Friday, April 29th 2011

Alpenföhn Launches Peter High-Performance VGA Cooler

The cooling specialist Alpenföhn presents the successor of the Heidi VGA Cooler. The new cooler called Alpenföhn Peter utilizes twelve heatpipes and offers a much larger cooling area than the Heidi. In addition, the fan rail allows for up to four fans to be installed, so that the Peter is capable of dissipating up to 420 Watt of heat. For a clean look, the entire surface of the VGA cooler has been Nickle plated.

Modern graphic cards are very complex pieces of engineering, always pushing the envelope in speed, power consumption and thermal design power (TDP). In addition to this, graphic cards have to be cooled while keeping the cooling unit within the constrains of one or two PCI slots, so that it does not block any additional expansion slots of the mainboard. To generate the required cooling performance in such tight quarters a noisy high speed fan tends to be the only option.
An aftermarket cooler like the Alpenföhn Peter in turn is capable of taking on up to 420 Watt, making it the perfect fit for many high-end graphic cards like the AMD RADEON HD6970 or NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580. To guarantee the best compatibility, the Alpenföhn Peter includes various mounting materials which are to be placed on the underside of the cooler. Such a system also makes the Peter future-proof as it can be installed on upcoming cards by simply acquiring the newest mounting brackets.

Twelve Nickle plated, copper heatpipes with a diameter of 6 millimeters guarantee the most efficient transport of heat from the GPU to the cooling fins of the Peter. 84 such Aluminum fins take the heat and pass it on to the surrounding air. This effect is catalyzed with the optional fans. To keep the strain of such the cooler on the mainboard to a minimum, Alpenföhn has included a mounting rail to hold these fans in place.


This rail is attached to the PCI slots and can take up to four 140 mm fans. In such a configuration, two of the cooling units will be placed right above the cooling fins, while the other two are attached facing the side of the heatsink. These are especially effective with cases which feature an opening in the side panel to allow for fresh air to be pulled into the case. You are also free to install smaller fans - if your chassis does not offer enough space for example.

Due to this system of customization, the user is free to create a unique configuration to suit the requirements. This allows for users who prefer silence as well as overclockers to pick their desired fans to cool the Alpenföhn Peter within their system. At launch, Caseking will be offering eight different cooler & fan bundles for the various needs and application scenarios. Besides the Alpenföhn Peter, the user will also receive a set of 30 small heatsinks, which are intended to cool the various components on the graphic card. A mix of different shapes and sizes guarantees the utmost compatibility.

The Alpenföhn Peter - Universal High-End VGA Cooler will be available in mid May, for a price of 54.90 Euro at www.caseking.de. Various bundles containing the Alpenföhn Peter and between two and four fans, for both silent and performance applications will also be available from Caseking at that time. An overview of the various bundles can be found at www.caseking.de/peter. A detailed compatibility list can be viewed in the product description of the Alpenföhn Peter on the Caseking website.
Add your own comment

47 Comments on Alpenföhn Launches Peter High-Performance VGA Cooler

#26
WhiteLotus
I don't know why they bother with the heat pipes, why not just make the base and fins all one unit?
Posted on Reply
#28
Retro*
AsRockWow so many pieces like the MK-13 ( www.prolimatech.com/en/products/detail.asp?id=159&subid=574#showtab ).

Love to try it just for the hell of it. Mine runs great with 2 fans blowing at the cooler and a side fan sucking air from the side of the card to a large side fan.

Main thing people will hate about this is space that it requires in some configs but some zip ties solve some of those issue's.

EDIT
www.alpenfoehn.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=174%3Apeter&catid=61&Itemid=105&lang=en

Alpenföhn Peter (2:30)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhT-IGudH7Y
Thanks for the two good links.
Good that your MK-13 works well for the 6970, which is more efficient and not a heat factory like the 480's I have to contend with.

I had an MK-13 on my first EVGA 480 when they were originally released. I was impressed by the Prolimatech's high-quality construction and the fan bracket (I still experiment with that bracket occasionally).
A bonus for me was that it could be used with the stock 480 heatplate.
But, Prolimatech later changed their compatibility rating to not compatible for the 480. I found that on my 480, it couldn't handle the heat ouput at anything beyond mild gaming, at which point the temps were higher than the stock cooler. I experimented with different fans and configurations, the best I could do was with two 110 cfm fans mounted under the cooler.

The Zalman VF3000F on my EVGA 480, and the oem version on my 480 AMP handle the heat output quite nicely in comparison, from gaming up to anything I can throw at them, including Furmark on extreme burn mode. Which I prefer to avoid using, but I had to see if the VF3000F's could handle it.

Back to the Alpenfohn, looking at the YouTube video, it looks like a damn good cooler. The construction quality appears to be equal to Prolimatech's, which are likely made at the same factory. The bracket looks to be longer than the MK-13's.
Was that a 580 it was installed on? I noticed it used that cards stock heatplate, so that would be a benefit for some.

Hope to see a review comparing it to the AXP, Zalman, and perhaps Thermalright's offerings.
Posted on Reply
#29
AphexDreamer
hmm the orientation of this seems to be that it takes up slots going down?

Can I change the orientation so that it takes slots going up? I have no more room for this if it needs to take up slots going south.

Also how many extra slots does it take up? Two, three or more?
Posted on Reply
#30
wolf
Better Than Native
this needs to be reviewed in comparison to the ACCELERO XTREME, then we will truly know how good it is.
Posted on Reply
#31
fochkoph
Sorry, but not a huge fan of the Prolimatech style fan mounting rails. It just takes up way too much space when there are equally good VGA coolers on the market that only take up three slots max. Take AC's Twin Turbo Pro and my T-Rad2 with dual 92MM Scythe GTs keeps me more than happy with 30C idle and 50C peak temperatures. The Peter does look good though (:p), but I don't see it tempting me away from Thermalright since I also have their monster VRM-R4 cooling solution tacked onto my 5870.
Posted on Reply
#32
Unregistered
micropage7nice. its like a steel bar over your card, from its spec the performance should be good
but why it must be name like that, why dont like 'silver arch' that attract attention than peter, maybe someday they will release 'maemunah' OMG
lol, try "inem" edition it will be epic.

Shame they don't release it for hd 6990, because the reference cooler is so loud
Posted on Edit | Reply
#33
AsRock
TPU addict
fochkophSorry, but not a huge fan of the Prolimatech style fan mounting rails. It just takes up way too much space when there are equally good VGA coolers on the market that only take up three slots max. Take AC's Twin Turbo Pro and my T-Rad2 with dual 92MM Scythe GTs keeps me more than happy with 30C idle and 50C peak temperatures. The Peter does look good though (:p), but I don't see it tempting me away from Thermalright since I also have their monster VRM-R4 cooling solution tacked onto my 5870.
Actually space requirement can be even less pending on how you mount the fans and you can always zip tie some fans to the cooler and believe they have the fan fittings now if you email them for them.

In fact the MK-13 allows me to take the heat directly out of my case too.
Posted on Reply
#34
BababooeyHTJ
I am interested on seeing how this would work with crossfire or sli like mentioned in that video.
Posted on Reply
#35
pantherx12
WhiteLotusI don't know why they bother with the heat pipes, why not just make the base and fins all one unit?
Heat-pipes allow the heat to reach the end of the pipes at around the speed of sound.

It's a much faster process then letting the heat conduct it's self through metal.

Even, rapid distribution FTW!
Posted on Reply
#36
Steevo
A waterblock is better and cheaper. Perhaps cut all the tubes and run coolant through them.
Posted on Reply
#37
bear jesus
SteevoA waterblock is better and cheaper. Perhaps cut all the tubes and run coolant through them.
A water block alone may well be cheaper (depending of brand and model) but it does not cool at all unless you you spend a couple hundred on things like pump, reservoir, tubing, fittings, radiator etc. thus meaning it's far more expensive :p


Although i admit i am curious of how a heat pipe cooler would work if using the pipes to pump water through though :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#39
cheesy999
bear jesusAlthough i admit i am curious of how a heat pipe cooler would work if using the pipes to pump water through though
i expect
1st day - it would work well
2nd day - looks a bit rusty
3rd day - has leaked water all over your mobo
Posted on Reply
#40
OneCool
I cant believe I read a entire thread about dudes talking about how cool their Peter is :eek:







:roll:
Posted on Reply
#41
bear jesus
cheesy999i expect
1st day - it would work well
2nd day - looks a bit rusty
3rd day - has leaked water all over your mobo
:laugh: come on, copper pipes don't degrade that fast.... if they do i better start checking my plumbing :p
OneCoolI cant believe I read a entire thread about dudes talking about how cool their Peter is :eek:

:roll:
:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#42
pantherx12
I have a feeling that in a small space ( I.E GPU heatsink) heat pipes do a better job than water.

( Assuming the entire WC setup is within the same space confines)
Posted on Reply
#43
bear jesus
pantherx12I have a feeling that in a small space ( I.E GPU heatsink) heat pipes do a better job than water.

( Assuming the entire WC setup is within the same space confines)
I would agree, i think the main reason water works better is because it moves the heat to a missive heatsink normally things like 360mm, 420mm, 480mm radiators, imagine getting a heatsink with the same surface area as a 480mm rad on a GPU or CPU cooler. :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#44
pantherx12
bear jesusI would agree, i think the main reason water works better is because it moves the heat to a missive heatsink normally things like 360mm, 420mm, 480mm radiators, imagine getting a heatsink with the same surface area as a 480mm rad on a GPU or CPU cooler. :laugh:
No need for imagination.



I want it bad, even though compatibility will be VERY limited :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#46
pantherx12
Thermalright showing off their skills at 2007 computex I believe.
Posted on Reply
#47
bear jesus
wow idk how i missed that :laugh:

I think i would take a 480mm rad over that.... although if it were available in copper :roll:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 28th, 2024 04:40 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts