intel does it. The consumer-grade Intel buyers, are a very vocal crowd.
But if we're going to talk about artificial market segmentation, AMD is much, much better than Intel, they don't have locked CPUs, they don't have locked motherboards, as a Kernel Contributor/Maintainer, I've had my fair share of issues with Intel. Don't even get me started on the transactional memory disaster.
I am an entitled buyer, and I will always be, everyone is entitled nowadays, corporations are entitled too, so I am following the crowd. And as an entitled buyer, I will keep voicing whenever I disagree, because I can, and I must, no one can stop me, and I am totally unable to stop the brand fanactics over there.
I own both AMD and Intel systems, I recently RMA'd my 13900K and I got myself a 14900K. Life goes on, if it is bad, it is bad, if it works, fine.
Why can't we all, as a community just be normal?