Wednesday, January 25th 2012

Why Big Media Really Shut Down MegaUpload: To Kill The Competition

Judging by a report on TechCrunch reporting on a new (conspiracy?) theory why MegaUpload was really shut down, it appears that MegaUpload was on the verge of launching a new business model for artists, which would have blasted the likes of the RIAA and the big music companies they represent into irrelevance. That of course, they could not allow. The 'piracy' argument was a smokescreen.
MegaUpload, founded by Kim Dotcom, was about to launch a new music store and DIY distribution service called Megabox, which would have completely disrupted the established music industry. MegaUpload was in a legal war with the RIAA & MPAA, with MegaUpload having just sued Universal Music Group for wrongly blocking their recent star-studded YouTube campaign and things were getting very ugly indeed. However, it looks like the quiet launch of Megabox would have been a step too far, so they tore MegaUpload apart. TechCrunch explains how Megabox would have worked:

"Dotcom described Megabox as Megaupload's iTunes competitor, which would even eventually offer free premium movies via Megamovie, a site set to launch in 2012. This service would take Megaupload from being just a digital locker site to a full-fledged player in the digital content game.

The kicker was Megabox would cater to unsigned artists and allow anyone to sell their creations while allowing the artist to retain 90% of the earnings. Or, artists could even giveaway their songs and would be paid through a service called Megakey. "Yes that's right, we will pay artists even for free downloads. The Megakey business model has been tested with over a million users and it works," Kim Dotcom told TorrentFreak in December. Megabox was planning on bypassing the labels, RIAA, and the entire music establishment."

MegaUpload was not the first site to try this business model, one far more generous to the artists that actually produce this precious content than the established order that claims to be protecting them. However, they were huge, being the 13th most visited site on the internet, taking 4% of worldwide internet traffic and had a massive 180 million registered users with over 50 million visiting the site daily. Hence they were likely to have pulled it off. Bad news for the all-powerful established music businesses and something they couldn't let happen. Right now, Kim Dotcom and several other executives from the now defunct site and brand are awaiting trial on several charges, including various counts of piracy, racketeering and money laundering. TechCrunch described MegaUpload's demise beautifully:

"It seems they flew too close to the sun. High on success and a half a world away in New Zealand and Hong Kong, they attempted to take on the music industry head-on. Now they're in jail."
Add your own comment

108 Comments on Why Big Media Really Shut Down MegaUpload: To Kill The Competition

#76
TheMailMan78
Big Member
jmcslobAnd at the same time when should one mans work become part of mans collective accomplishments.....Currently it's 105 years....

I think it should be when he's dead or if he dies young when his kids reach 18 and his widow is retirement age and not when his great great great fat ass unworthy Grandchildren are ready to retire.
105 years is a good number. If its when he is dead you will have a spike in murders. 105 years is a safety net for artists and their children. You just want to kill me don't ya jmcslob!
Posted on Reply
#77
gorg_graggel
if those artist (and their children) would get a substantial cut from the sales of their work, that would actually be a valid argument... :p
Posted on Reply
#78
TheMailMan78
Big Member
gorg_graggelif those artist (and their children) would get a substantial cut from the sales of their work, that would actually be a valid argument... :p
They do. If they don't they are dumb. I pay my mortgage from copyrights.
Posted on Reply
#80
brandonwh64
Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
WrigleyvillainFunny...no sign of qubit.
Funny indeed!
Posted on Reply
#81
gorg_graggel
TheMailMan78They do. If they don't they are dumb. I pay my mortgage from copyrights.
is that your only income?
Posted on Reply
#82
TheMailMan78
Big Member
gorg_graggelis that your only income?
My main source yes. I keep gaining more so one day I can retire or even do this crap for fun like I did when I was a kid.
Posted on Reply
#83
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
WrigleyvillainFunny...no sign of qubit.
Well, as much as I'd like to be on here 24/7, that's unfortunately not possible. :toast:

That damned thing called Real Life gets in the way! :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#84
digibucc
TheMailMan78My main source yes. I keep gaining more so one day I can retire or even do this crap for fun like I did when I was a kid.
so what stock art sites? how do you actually get a piece of work out there so it earns royalty?

and how can i do it with code? ;)
Posted on Reply
#85
NAVI_Z
its fun reading you guys going back n forth !.....
Posted on Reply
#86
gorg_graggel
TheMailMan78My main source yes. I keep gaining more so one day I can retire or even do this crap for fun like I did when I was a kid.
you seem to have struck a good deal, or things here in germany are very different, dunno...
of all the musicians i know, there is just one who can make a living out of it and doesn't need to have any secondary source of income...and he hasn't signed a contract with any label, he earns his money through live performances only...
and the others aren't just all stupid...
NAVI_Zits fun reading you guys going back n forth !.....
well, not every discussion has to be about flaming until somebody gets banned... ;)
Posted on Reply
#87
TheMailMan78
Big Member
digibuccso what stock art sites? how do you actually get a piece of work out there so it earns royalty?

and how can i do it with code? ;)
Publisher. Also you can make royalty's off of code. Ask W1zz. ;) He did something call GPU-Z or something. Don't remember. lol
gorg_graggelyou seem to have struck a good deal, or things here in germany are very different, dunno...
of all the musicians i know, there is just one who can make a living out of it and doesn't need to have any secondary source of income...and he hasn't signed a contract with any label, he earns his money through live performances only...
and the others aren't just all stupid.
Im not in the music industry.
Posted on Reply
#88
digibucc
i thought GPU-z was distributed for free, where do royalties come from then?
Posted on Reply
#89
TheMailMan78
Big Member
digibucci thought GPU-z was distributed for free, where do royalties come from then?
When people want to use his code in thier own software. MSI, ASUS and others use GPU-Z code in thier own proprietary software AFAIK.
Posted on Reply
#90
digibucc
TheMailMan78When people want to use his code in thier own software. MSI, ASUS and others use GPU-Z code in thier own proprietary software AFAIK.
that's the thought i just had, sounds right. ;)
Posted on Reply
#91
DannibusX
entropy13He invested NZ$10million in government bonds however, in exchange for residency.
Aye, but he never actually got it.
Posted on Reply
#92
R_1
Man , you are like pussies - making fun of serious s@it. You simply don't have the needed war experience to understand slavery and when your rights are taken from you by force. Keep on laughing MailMan, when some one is approaching you from behind...
Posted on Reply
#93
TheMailMan78
Big Member
R_1Man , you are like pussies - making fun of serious s@it. You simply don't have the needed war experience to understand slavery and when your rights are taken from you by force. Keep on laughing MailMan, when some one is approaching you from behind...
Bulgarian Ninjas?
Posted on Reply
#94
R_1
Yep, a man who understands what a total state control is. It is painful and hurts a lot.
Posted on Reply
#95
TheMailMan78
Big Member
R_1Yep, a man who understands what a total state control is. It is painful and hurts a lot.
Sounds kinky.
Posted on Reply
#96
R_1
Freeedom... I don't want from the same again!!!
Posted on Reply
#97
The_
There have been numerous reports thru history, when the little guy invents something that will threaten the 'Big Corporations' income, that they are taken to court or discredited in some way or another. For example, read the story of Royal Raymond Rife (google it).
Posted on Reply
#98
digibucc
yeah but the difference here is we KNOW he was an unscrupulous douchebag.

that doesn't mean they weren't trying something that could legitimately frighten the riaa, but it does mean any doubt about his character is pretty accurate imo.
Posted on Reply
#99
The_
digibuccyeah but the difference here is we KNOW he was an unscrupulous douchebag.

that doesn't mean they weren't trying something that could legitimately frighten the riaa, but it does mean any doubt about his character is pretty accurate imo.
Really? Or do you only know what you are told and/or groomed to believe?
Posted on Reply
#100
TheMailMan78
Big Member
The_Really? Or do you only know what you are told and/or groomed to believe?
Or maybe you just follow a populist ideal? I mean really...who knows. ;)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 22nd, 2024 20:57 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts