Monday, January 29th 2024

Intel, Marvell, and Synopsys to Showcase Next-Gen Memory PHY IP Capable of 224 Gbps on 3nm-class FinFET Nodes

The sneak peeks from the upcoming IEEE Solid State Circuit Conference continues, as the agenda items unveil interesting tech that will be either unveiled or demonstrated there. Intel, Synopsys, and Marvell, are leading providers of DRAM physical layer interface (PHY) IP. Various processor, GPU, and SoC manufacturers license PHY and memory controller IP from these companies, to integrate with their designs. All three companies are ready with over 200 Gbps around the 2.69 to 3 petajoule per bit range. This energy cost is as important as the data-rate on offer; as it showcases the viability of the PHY for a specific application (for example, a smartphone SoC has to conduct its memory sub-system at a vastly more constrained energy budget compared to an HPC processor).

Intel is the first in the pack to showcase a 224 Gbps sub-picojoule/bit PHY transmitter that supports PAM4 and PAM6 signaling, and is designed for 3 nm-class FinFET foundry nodes. If you recall, Intel 3 will be the company's final FinFET node before it transitions to nanosheets with the Intel 20A node. At the physical layer, all digital memory signal is analogue, and Intel's IP focuses on the DAC aspect of the PHY. Next up, is a somewhat similar transceiver IP by Synopsys. This too claims 224 Gbps speeds at 3 pJ/b, but at a 40 dB insertion loss; and is designed for 3 nm class FinFET nodes such as the TSMC N3 family and Intel 3. Samsung's 3 nm node uses the incompatible GAAFET technology for its 3 nm EUV node. Lastly, there's Marvell, with a 212 Gb/s DSP-based transceiver for optical direct-detect applications on the 5 nm FinFET nodes, which is relevant for high speed network switching fabrics.
Source: Harukaze5719 (Twitter)
Add your own comment

4 Comments on Intel, Marvell, and Synopsys to Showcase Next-Gen Memory PHY IP Capable of 224 Gbps on 3nm-class FinFET Nodes

#1
111frodon
I think you meant pico-joules per bit and not peta-joules...
Posted on Reply
#2
xrli
3 petajoule per bit!!! each pin is going to be using 3e15*224e9 joule of energy lol! That is near 7e26 joules per second, twice more energy emitted by our SUN every second. So you need 2 suns to power 1 signal lane. Can't imagine how much power we will need for 1 dimm module going this fast: )
Posted on Reply
#3
marios15
111frodonI think you meant pico-joules per bit and not peta-joules...
Intel may have misunderstood what AMD meant with "The future is fusion"
Posted on Reply
#4
Wirko
The choice of illustration is not very fortunate, it shows something sending data at 8 Gbit/s...
Posted on Reply
May 21st, 2024 08:16 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts