I-I dunno, I dunno if I'm being overly petty here. Even if you don't know I'm using one, I can't digest why I ...or monitors of that form factor got hit with such a, erm, bad rude take.
There's a wall between "waste of money scammy trash" and "top-of-the-line product in a niche form factor with a price tag to match". And maybe I'm crazy, but for this specific case I know well enough on what I'm gaining with the product. I'm commited to the plan, and I don't need someone else trashing on the plan.
YEAH, I agree and have seen that there are even 24" 4K, which, again were "blessed by happy photoshoppers", but, even for this one I have "my story": I got 24" WQHD (2K) one for office work, then... realized it's UNUSABLE at 100% without deep-eye-penetrating into screen, which is already pain in the.. umm well again eyes, because the screen is small to stare at, compared to, say, 27". So again we have "case", where pictures/movies will be "PERFECT to watch at", but at the same we are having LOWER THAN ADVERTISED RESOLUTION (recommended by Windows is 125% which is 2048x1152, wtf is this compared to 1080p then, and even lower than 1200p vertical of that "gold 16:10 era" lol) or we need to burn eyes using it at 100%. So it isn't "niche", it's better "dumb", sorry. No offence bro.
I'm really skeptical about the new GPU releases and GPU's in general. On one hand you have NV with the high prices, despite what NV says about those and what tech it offers. On the other hand you have AMD which may be lower in price but still does not offer much of a performance bump. Intel, well Intel is still waiting for an opportunity. I must say, it will be hard for me to upgrade my graphics. Considering i dont play much nowadays, and if I do, my 6900xt agrees with me fully with games I play, I might skip this gen upgrade as well.
Yeah i dont need scaling as well with my 27-inch 4K screen and why would I? I see everything clearly. 32-inch is too big for me anyway.
same here. I understand that this is "bad" for the eyes, but that's me, when "chillin" with PC I'm ok to "sit close" to monitor utilizing full resolution for my tasks whichever this resolution is. But for 9-17 workday I sit from distance and using crazy scaling factor, well, just not to burden my eyes lol.
as about 32" I have tried to use 32" TV (FHD lol) as a monitor. Super good for "healthy distance", not usable for "close sit" then. Well, I'm currently a lappie-boy, (don't want to mess with external monitor again), but, in future if I will go for 32" it will be clearly 4K, and if I'll choose 2K (I hate WQHD break-ya-tongue-name) it will be 27".
