Sunday, December 20th 2009

SAPPHIRE Solves Eyefinity Issue with Active DisplayPort Adapter

A feature of the latest SAPPHIRE HD 5000 series of graphics cards is the new ATI Eyefinity mode, which enables games and other applications to be run on three screens treated as one continuous display area. Now with the SAPPHIRE Eyefinity adapter, standard DVI monitors can be used for all three screens.

In addition to spectacular image clarity, speed and visual effects, the SAPPHIRE HD 5000 series supports the new multi-monitor mode known as ATI Eyefinity. This allows a single GPU to display a choice of images over an array of several monitors. The cards in this series support up to three monitors, with a resolution of up to 7680 x 1600. This opens up exciting possibilities not just for multi-screen gaming, but also for information systems, multimedia systems and promotional displays.
However, with this family of cards, although two of the screens can be connected directly to the DVI or HDMI outputs on the card, the third display has to be driven from the DisplayPort output. Some users have expressed concern about the cost or availability of DisplayPort compatible monitors, or a wish to match existing monitor styles.

Now SAPPHIRE has introduced an active powered DisplayPort to DVI converter, which allows any standard DVI monitor to be used as the third screen and enabled in Eyefinity mode. This allows users to update their existing multi-monitor setup to use Eyefinity, or to add a lower cost DVI monitor to complete their Eyefinity system. The SAPPHIRE converter is simply plugged into the DisplayPort output of the graphics card, together with a standard USB connection to provide power. A standard DVI monitor cable can then be connected to the female DVI connector on the unit.

This series of cards is supported by AMD's DirectX 11 WHQL certified graphics driver which delivers support for all of the key DirectX 11 level features required for new gaming experiences and acceleration of next generation high performance applications.
Add your own comment

79 Comments on SAPPHIRE Solves Eyefinity Issue with Active DisplayPort Adapter

#51
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
FordGT90ConceptI'm trying to show why the two need separate, but compatible standards. Monitors are intended for a viewing distance of less than 2 feet where TVs are designed for 6+ feet. In order to get a good picture at less than two feet away, you need a really high resolution (dpi). Conversly, the farther away you get from the display, the lower the dpi necessary to make it look exactly the same to the eye. More DPI means more bandwidth and more bandwidth means more robust cables. I think it is a bad idea to attempt to merge the two. I mean, HDMI is just now getting market acceptance when DVI has been around a long time.

HDMI is good to go in the entertainment industry but it is time for the computer industry to move on. HDMI is old for that segment of the market.
your argument holds flawed logic.

since keyboards and mice dont need the bandwidth of USB and are designed for different things than flash drives, they should go back to PS/2 connectors - its been around longer.


Fair enough that you have your own opinion (dont care about HDMI) but your logic contradicts precendents - people prefer one unifying standard even if it does limit them slightly. its better than everyone having their own incompatible standards.
Posted on Reply
#52
mdm-adph
FordGT90ConceptThere are no choices anymore. You plug it in and the equipment tells everything connected what it is allowed to do regardless of what you, the consumer, actually want. This is just getting plain silly. Before long, you won't be able to do anything without signing a contract and connecting it to the Internet with which, they see, hear, and whatever else they conjure up without you having any authority beyond installing the equipment or not (and we know people would blindly agree--end justifies the means). The door is wide open to that doom's day prophecy with DisplayPort and once that door is open, it won't close.
Are you honestly surprised? What did you expect?

Posted on Reply
#53
Scrizz
i agree with GT90Concept
Posted on Reply
#54
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Musselssince keyboards and mice dont need the bandwidth of USB and are designed for different things than flash drives, they should go back to PS/2 connectors - its been around longer.
You know how a keyboard works, right? It has a series of interrupts and each key is assigned to a specific interrupt group. PS/2 is practically the same as USB in terms of wiring. If PS/2 were replaced with a new cable which supports one interrupt per key, there would never be a problem with interrupt collisions again. Instead of improving the keyboard connector, we threw it into a trash bin with all the other flawed connection standards.

Mice don't need as many interrupts as keyboards so more suitable connector than USB would be difficult to come by--unless something revolutionary happened.


The advantage of PS/2 mice and keyboard is that, if they plug in, you can be guaranteed they work so long as they aren't defective.
MusselsFair enough that you have your own opinion (dont care about HDMI) but your logic contradicts precendents - people prefer one unifying standard even if it does limit them slightly. its better than everyone having their own incompatible standards.
Standards = compatibility.
mdm-adphAre you honestly surprised? What did you expect?
I'm not surprised, no. It should be illegal to develop such standards (business, not consumer interest) internationally.


Edit: The USB hub often isn't initialized soon enough. For example, my DFI LP X58 motherboard doesn't initialize the USB hub until an OS is loading. This means that, with an USB keyboard, the BIOS are not accessible. I have to plug in a PS/2 keyboard (which is initialized before POST begins) in order to access the BIOS. Yet another reason why keyboards need their own dedicated cable, connectors, and protocols.
Posted on Reply
#56
Hayder_Master
Musselsits one display port to one DVI port - the other plug is USB for power.



techgage.com/reviews/ati/hd_5770/ati_hd_5770_03_thumb.jpg


To be honest, this does confuse me.

With 2x DVI, 1x HDMI and 1x DP, i dont see why users cant use a HDMI to DVI adaptor/cable for eyefinity without needing this expensive adaptor.

Is there some limitation with one of those DVI ports not working if the HDMI port is in use?
thanx for info :toast:
Posted on Reply
#57
Munchy
Excellent i have found people that actually know what they are on about,

I have been through this saga on several forums now and wondered if anyone can kick me in the right direction,

i have HD5870

3 monitors all working

2 x dvi and 1 passive display port adapter to dvi

now i can only use 2 @ a time so is this really because i need the expensive adapter?

Please do note i do not want extended desktop i only want monitor one and monitor two in extended mode and monitor three mirroring monitor 2

i figured as it is actually working on all three monitors (only 2 at a time) there must be a way to use 3 at the same time.

lol i know my answer but i just need someone to shout it at me so i believe them. :banghead:

i feel a little hard done by shelling out 220 on the card and then another 80 is for the adapter.

ps has anyone seen the active converters for sale anywhere?

Edit,

new train of thought?

Seeing as the passive dp to dvi is working is it possible that they wont all duplicate due to the third monitor being a different size?
Posted on Reply
#58
jagd
Correct you need active adapter for 3rd monitor www.amd.com/us/Documents/ATI_Eyefinity_Technology_Brief.pdf download pdf and read 7th and 8th pages


www.widescreengamingforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=16792&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=570
Read directly from Dave Bauman ( product manager of AMD/ATI )

Munchy i wish you had been written where are you living ,you can find DELL/blizzlink adapters at US and accell and sapphire adapters at Europe ,i gave a link to accell adapter at first page from a netherland company (accell = blizzlink ,retail brand according to info i found )
www.amd-news.com/assets/files/amd-cn/Eyefinity_SetupGuide_v1_AMD.pdf setup guide
Munchynow i can only use 2 @ a time so is this really because i need the expensive adapter?
Posted on Reply
#59
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
and all three monitors must be the same resolution, thats another requirement
Posted on Reply
#60
GSG-9
Musselsand all three monitors must be the same resolution, thats another requirement
and 1920x1080 max correct? Or can all 3 be run @ say 2048x1152.
Posted on Reply
#61
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
GSG-9and 1920x1080 max correct? Or can all 3 be run @ say 2048x1152.
i didnt see a max res, but that doesnt mean there isnt one
Posted on Reply
#62
FordGT90Concept
"I go fast!1!11!1!"
The safest max res would probably be 1920x1200 @ 60 Hz (single-link DVI). It might be able to go to dual-link DVI res (2560×1600 @ 60 Hz) but don't count on it.
Posted on Reply
#63
jagd
of course it is possible , ati demoed eyefinity on 2560* 1600 (3 monitor = 7680* 1600 and 6 monitor = 7680 *3200 config ) there are alot reviews with 2560*1600.
www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635
FordGT90ConceptIt might be able to go to dual-link DVI res (2560×1600 @ 60 Hz) but don't count on it.
Posted on Reply
#64
GSG-9
jagdof course it is possible , ati demoed eyefinity on 2560* 1600 (3 monitor = 7680* 1600 and 6 monitor = 7680 *3200 config ) there are alot reviews with 2560*1600.
www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635
Sweet, im glad to hear it. Does anyone know if you can still rotate monitors when using eyefinity? I have not seen anything about that either.
Posted on Reply
#65
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
GSG-9Sweet, im glad to hear it. Does anyone know if you can still rotate monitors when using eyefinity? I have not seen anything about that either.
since they all need the same resolution, they'd all have to have the same orientation
Posted on Reply
#66
GSG-9
Musselssince they all need the same resolution, they'd all have to have the same orientation
Yes but they can all be rotated 90 degrees, which you can imagine results in a completely different aspect ratio. The Triple Head 2 Go could do this, thats the only reason I ask.
Posted on Reply
#67
nugzo
jagdof course it is possible , ati demoed eyefinity on 2560* 1600 (3 monitor = 7680* 1600 and 6 monitor = 7680 *3200 config ) there are alot reviews with 2560*1600.
www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3635
Before eyefinity can be used for gaming, xfire must be supported. No way 1 graphics card can game great at 7860*1600. you almost need xfire/SLI even for 2560x1600.
Posted on Reply
#68
Disparia
That support came with the 9.12 Hotfix drivers.

Haven't seen anyone here post their experience, but over at WidescreenGamingForum and HardOCP some people have posted that it is working. No benches yet.
Posted on Reply
#69
nugzo
JizzlerThat support came with the 9.12 Hotfix drivers.

Haven't seen anyone here post their experience, but over at WidescreenGamingForum and HardOCP some people have posted that it is working. No benches yet.
If that's the case, thats awesome. I wonder if it's possible to use the DVI or HDMI on the
2nd or 3rd video card? or is it not physically possible..
Posted on Reply
#70
GSG-9
JizzlerThat support came with the 9.12 Hotfix drivers.

Haven't seen anyone here post their experience, but over at WidescreenGamingForum and HardOCP some people have posted that it is working. No benches yet.
Rotating monitor support?
Posted on Reply
#72
bryantalpinerunner
Please Help!! Almost Got It!!!

PLEASE HELP!!! I bought the EFX version of ATIs 5670 Card. As you know it had DVI HDMI and Displayport, so without the active adapter i couldnt have all 3 monitors simotaeously. I found Saphires version of the same 5670 card ony difference is it had DVI HDMI and VGA! i thought i found a loophole and wouldnt need the active adapter. After installing the card and the driver it came with, im still have the same issue requiring me to disable one of my monitors to use the 3rd one! NOW IM REALLY UPSET! If anyone has any solution or explanation for this i would really appretiate it!! Thanks in advance - Bryant
Posted on Reply
#73
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
the models with VGA dont support eyefinity - only two screens will work.
Posted on Reply
#74
bryantalpinerunner
Musselsthe models with VGA dont support eyefinity - only two screens will work.
Thanks for the info i knew it was too good to be true. Could anyone suggest the cheapest place to get the active display port adapter thats been confirmed to work?
Posted on Reply
#75
jagd
are you sure mussels ?Because i saw opposite mentioned at some reviews .
bryantalpinerunner you could get active adapter for 64$ from dell before i dont know if it is still possible or not (coupon +bing discount ) ,but it was 5 months ago .
slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1582920
Anyway there are not much active adapters on market . Dell /blizzlink (=accell ) /sapphire look them and get cheapest one. Good luck
Musselsthe models with VGA dont support eyefinity - only two screens will work.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 22nd, 2024 23:39 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts