RCA Evolution M27PG135F Review - 240 Hz Gaming Beast With Productivity Prowess 23

RCA Evolution M27PG135F Review - 240 Hz Gaming Beast With Productivity Prowess

Value & Conclusion »

Gaming Performance

The RCA Evolution M27PG135F sports a 240 Hz refresh rate Fast IPS, which supports the adaptive synchronization technology on AMD, NVIDIA, and Intel graphics cards. The adaptive synchronization range is 48–240 Hz, so that's the framerate range your PC should be able to achieve at 2560x1440 resolution to experience buttery smooth, screen-tear-free gameplay. For modern mid-range gaming rigs, that's not too hard of a challenge.

The gaming performance is where RCA's monitor shines. When playing a game at 200 or more frames per second, the action is superbly fluid, and the monitor feels incredibly responsive. You get a feeling that there's nothing you can't do on the battlefield. This is thanks to good moving image sharpness, as well as impressively low input lag. Let's examine the measurements.

Response Time and Overdrive

The response time of the RCA Evolution M27PG135F is specified as 5 ms GtG typical and 1.7 ms GtG with overdrive. The panel uses overdrive technology to make the pixel transitions faster by stimulating them with increased voltage, and you will find the option in the Gaming Setup > Overdrive menu in the OSD. Overdrive has four settings: Off, Low, Middle, and High.

I tested the response time with the Open Source Response Time Tool (OSRTT), developed by Andrew McDonald of TechTeamGB. It's a nifty tool that, combined with the OSRTT Launcher app, measures panel response times and presents them through detailed graphs and easy-to-read heatmaps. You can find everything you might want to know about the OSRTT in its technical documentation and on the official website, where you can order your unit, too. The OSRTT gives us three interesting heat maps to observe.

Perceived Response Time tells us how much time the panel took to transition from one color to another. This measurement is expressed in milliseconds and includes overshoot. In other words, if the panel exceeded the target value, the perceived response time also includes the time it took for the transition to recover from overshoot and stabilize on the target value. I'm running my tests with recommended settings, so with a fixed RGB 5 tolerance level and with gamma-corrected RGB values.

RGB Overshoot tells us how much a specific transition missed the target value. For example, if the panel was transitioning from RGB 51 to RGB 204, and it initially landed on RGB 212, the overshoot RGB value is 8. Overshoot can be both positive and negative, and it commonly occurs at extreme overdrive settings when pixels are driven by high voltage. In practice, an overshoot manifests as an afterimage or a halo around a moving object. It can be easily spotted even when doing something as basic as scrolling through a webpage.

Visual Response Rating is the most abstract heatmap generated by the OSRTT Launcher; in essence, it's an ever-evolving scoring system. To quote OSRTT's technical documentation, it is a finite score rather than a direct measurement. The calculation is pretty simple; it's: "100 – (Initial Response Time + Perceived Response Time)". Since both metrics use the same tolerance level, if a display doesn't overshoot, both times will be identical. This essentially rewards displays that are fast with a small amount of overshoot over displays that aren't as fast even if they don't overshoot at all – while still overall preferring ultra-fast, accurate monitors.

Here's how the RCA Evolution M27PG135F fares in the pixel response time test.






As you can see by examining the numerical data and accompanying heatmaps, the best overdrive setting is Low. It has a lower perceived pixel transition time value than when the overdrive is set to Off, and no perceivable overshoot. The Middle setting improves the perceived response time further but introduces a higher amount of overshoot. The High setting has too much overshoot to be viable.

Moving Picture Response Time (MPRT)

In the OSD's Gaming Setup menu, you'll find the MPRT toggle. If you turn it on, the backlight will start strobing to achieve a faster pixel response time at the expense of picture brightness. You're also losing the ability to use adaptive synchronization; turning MPRT on instantly deactivates FreeSync/G-SYNC. MPRT can be used with the refresh rate set to 240 Hz.

The MPRT response time is not to be confused with GtG response time, as the commonly used GtG value tells us how much time it takes for a pixel to change between two colors. At the same time, MPRT, also known as display persistence, represents how long a pixel is continuously visible. It's important to know that MPRT isn't a blur reduction technology but a measurement that can be lowered by backlight strobing.

Activating MPRT on the RCA Evolution M27PG135F lowers the panel's brightness down to 81 cd/m², and there's nothing you can do to increase it. As soon as you touch the brightness control, MPRT deactivates. That brightness is too low for anything, even nighttime gaming, rendering the MPRT mode useless.

Input Lag

To measure the input lag of a monitor, I switched from using the LDAT V2 (Latency Display Analysis Tool), which I've covered extensively in my NVIDIA Reflex review, to the OSRTT Tool. The OSRTT Tool and the accompanying software include a DirectX code developed by Andrew McDonald of TechTeamGB, which allows the OSRTT Launcher to track the events and capture the frame time, making it possible to isolate the monitor latency from other factors that come into play when using the click-to-photon testing methodology, namely the USB polling rate and game render time. For a deeper insight, I suggest you watch an excellent overview video made by Andy himself.

While I used a consistent methodology in all my previous LDAT-based monitor reviews and kept everything the same, switching to the OSRTT-based approach isolates me from potential issues, such as game engine updates (I based my tests on Overwatch, which transformed into Overwatch 2), and allows me to move on to a different testing system at will. I have to admit it was becoming increasingly annoying having to keep my old Core i9-9900K/RTX 2080 Super test system around for nothing but monitor input lag testing. Thanks to Andy for his tireless work on the OSRTT Tool and the OSRTT Launcher software!

Here's how the RCA Evolution M27PG135F holds up in terms of input lag after doing 100 iterations of the input lag test.



The RCA Evolution M27PG135F shows an average input lag of only 2.3 milliseconds, which is an outstanding score for a gaming monitor. Such low input lag can't be picked up even by the most hardcore gamers, including esports professionals.
Next Page »Value & Conclusion
View as single page
Oct 30th, 2024 08:26 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts