AMD Radeon 9070 XT Rumored to Outpace RTX 5070 Ti by Almost 15%

[Visible Noise]

It should be around RTX 5070 Ti but 699$ pricepoint is too close. Even RX 7800 XT was ~17% cheaper than RTX 4070 so it should cost around 625$ to make a success. This time RT gap will be somewhat closed.

Anything over $549 and RDNA is RDOA.

 

[JohH]

Bullpoop. It's the replacement for the 7800 XT. It won't be that fast. If it matches the 7900 XT that would be impressive.

 

[Super XP]

9070 for $499 and 9070XT for $699 would actually be a jackpot.

Well that all depends. AMD positioned its RX 9070s to go up against Nvidia's RTX 5070s and not the RTX 5080s. I also believe AMD originally thought Nvidia would have priced its RTX 5070Ti & non Ti much higher. But Nvidia changed the pricing scheme last minute. AMD was hoping that the 5070Ti would be around $899 so that they too can price their 9070XT at $799 or $829 or so IMO. I say this because AMD Overpriced its RDNA 2 & RDNA 3 GPUs quite significantly, which equated to losing significant market share.

AMD to price its dGPUs at 15-20% cheaper.
RTX 5070 = $549 - As reported by Nvidia via CES
RX 9070 = $449
----------------
RTX 5070Ti = $749 - As reported by Nvidia vis CES
RX 9070XT = $599
----------------
RTX 5080 = $999
RX 9080XT = $899 - Rumored to come 6 months after the 9070XT is officially launched & available.

 

[TheinsanegamerN]

AMD also discloses their known driver issues, Nvidia doesn't so a lot of generalizations happen on thinking only AMD has any issues.

ROFL you can't be serious. Really? I knwo there's people who want to desperately meatshield for AMD but this is just....bruh.

https://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/572.16/572.16-win11-win10-release-notes.pdf

Perhaps the reason every nvidia driver release doesnt contain a list about known issues is because.....they dont typically ship with longstanding known issues?

Well that all depends. AMD positioned its RX 9070s to go up against Nvidia's RTX 5070s and not the RTX 5080s. I also believe AMD originally thought Nvidia would have priced its RTX 5070Ti & non Ti much higher. But Nvidia changed the pricing scheme last minute. AMD was hoping that the 5070Ti would be around $899 so that they too can price their 9070XT at $799 or $829 or so IMO. I say this because AMD Overpriced its RDNA 2 & RDNA 3 GPUs quite significantly, which equated to losing significant market share.

AMD to price its dGPUs at 15-20% cheaper.
RTX 5070 = $549 - As reported by Nvidia via CES
RX 9070 = $449
----------------
RTX 5070Ti = $749 - As reported by Nvidia vis CES
RX 9070XT = $599
----------------
RTX 5080 = $999
RX 9080XT = $899 - Rumored to come 6 months after the 9070XT is officially launched & available.

Oh man, now that you said it MLID is gonna make 3 videos about RX 9080 confirmed launching faster then 4090 videos.

 

[chrcoluk]

If it beats 4080S, then I would consider 699 a fair price that I would personally pay for it

Yes that would be good price/perf for where it needs to be.

 

[Super XP]

ROFL you can't be serious. Really? I knwo there's people who want to desperately meatshield for AMD but this is just....bruh.

https://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/572.16/572.16-win11-win10-release-notes.pdf

Perhaps the reason every nvidia driver release doesnt contain a list about known issues is because.....they dont typically ship with longstanding known issues?


Oh man, now that you said it MLID is gonna make 3 videos about RX 9080 confirmed launching faster then 4090 videos.

Actually I didn't say it. It was a couple people off X.

 

[JustBenching]

The 4080 12GB was $800 for 40TF w/ 12GB of ram. Eight Hundred Fucking Dollars and you can't play some games with high settings at 1440p comfortably.

The 7900xt was 900$ and you could play even less game at 1440p due to lacking RT performance. Cry me a river

 

[Jtuck9]

I want your answer, not a generic tome on Nvidia's glory that I don't have time to read. I want data, not text - data actually is available here on TPU, and tells me that the 5080 is a 4080 Super with a new name.

A generic tome based on the persons experience with the card. I don't have one. From other things I've glanced at apparently the transformer DLSS4 model elevates the card to the 4K card you should be after. TPU themselves have opined on the quality of the technology ""Quality" looks like native, sometimes better." Plus factor things in like the size of the card (cooling) etc...

Dunno. You tell me.

I have my theories. Why If I had the money I'd look at a 5080 to last me a few good years and why I lend weight to the legitimacy of DLSS 4 (as well as the negatives). I hope AMD give me an opportunity to re-evaluate my position because I don't think I've ever owned an Nvidia GPU. Even the laptop I'm currently using has an APU in it.

Actually I didn't say it. It was a couple people off X.

Probably the same person doing the rounds in the videocardz comment section. I'm personally wondering if they aren't just saving the high end for UDNA or whatever focuses more / has the capacity for neural rendering, which high end 50 series cards presumably do.