- Joined
- May 30, 2018
- Messages
- 1,890 (0.78/day)
- Location
- Cusp Of Mania, FL
Processor | Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|
Motherboard | Asus ROG Strix X370-F |
Cooling | Dark Rock 4, 3x Corsair ML140 front intake, 1x rear exhaust |
Memory | 2x8GB TridentZ RGB [3600Mhz CL16] |
Video Card(s) | EVGA 3060ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming |
Storage | 970 EVO 500GB nvme, 860 EVO 250GB SATA, Seagate Barracuda 1TB + 4TB HDDs |
Display(s) | 27" MSI G27C4 FHD 165hz |
Case | NZXT H710 |
Audio Device(s) | Modi Multibit, Vali 2, Shortest Way 51+ - LSR 305's, Focal Clear, HD6xx, HE5xx, LCD-2 Classic |
Power Supply | Corsair RM650x v2 |
Mouse | iunno whatever cheap crap logitech *clutches Xbox 360 controller security blanket* |
Keyboard | HyperX Alloy Pro |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | ask your mother |
Reasonable way to look at it. Honestly, I don't think I would either. But in this case the parent really seems beyond that way of looking at it. She doesn't think or feel the same as we do.I, for one, wouldn't want my last memory of my child to be virtual.
I can see it another way. What if the last memories you had of your child only caused you pain and made you unable to see them for the good within them? What do you do when the best memories you have of someone only lead to suffering? That's not easy to deal with, because somewhere in your mind you want to embrace them, but instead every time you see a chance to, you register fear instead of peace. And with the way the mind works, it can program itself to make that response stronger over time. It becomes just another layer to the pain. It is no longer about the loss. You can internalize the loss perfectly and still be under the grips of that.
I could see a 'goodbye' like this as maybe helping to resolve that and allowing the person to re-integrate the real memories as something more positive. By forming a few new positive memories, not implicitly tied to the same pain, it might open some new pathways. Sort of creating a scenic route to get around that gridlocked highway and hopefully get where you're trying to go and proceed to really heal. Sometimes, that's just the way it goes.
Pain can rewire you, especially trauma. This is why it can be hard to gauge people's reactions, and why we often find eachother's coping mechanisms strange. Because not everyone is wired the same to begin with. We can think and say how we might react, but that's just how you're wired now. That can change very quickly. You see things differently when you're not directly subject to the same experience in the moment. There are pros and cons, but I want to highlight the gap in perception, because there is a huge difference between how we perceive things, and how this woman perceives things. What makes sense for us can easily have no bearing on her.
I also wonder... do you really see something like this as your last memory of your child? Or is it simply allowing a temporary suspension of disbelief in order to open certain doors? A lot of gray to how people actually perceive and internalize the experience. On one hand, I can see where people might see this as someone losing contact with reality and going further in, but then I am also familiar with the research on psychedelic therapy... so I can see how maybe it's not about believing that the experience is real, but rather meant as a means of integrating the emotions that it leaves you with in a more positive way. I think there is much that can be learned from having a simulated experience, so long as you understand that the goal is not to change your reality, but rather augment how you deal with it.
This is already the basis of a whole lot of trauma therapy - essentially re-writing things to make it so that a person presently unable to cope can take that first step forward and begin to become strong enough to fully face the actual reality of what they have and are still going through. It's very closely tied to a lot of the same methods that are already used in the therapy that people are recommending she go to instead. Simulated experiences are not new at all in the therapeutic world. What we have here is a new way of producing one. One that is more visceral and requires less effort on the part of the participant, which can be very important when we are talking about someone who is struggling to function amidst a steady flow of powerful emotions. If we had the capability to do this back then, the same people who came up with things that are now common practice would have been eager to put them to use and figure out how to use them to help people.
So to me, seeing something like this isn't surprising. I think it was bound to happen. I don't see it as good or bad. Just exploring new avenues of dealing with deep emotional pain and trauma. I think we ought to at least try. I don't think it's good to meet it with disgust. Caution and careful contemplation is better.
To me, it's like... when you're already in a place where a large part of your existence is already defined by reliving terrible memories, how much worse can it really get?
I also gotta address our problems with mental health right now. There has been this push for what I would call 'psuedo mental health' in pop culture, with a heavily narcissistic bend to it. Questioning it seemingly isn't allowed, which makes it hard to have the important conversations. There is a lot of venom and vitriol. I think that does a lot of damage. It's very superficial and encouraging of self-destructive attitudes. It is easy to muster hatred and disdain for it. But the knee jerk reaction to it is just as bad. We're throwing out the baby with the bathwater in a really harsh way. It's no better to assume that something is a part of that same movement just because it only makes people feel better. Dealing with grief is inherently a self-serving endeavor. Doesn't make it any less vital. I don't think it's good that our answer to this mental health craze is to turn our backs reflexively. I can't bring myself to be that cynical, knowing that people may be left out in the cold for it.
This idea that we are too attached to our egos, and that somehow by recognizing that and pushing against it, we are somehow above the same process, really rubs me the wrong way. They are inseparable, and it serves many vital functions in making a person who they are. If you think that somehow you're above that, I got news for ya...
If you actually read up on how narcissism works, you'll realize that if you confront a narcissist on being one, the most common response is denial. They will jump right to arguments for why they are not one, and turn it on to other people. If you truly rate people as a whole as being more narcissistic than you, you may just be the one yourself! The same traits that make someone a narcissist are absolutely vital defense mechanisms that we all learn at a very early age. It's how it is used that defines a narcissist. Not everything that is self-serving is implicitly narcissistic, not in the way that the term is often used, anyway. It's not "all things self-serving are bad". Sometimes that's exactly what a person needs. Doing something only to feel better does not always make you worse off. Everyone with a functioning ego does that all of the time. We actually can't function as unified entities otherwise. You would simply cease to exist. And at the same time be devoid of any judgement on others...
It's like "Look at all of these people, only caring about themselves! Look how I am not like them!" From the outside looking in, that is an interesting take.
Last edited: