- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
- Messages
- 2,428 (1.16/day)
- Location
- Olympia, WA
System Name | Sleepy Painter |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
Motherboard | Asus TuF Gaming X570-PLUS/WIFI |
Cooling | FSP Windale 6 - Passive |
Memory | 2x16GB F4-3600C16-16GVKC @ 16-19-21-36-58-1T |
Video Card(s) | MSI RX580 8GB |
Storage | 2x Samsung PM963 960GB nVME RAID0, Crucial BX500 1TB SATA, WD Blue 3D 2TB SATA |
Display(s) | Microboard 32" Curved 1080P 144hz VA w/ Freesync |
Case | NZXT Gamma Classic Black |
Audio Device(s) | Asus Xonar D1 |
Power Supply | Rosewill 1KW on 240V@60hz |
Mouse | Logitech MX518 Legend |
Keyboard | Red Dragon K552 |
Software | Windows 10 Enterprise 2019 LTSC 1809 17763.1757 |
Even if 'equal by specification' (or less), a LiFePo4 'Lithium battery' can be discharged *much* deeper than a Lead-Acid before the battery is permanently damaged.How does the capacity compare?
Also, the peak current output of a LiFePo4 is much higher. Even moderately discharged, a LiFePo4 will turn over a starter easier than a Lead Acid w/ low voltage.
[Referencing back to how batteries have less effective capacity the heavier the relative discharge load (C), means that a LiFePo4 will have more effective capacity in 'heavy' / transient loads -like start/stop equipped automobiles]
Typically, <50% State of Charge on any flavor of Lead-Acid can/will damage the battery, reducing capacity and peak 'cranking amps' permanently. [I know this one 1st hand, repeatedly ]
TBQH, Cold performance and Cost are the two biggest cons alongside BMS complexity/reliability.
If cold is a non-issue, and one sees the value in the overall costs, they're fantastic.
LiFePo4 in particular is also very stable/safe.
IMO, the immediate current output is more dangerous than the chemistry itself; they can't 'go nuclear' like many other flavors of Lithium. Also, much safer in a fire, IIRC.
[Wouldn't want to hit the starter's power lead w/ a ratchet. It's bad enough on 'normal' car batteries ]
Last edited: