Unigine Superposition Benchmark - post your results!

[Kanan]

So here are my 4K results. Why not, since it runs better than Extreme anyway.
2303|Swamp Monster|Phenom II X4 940 AM2 @ 3.5 GHz|MSI R9 380 4GB @ 980 MHz | 1425 MHz
4K OPTIMIZED:
View attachment 86911

Older system deserves some love too
1340|Swamp Monster|Phenom II X4 925 AM3 @ 2.8 GHz|XFX HD 5770 1GB @ 850 MHz | 1200 MHz
1080P MEDIUM:
View attachment 86912

and another Bulldozer build
5868|Swamp Monster|FX-8320 @ 3.5 GHz|MSI R9 280 3GB @ 1150 MHz | 1550 MHz
1080P MEDIUM:
View attachment 86914

4214|Swamp Monster|FX-8320 @ 3.5 GHz|MSI R9 280 3GB @ 1150 MHz | 1550 MHz
1080P HIGH:
View attachment 86915


1769|Swamp Monster|FX-8320 @ 3.5 GHz|MSI R9 280 3GB @ 1150 MHz | 1550 MHz
1080P EXTREME:
View attachment 86916

updated.

 

[MrGenius]

maybe dumm question but what means dpi scaling in the options?(i know what it means in windows)
is it for the 4k\8k benches to scale down on full hd monitors?
TIA

DPI(Dots Per Inch) scaling is for correcting launcher window and fonts scaling/size.

The render scaling/size is automatic. It can't be turned on or off. Which means it will scale/size the rendering of the benchmark at any preset or custom resolution to fit on any size screen(at any resolution). Up or down in size, automatically.

 

[Tardan]

Updated scores with a slightly higher memory overclock

6660|Tardan|i7 3770K @ 4.1 GHz|NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal @ 2063 Hz|1476 MHz

10390|Tardan|i7 3770K @ 4.1 GHz|NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal @ 2063 Hz|1476 MHz

4681|Tardan|i7 3770K @ 4.1 GHz|NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal @ 2063 Hz|1476 MHz

 

[FilipM]

10221|FilipM|X5660 @ 4.41 GHz|NVIDIA GTX1060 6GB @ 2126 MHz|2455 MHz

7299|FilipM|X5660 @ 4.41 GHz|NVIDIA GTX1060 6GB @ 2126 MHz|2455 MHz

2705|FilipM|X5660 @ 4.41 GHz|NVIDIA GTX1060 6GB @ 2126 MHz|2455 MHz

 

[jboydgolfer]

Yeah the formating is a mess, please fix.

A mess?really?nevermind

 

[MrGenius]

A mess?really?nevermind

Here, let me lend you a hand.

1080p Extreme:
2395 | jboydgolfer | Pentium G3258 @ 4.0Ghz | GTX 970 @ 1178MHz | 1753MHz

1080p Medium:
8757 | jboydgolfer | Pentium G3258 @ 4.0Ghz | GTX 970 @ 1178MHz | 1753MHz

Screenshots found here.

Do you think the boost clock is correct? That's what it's supposed to be for a stock GTX 970. But without monitoring it during the benchmark it's sort of guesswork if it was achieved during it or not. I assume it was though.

 

[Deleted member 50521]

HBM overclock does not justify the effort. Tried it, basically no gain in performance.

FuryX is pretty much overclocked to the max from factory. It is just not going to perform well in DX11/OGL environments.

I wish Superposition would introduce DX12/Vulkan support in the future. That would be really interesting.

 

[Slizzo]

You're first on 1080P High now. Seems that for 1080P Medium your clocks are too low and limit the GPU a bit but for 1080P High it seems to favour high L3 cache and doesn't care as much about the clocks too. /speculation

Yeah, I must confess that getting everything stable after installing the 1080Ti was a bear. I think it has to do with the age of my PSU (it's 7 years old or so now), so I'm looking at replacing that soon.

My ring ratio is set to stock right now (28x), that's the only way I was able to make my 4.2GHz stable. Not really willing to up any more voltage to the CPU, it's running at 1.365v currently.

 

[Kanan]

A mess?really?nevermind

Don't take it personally, I will update and include everything later. Right now at the mobile.

 

[Nuckles56]

My 4 year old laptop, I didn't even try anything more difficult than 1080p medium for good reason. And I think I can safely say that I have the lowest score currently.

1149 | Nuckles56 | i7 4700MQ @ 2.4Ghz | GT 745m @ 1045MHz | 900MHz

586 | Nuckles56 | i7 4700MQ @ 2.4Ghz | Intel HD 4600 @ 1150MHz | 800 MHz

 

[Kanan]

Updated scores with a slightly higher memory overclock

6660|Tardan|i7 3770K @ 4.1 GHz|NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal @ 2063 Hz|1476 MHz
View attachment 86926

10390|Tardan|i7 3770K @ 4.1 GHz|NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal @ 2063 Hz|1476 MHz
View attachment 86927

4681|Tardan|i7 3770K @ 4.1 GHz|NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal @ 2063 Hz|1476 MHz
View attachment 86925

Okay you're #1 on 1080p Extreme again.

Updated, you're in as well @jboydgolfer

 

[blacktruckryder]

13585-blacktruckryder / Intel I5 7600K @ 5.0Ghz / Msi GTX 1070 @ 1872Mhz (actual boost clock) / Memory clock 2177Mhz

 

[CAPSLOCKSTUCK]

Updated, you're in as well @jboydgolfer

surely the GPU core speed is wrong

 

[Kanan]

surely the GPU core speed is wrong

Yes its standard not GPU Boost 2.0 frequency, but it correlates with his low score so I didn't mind. I estimate it's about 1350 in real tops. @jboydgolfer if you care give me more info on it.

 

[khurram40]

980 ti in is full glory

 

[mdbrotha03]

22492 / mdbrotha03 / Intel i7-7700k 4.5 / Asus ROG Strix 1080 Ti @ 2050 Boost / Memory Clock 1431 Medium
16415 / mdbrotha03 / Intel i7-7700k 4.5 / Asus ROG Strix 1080 Ti @ 2050 Boost / Memory Clock 1431 High
6112 / mdbrotha03 / Intel i7-7700k 4.5/ Asus ROG Strix 1080 Ti @ 2050 Boost / Memory Clock 1431 Extreme
9439 / mdbrotha03 / Intel i7-7700k 4.5 / Asus ROG Strix 1080 Ti @ 2050 Boost / Memory Clock 1431 4k Optimized

 

[the54thvoid]

6138 / the54thvoid /Ryzen 1700X 3.9 / GTX 1080ti FE @ 2038 (max boost) / Memory Clock 1500

Must get some Ryzen love on that scoreboard....

 

[khurram40]

View attachment 87014

 

[the54thvoid]

2nd attempt....

(Afterburner turned off)

6266 / the54thvoid /Ryzen 1700X 3.9 / GTX 1080ti FE @ 2050 (max boost) / Memory Clock 1500

 

[_MissBehave_]

Ok so Kanan PM'd me and asked me to re-run my benchies as he thought I was under performing vs. other 980ti's. So thanks You were correct, I did some further benchmarks and my scores have really improved. Not as high as the top few but I am pretty happy with my score. I guess I just became braver and pushed those sliders further up lol.

4084|_MissBehave_|4.4GHz i5 4690k|MSi GTX 980Ti @1466Mhz|2000MHz

10075|_MissBehave_|4.4GHz i5 4690k|MSi GTX 980Ti @1466Mhz|2000MHz

Can't get any higher than that Kanan the benchmark starts to crash if I go any higher.

 

[Kanan]

980 ti in is full glory

View attachment 87017 View attachment 87014

Read #1 post / look at the rules.

2nd attempt....

(Afterburner turned off)

6266 / the54thvoid /Ryzen 1700X 3.9 / GTX 1080ti FE @ 2050 (max boost) / Memory Clock 1500

Interesting that turning off RivaTunerStatisticsServer and/or Afterburner seems to increase performance, maybe I should try that as well. Also thumbs up for bringing in Ryzen at a high level for the first time.

Ok so Kanan PM'd me and asked me to re-run my benchies as he thought I was under performing vs. other 980ti's. So thanks You were correct, I did some further benchmarks and my scores have really improved. Not as high as the top few but I am pretty happy with my score. I guess I just became braver and pushed those sliders further up lol.

4084|_MissBehave_|4.4GHz i5 4690k|MSi GTX 980Ti @1466Mhz|2000MHz

10075|_MissBehave_|4.4GHz i5 4690k|MSi GTX 980Ti @1466Mhz|2000MHz

Can't get any higher than that Kanan the benchmark starts to crash if I go any higher.

You did well.

---

Updated!

 

[EarthDog]

Interesting that turning off RivaTunerStatistics server and/or Afterburner seems to increase performance, maybe I should try that as well. Also thumbs up for bringing in Ryzen at a high level for the first time.

Its benchmarking.. you don't run the race with drag chute on.

The TPU effect.............

 

[Kanan]

Its benchmarking.. you don't run the race with drag chute on.

I'm not necessarily seeing observation and overclocking tools as a "drag chute".

 

[jboydgolfer]

Here, let me lend you a hand.

1080p Extreme:
2395 | jboydgolfer | Pentium G3258 @ 4.0Ghz | GTX 970 @ 1178MHz | 1753MHz

1080p Medium:
8757 | jboydgolfer | Pentium G3258 @ 4.0Ghz | GTX 970 @ 1178MHz | 1753MHz

Screenshots found here.

Do you think the boost clock is correct? That's what it's supposed to be for a stock GTX 970. But without monitoring it during the benchmark it's sort of guesswork if it was achieved during it or not. I assume it was though.

It's not that important to me, but thank you for your effort

 

[EarthDog]

I'm not necessarily seeing observation and overclocking tools as a "drag chute".

When you are benchmarking, typically, the object is to score the highest within a certain set of rules. Killing useless backround apps are one method to increase you score, albeit not by much. MSI AB is constantly pinging the card/system to give you all those readings...makes sense it gives a negligibly noticeable increase in some benchmarks.