Friday, November 26th 2010

ASRock Designs LGA1156 Motherboard Based on Intel P67 Chipset

ASRock is known to mix and match sockets and chipsets to come up with some interesting hybrids that give users access to latest features offered by the chipset. A recent example of this is a socket 939 motherboard based on the AMD 785G chipset (read here), which gives users of socket-939 Athlons access to a fast IGP and PCI-Express 2.0. The company's latest such innovation is the P67 Transformer. This is a socket LGA1156 motherboard, it supports existing Core i5/Core i7 "Lynnfield", and Core i3/Core i5 "Clarkdale" processors, but is based on the Intel P67 Express chipset. The board gives users access to some advanced features of the P67 chipset, but won't support LGA1155 processors.

So what's in it for you? Well, the P67 PCH embeds a PCI-Express 2.0 hub compared to P55/H55, which pack an older PCI-Express 1.1 hub. The older hub is known to heavily bottleneck devices such as USB 3.0 and SATA 6 Gb/s controllers that use only a single PCI-E lane (since PCI-E 1.1 has 250 MB/s per direction bandwidth, compared to 500 MB/s on the PCI-E 2.0). So significant is this bottleneck, that some motherboard designers even used bridge chips that convert the P55's PCI-E 1.1 x4 port to two PCI-E 2.0 x1, for USB 3.0 and SATA 6 Gb/s controllers. The PCI-E x16 slots however, are wired to the processor and are Gen 2. ASRock's board hence gives you two USB 3.0 and two SATA 6 Gb/s with an alleviated bus bottleneck.
The P67 Transformer is a standard ATX board with an LGA1156 socket, four DIMMs for dual-channel DDR3, one PCI-Express 2.0 x16 slot for graphics, three PCI-E x1, and two PCI. Storage connectivity includes two SATA 6 Gb/s, four internal SATA 3 Gb/s, eSATA. There are two USB 3.0 ports, a number of USB 2.0 ports, gigabit Ethernet, and 8 channel HD audio. ASRock claims that this board is capable of extremely high memory overclocking capabilities. It masked the rated DDR3 frequency capability on the motherboard, and is challenging you to guess it on its Facebook page. A lucky winners gets one of these boards. The P67 Transformer will be out in early December. A YouTube video related to the board can be watched here.
Source: TweakTown
Add your own comment

38 Comments on ASRock Designs LGA1156 Motherboard Based on Intel P67 Chipset

#26
Arrakis9
asrock > what did the 5 fingers say to the face ?
intel > hmm... not sure
asrock > SLAAAP !!!

if motherboard company's can make things backward compatible like this why cant intel do the same
Posted on Reply
#27
pantherx12
Musselsi've rubbed motherboards on carpet and they've taken no damage. did it with a Q6600 once as well.


the risk of static damage is extremely low.
I tell you what, building up the static in your shoes ( as if you were going to shock another person) can kill hardware though :laugh: if you've actually seen a spark then their could be issues :p



I don't think this board will see light of day, intel will go nuts :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#28
Wile E
Power User
I've zapped cpus, boards, and cards countless times. They never died.

But anyway, back to ASRock:

Their innovation always amazes me, and their quality and OCing has been increasing at a steady clip as well. I might have an ASRock board sometime in my future.
Posted on Reply
#29
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
Musselsi've rubbed motherboards on carpet and they've taken no damage. did it with a Q6600 once as well.

the risk of static damage is extremely low.
Call it a pet peeve, it still pisses me off. Plus, just because you see no immediate effect doesn't mean it won't have a latent failure later on down the line. The static it receives could just be enough to exacerbate it to the point of not working as well as it did, and worse case scenarios not working at all.

As for AsRock I always thought that they were spin off from ASUS, in a sense they're turning out to be more innovative than ASUS.
Posted on Reply
#30
Wile E
Power User
InnocentCriminalCall it a pet peeve, it still pisses me off. Plus, just because you see no immediate effect doesn't mean it won't have a latent failure later on down the line. The static it receives could just be enough to exacerbate it to the point of not working as well as it did, and worse case scenarios not working at all.

As for AsRock I always thought that they were spin off from ASUS, in a sense they're turning out to be more innovative than ASUS.
Considering all the components I have ever zapped never died, and were retired from old age or replacement after years of service, I'd say it's not really a major concern, and is more a theoretical precaution instead of a real threat for the vast majority of components. I'm sure there are really sensitive electronics out there, but honestly, mobos, cpus and gpus don't really fall into that category, unless you are zapping the bare die or something.
Posted on Reply
#31
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
InnocentCriminalCall it a pet peeve, it still pisses me off. Plus, just because you see no immediate effect doesn't mean it won't have a latent failure later on down the line. The static it receives could just be enough to exacerbate it to the point of not working as well as it did, and worse case scenarios not working at all.

As for AsRock I always thought that they were spin off from ASUS, in a sense they're turning out to be more innovative than ASUS.
actually the Q6600 OC'd better after its carpet cleaning.


To me, 'static killed it' is a way of saying 'i have no idea whats wrong, but i want you to pay me for my time anyway'
Posted on Reply
#32
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
MusselsTo me, 'static killed it' is a way of saying 'i have no idea whats wrong, but i want you to pay me for my time anyway'
Maybe you shouldn't use that term then. ;)

I've never had a fatality when not using my anti-static strap or the a-like, it just annoys me that's all. I'm (too) pedantic if you like. Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it won't happen, hence why these guide lines are in place.
Posted on Reply
#33
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
InnocentCriminalMaybe you shouldn't use that term then. ;)

I've never had a fatality when not using my anti-static strap or the a-like, it just annoys me that's all. I'm (too) pedantic if you like. Just because it hasn't happened to you doesn't mean it won't happen, hence why these guide lines are in place.
what guidelines? where are they stated?

the closest it gets is the bags say "ESD sensitive device" and thats about it. the really paranoid buy the wrist straps, the rest of us just dont care.
Posted on Reply
#34
InnocentCriminal
Resident Grammar Amender
Musselswhat guidelines? where are they stated?
If you don't work in IT then it's just common sense, like reading a manual when something fails. I have to do it due to the agreement the company I work for has with Microsoft and other such associations and manufacturers. Paranoid.... no. Tentative, careful, cautious - much better words for describing those that have some decorum of professionalism.
Posted on Reply
#35
pantherx12
Protip: it's the mosfets that are sensitive to static as well as things like cmos and shit.

You don't need guidelines Mussels, just a lil electrical understanding.

Put the wrong voltage/amperage through an electrical device and it can fail.

Static shocks can sometimes have pretty epic charges behind them. ( see lightning for most epic example, enough power to instantly burst things into flames or even explode them if evaporation happens fast enough)

Check out this voltage to spark length data

mm gap
0.5
1
2
3
4
5

volts
2850
4350
7350
10350
13350
16350



Also check this out, whilst it's about static generated with car-seats n shit should be eye opening about just how much voltage can be built up just with fabric lol

www.jci.co.uk/Carseats2.html#5
Posted on Reply
#36
bear jesus
Musselsactually the Q6600 OC'd better after its carpet cleaning.
pantherx12Check out this voltage to spark length data

mm gap
0.5
1
2
3
4
5

volts
2850
4350
7350
10350
13350
16350
Hmmm OC a Q6600 at 16350v :roll: although one major thing is the amperes, static discharges have crazy high voltage but crazy low amp's.... i think :confused: well either way i think i need more coffee :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#37
OneCool
Musselsactually the Q6600 OC'd better after its carpet cleaning.


To me, 'static killed it' is a way of saying 'i have no idea whats wrong, but i want you to pay me for my time anyway'
Nail on the head!
Posted on Reply
#38
RejZoR
Static, unlikely. Power still in components, very likely. That's why i always unplug my system and press ON button again to discharge all capacitors before is tart digging into it. Usually all LED's will lit up and fans will spin a bit. After this is done, you can safely work on any hardware without worrying about anything.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 16:01 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts