- Joined
- Jun 14, 2020
- Messages
- 3,467 (2.13/day)
System Name | Mean machine |
---|---|
Processor | 12900k |
Motherboard | MSI Unify X |
Cooling | Noctua U12A |
Memory | 7600c34 |
Video Card(s) | 4090 Gamerock oc |
Storage | 980 pro 2tb |
Display(s) | Samsung crg90 |
Case | Fractal Torent |
Audio Device(s) | Hifiman Arya / a30 - d30 pro stack |
Power Supply | Be quiet dark power pro 1200 |
Mouse | Viper ultimate |
Keyboard | Blackwidow 65% |
12900k isn't faster, it's just gets less of a hit in performance in heavier scenes. It's still slower than the 9800x 3d (bar the odd game here and there) but as I've said, way more consistent. I think it's totally due to the memory subsystem. A cache hit imposes a way bigger penalty on the x3d due to the slower memory subsystem, but a correct cache prediction also helps it more, resulting in insanely high maximum frames but relatively low minimum frames.x3D cache adds ~5ns to the AIDA result.
The main nvme has a direct connection to the CPU if I'm not mistaken, the second nvme goes through the chipset if the SSD is SATA, probably also through the chipset.
The fine-tuned 12900k has more cores (threads) and more raw performance, so in heavy scenes with many objects - it will be faster.
The 9800x3D will be faster where latency plays a role because in most cases it will use the cached x3D data (~7ns) but not the RAM (~60ns).
You are getting 64 after the new agesa or before? Cause im stuck at 63-64 with 6400c28 tuned to hell. AMD promised an agesa fix for that.View attachment 373277
new AGESA is out - got a bit of latency reduction.
View attachment 373276
Frame pacing is a bit better. Still beta bios tho.