Report an Error
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
- Graphics Processor
- GF100
- Cores
- 320
- TMUs
- 40
- ROPs
- 32
- Memory Size
- 2 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Bus Width
- 256 bit
GPU
Recommended Gaming Resolutions:
- 1366x768
- 1600x900
- 1920x1080
The Quadro 5000M was a professional mobile graphics chip by NVIDIA, launched on July 27th, 2010. Built on the 40 nm process, and based on the GF100 graphics processor, in its N10E-GLM5-A3 variant, the chip supports DirectX 12. The GF100 graphics processor is a large chip with a die area of 529 mm² and 3,100 million transistors. Unlike the fully unlocked GeForce GTX 480 Core 512, which uses the same GPU but has all 512 shaders enabled, NVIDIA has disabled some shading units on the Quadro 5000M to reach the product's target shader count. It features 320 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. NVIDIA has paired 2,048 MB GDDR5 memory with the Quadro 5000M, which are connected using a 256-bit memory interface. The GPU is operating at a frequency of 405 MHz, memory is running at 600 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective).
Being a mxm module card, the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M does not require any additional power connector, its power draw is rated at 100 W maximum. This device has no display connectivity, as it is not designed to have monitors connected to it. Rather it is intended for use in laptop/notebooks and will use the output of the host mobile device.
Being a mxm module card, the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M does not require any additional power connector, its power draw is rated at 100 W maximum. This device has no display connectivity, as it is not designed to have monitors connected to it. Rather it is intended for use in laptop/notebooks and will use the output of the host mobile device.
Graphics Processor
Mobile Graphics
- Release Date
- Jul 27th, 2010
- Generation
-
Quadro Fermi-M
(x000M)
- Predecessor
- Quadro FX Mobile
- Successor
- Quadro Kepler-M
- Production
- End-of-life
- Bus Interface
- MXM-B (3.0)
- Reviews
- 26 in our database
Relative Performance
Based on TPU review data: "Performance Summary" at 1920x1080, 4K for 2080 Ti and faster.
Performance estimated based on architecture, shader count and clocks.
Clock Speeds
- GPU Clock
- 405 MHz
- Shader Clock
- 810 MHz
- Memory Clock
-
600 MHz
2.4 Gbps effective
Memory
- Memory Size
- 2 GB
- Memory Type
- GDDR5
- Memory Bus
- 256 bit
- Bandwidth
- 76.80 GB/s
Render Config
- Shading Units
- 320
- TMUs
- 40
- ROPs
- 32
- SM Count
- 10
- L1 Cache
- 64 KB (per SM)
- L2 Cache
- 512 KB
Theoretical Performance
- Pixel Rate
- 8.100 GPixel/s
- Texture Rate
- 16.20 GTexel/s
- FP32 (float)
- 518.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
- Slot Width
- MXM Module
- TDP
- 100 W
- Outputs
- Portable Device Dependent
- Power Connectors
- None
- Board Number
- P1038 SKU 503
Graphics Features
- DirectX
- 12 (11_0)
- OpenGL
- 4.6
- OpenCL
- 1.1
- Vulkan
- N/A
- CUDA
- 2.0
- Shader Model
- 5.1
GF100 GPU Notes
| PureVideo HD: VP4 VDPAU: Feature Set C GF100 has 4 GPCs each capable of 8 pixels per clock. This limits complete GPU to 32 pixels per clock and because of that it can't feed all 48 ROPs when they all require data at the same time. Additional ROPs however can be used for MSAA (because it doesn't require additional data from rasterizers, while giving more work to ROPs.) Latest Drivers: Windows 2000: Quadro Release 261.19 Windows XP / Server 2003 x64: GeForce Release 368.81 Quadro Release R319 U2 (321.01) Tesla Release 340.62 / R319 U2 (321.01) Windows Vista: GeForce Release 365.19 Quadro Release R346 U7 (348.40) Tesla Release 340.84 Windows 7 / 8 / 8.1 / 10 (x32 / x64): GeForce Release 391.35 Quadro Release R375 U11 (377.83) Tesla Release 340.84 / 412.29 |
Nov 5th, 2024 18:30 EST
change timezone
Latest GPU Drivers
New Forum Posts
- Are the 2 mentioned monitors a good upgrade over my current one? (6)
- 2022-X58/1366 PIN Motherboards NVME M.2 SSD BIOS MOD Collection (760)
- What are you playing? (22122)
- 5950x/5900x on a low end trash mb-black friday sale (6)
- E-cores still evolve. But is there a reason for it? (112)
- Laptop battery degrading or charger issue (9)
- Ryzen 7950X on air..? (38)
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard performance analysis (40)
- New RTX 5090 + 9800X3D build: ASUS TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI a good choice? (59)
- Post your Anvil's Storage score for SSD (37)
Popular Reviews
- Dragon Age: The Veilguard Performance Benchmark Review
- SilverStone SETA A2 Review
- DDR5 Memory Performance Scaling with AMD Zen 5
- Call of Duty: Black Ops 6 Performance Benchmark Review - AMD FTW
- Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review
- Ocypus Iota C70 BK ARGB Review
- G-Wolves Hati-R 8K Review
- Enermax PlatiGemini 1200 W Review
- Intel Core Ultra 7 265K Review
- I\OAudio SOGNO In-Ear Monitors Review - 2 DD, 6 BA, All Harman
Controversial News Posts
- AMD Falling Behind: Radeon dGPUs Absent from Steam's Top 20 (170)
- Quick Denuvo DRM Cracks Cost Game Publishers 20% in Revenue, According to Study (136)
- AMD Introduces Next-Generation AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, $479, Nov 7 (124)
- MSI OCLab Reveals Ryzen 9000X3D 11-13% Faster Than 7000X3D, AMD Set to Dominate "Arrow Lake" in Gaming (123)
- Apple and Samsung in the Fray to Acquire Intel: Rumor (121)
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Comes with 120W TDP, 5.20 GHz Boost, All Specs Leaked (120)
- Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K Performance Claims Leaked, Doesn't Beat i9-14900K at Gaming (114)
- NVIDIA Tunes GeForce RTX 5080 GDDR7 Memory to 32 Gbps, RTX 5070 Launches at CES (112)