• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Post your Cinebench R23 Score

BCLK 105 /LLC:6 / (-) 175 Mhz Boost Clock
6200MT/s CL28 36 32 30
VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.24v
CINEBENCH_R23_CPU_Multi_Core_19060.jpg
ZenTimings_6200 28cl G.Skill.png
 
Last edited:
Its not the size that matters.. its how you use it right..? Right?

:laugh:

Damn this thing. My AM4 days are numbered :D

2.PNG


And this is the last one I ran with my 5900X.. not bad for PBO.

bestpbo.PNG
 
CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC:6 - Scaler X8 - (-) 175 Mhz Boost Clock - Stable, SHA3, etc.
  • (-) 175 Mhz Boost Clock low as it goes stable - 10X scaler not stable.
  • Boost Clock adjust by +/- 25 Mhz increments.

RAM: 6200MT/s CL28 36 32 30 / 2200FCLK
VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.24v

CINEBENCH_R23_CPU_Multi_Core_19100.jpg
ZenTimings_6200 28cl G.Skill.png
 
8700G with a big ass passive cooler...

PXL_20240216_031607260.jpg cinebench23.jpg
 
i5-13500
igp UHD 770
B660M DS3H
16GB RAM (2x8) 3200MHz CL15 @1.3V

PL1/2: 65W (single) and 65/88W for Multi Core
* 88W is the power limit of an AMD processor with TDP 65W (without overclocking, of course).

Single Core

ciner23_single_65W.jpg


Multi Core 65 and 88 W

ciner23_multi_65W.jpg
ciner23_multi_88W.jpg
 
BCLK 105 - LLC7 - Scaler X6 - Boost Clock (-) 175 MHz / 5125MHz stable, SHA3, etc.
RAM: VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.24v
R23 19225.jpg
ZenTimings_6200 28cl G.Skill.png
 
Last edited:
CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC7 - Scaler X6 - Boost Clock (-) 175 MHz or 5125MHz stable, SHA3, etc.
RAM: 6200 MT/s CL28 36 32 30 / 2200FCLK
VDD: 1.45v VDDQ/IO: 1.30v VSOC: 1.235v

CINEBENCH_R23_CPU_Multi_Core_19304.jpg
ZenTimings_6200 28cl G.Skill.png
 
My X299 platform with I9 7940x OC and Undervolted by individual core from 4,1Ghz to 4,5Ghz.....Reg ECC memory at 2666Mhz with tweaked timings

c23.jpg
 
That thing is a damn beast. How much power does it draw while rendering this?
Well it is surprisingly low power draw because I undervolted this CPU I just measure PD with Aida sensor and with HWinfo according to those while running CB23 my max power draw was bellow 120W also I am using really ordinary cheap air cooler to keep it cool .....I recently get myself this machine actually just combo mobo+CPU+ram and I tweaked for a week or so playing and enjoying how cool is to OC every core differently so atm I settle down from 4,1Ghz to 4,5Ghz depend of the cores while pumping the Voltage from 1.027V up to the maximum 1.130 on the highest core clock......but yeah yeah if I tried to go higher for example all cores on 4,6-4,7 then I will need around 1,2v-1,3v on cores and then cores will get hot I will also need water cooling and power consumption can go up to 300W.....and honestly I don't see a lot of benefit doing that.......
 
Here's mine!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (9).png
    Screenshot (9).png
    1.8 MB · Views: 85
Score: 14917
I have a -5 offset on the curve optimiser for all cores set in the bios.

Specs:
  • 7600X
  • B650 Tomahawk
  • DDR5 6000 CL 30
  • Galahad Trinity ii
  • P5 Plus 1TB
  • P3 Plus 1TB
  • 7800XT Nitro+

Screenshot 2024-03-04 180910.png
20240201_203707.jpg
 
Last edited:
CPU: BCLK 105 - LLC7 - PBO Scaler X6 - Boost Clock (-) 150 MHz or 5150MHz

RAM: 6000MT/s CL28 35 32 30 / 2200 FCLK

CINEBENCH_R23_CPU_Multi_Core_19324.jpg
ZenTimings_6000-28cl.png

PC Photo3.jpg
 
Cinebench R23 13700K 20240308 160W.jpg
Cinebench R23 13700K 20240308 200W.jpg

One run @202 W which my regular setup. Another one @160W to compare with the 7900X above. Shows how the 7900X is more efficient but not by a huge deal : 4,3%
13700K underclock - 0,07.
 
Its not the size that matters.. its how you use it right..? Right?

:laugh:

Damn this thing. My AM4 days are numbered :D

View attachment 334327

And this is the last one I ran with my 5900X.. not bad for PBO.

View attachment 334328
Your core temps seem cool as mine. Makes me glad that I took out my 5800X on Christmas day. Without PBO, I didn't have more than around 65C, IIRC.
 
Its huge man ! BTW my cpu is not optimized for Mutlicore ( all core overclock) i am more interested in Single core score

View attachment 338143
PL 125W (similar to what I see with you)

14700K@125W Instant 6 GHz enabled.jpg



Update: I found an even more interesting screenshot.
The XTU profile is called "7800X3D Mode". The similarity consists only in the power limit (88W), because the results obtained are clearly in favor of 14700K/KF.

14700KF @ PL 88W.jpg
 
Last edited:
PL 125W (similar to what I see with you)

View attachment 338181


Update: I found an even more interesting screenshot.
The XTU profile is called "7800X3D Mode". The similarity consists only in the power limit (88W), because the results obtained are clearly in favor of 14700K/KF.

View attachment 338182
Man , you cant compare chip to chip like that ! the main advantages in CB multicore is the no. of cores that you have ( P or E)
14700K have 20 core /28T , with stock power you , it achieve 35K in CB :

cinebench-multi (1).png


if you wanna , put it in 125 mode , you gonna lose 18-20% performance ! which is huge tbh
the point is not to compare your to mine , the point is how you maximize the result with lowest possible wattage

BTW , 14900k is better then you in 125 mode ! to me is it valid ? NOT since this CPU is monster and lose significant performance on that mode
cinebench-multi.png


Edit :
Actually , i get EXACTLY same performance (28600)with significant less power ( 50-55 watt or 33% less) compare to stock

cinebench-multi (2).png


power-multithread.png


Screenshot 2024-03-08 233002.png
 
Last edited:
Man , you cant compare chip to chip like that ! the main advantages in CB multicore is the no. of cores that you have ( P or E)
14700K have 20 core /28T , with stock power you , it achieve 35K in CB :
Does it matter what's inside them? :confused: I just showed you that an Intel, at the same consumption, is not below a Ryzen and even achieves a better performance.
Another example, a better score with the limitation of 159W as I notice you have here.
Your score: 30138 pts
My score: 32199 pts
The score is significantly better, without tricks and optimizations, only with a simple limitation of PL with XTU.

159W.jpg

single-multi.jpg
 
Back
Top