Wednesday, January 25th 2012

Why Big Media Really Shut Down MegaUpload: To Kill The Competition

Judging by a report on TechCrunch reporting on a new (conspiracy?) theory why MegaUpload was really shut down, it appears that MegaUpload was on the verge of launching a new business model for artists, which would have blasted the likes of the RIAA and the big music companies they represent into irrelevance. That of course, they could not allow. The 'piracy' argument was a smokescreen.
MegaUpload, founded by Kim Dotcom, was about to launch a new music store and DIY distribution service called Megabox, which would have completely disrupted the established music industry. MegaUpload was in a legal war with the RIAA & MPAA, with MegaUpload having just sued Universal Music Group for wrongly blocking their recent star-studded YouTube campaign and things were getting very ugly indeed. However, it looks like the quiet launch of Megabox would have been a step too far, so they tore MegaUpload apart. TechCrunch explains how Megabox would have worked:

"Dotcom described Megabox as Megaupload's iTunes competitor, which would even eventually offer free premium movies via Megamovie, a site set to launch in 2012. This service would take Megaupload from being just a digital locker site to a full-fledged player in the digital content game.

The kicker was Megabox would cater to unsigned artists and allow anyone to sell their creations while allowing the artist to retain 90% of the earnings. Or, artists could even giveaway their songs and would be paid through a service called Megakey. "Yes that's right, we will pay artists even for free downloads. The Megakey business model has been tested with over a million users and it works," Kim Dotcom told TorrentFreak in December. Megabox was planning on bypassing the labels, RIAA, and the entire music establishment."

MegaUpload was not the first site to try this business model, one far more generous to the artists that actually produce this precious content than the established order that claims to be protecting them. However, they were huge, being the 13th most visited site on the internet, taking 4% of worldwide internet traffic and had a massive 180 million registered users with over 50 million visiting the site daily. Hence they were likely to have pulled it off. Bad news for the all-powerful established music businesses and something they couldn't let happen. Right now, Kim Dotcom and several other executives from the now defunct site and brand are awaiting trial on several charges, including various counts of piracy, racketeering and money laundering. TechCrunch described MegaUpload's demise beautifully:

"It seems they flew too close to the sun. High on success and a half a world away in New Zealand and Hong Kong, they attempted to take on the music industry head-on. Now they're in jail."
Add your own comment

108 Comments on Why Big Media Really Shut Down MegaUpload: To Kill The Competition

#101
The_
TheMailMan78Or maybe you just follow a populist ideal? I mean really...who knows. ;)
I choose only to believe what I experience. And everything I read on the internet.
Posted on Reply
#103
gorg_graggel
TheMailMan78Publisher. Also you can make royalty's off of code. Ask W1zz. ;) He did something call GPU-Z or something. Don't remember. lol



Im not in the music industry.
duh, i was talking about people creating stuff, not people making money of other peoples creations...:wtf:
Posted on Reply
#104
TheMailMan78
Big Member
gorg_graggelduh, i was talking about people creating stuff, not people making money of other peoples creations...:wtf:
I know. I create stuff. I create things other people want to use but not pay full price for. So they pay me royalties. When they do sell something I get a cut. If they don't I make no money.

See my avatar? I did that messing around for TPU. Its not even that nice but thats kinda what I do. If you want people to start paying for exclusive rights for things get ready to not afford ANYTHING. Royalties make things affordable. Ill be more then happy to charge for exclusive rights.
Posted on Reply
#105
qubit
Overclocked quantum bit
TheMailMan78When people want to use his code in thier own software. MSI, ASUS and others use GPU-Z code in thier own proprietary software AFAIK.
Serious? I didn't know his code got used like that. W1zz is an even bigger cheese than I thought. :respect:
Posted on Reply
#106
johnspack
Here For Good!
Why isn't rapidshare shut down? There are sites specifically to search rapidshare links for warez. Rapidshare hosts copyrighted material. I wonder who sent the american government more shut up money.... Money talks, and bu****it walks. Just bloody amazing isnt it. How a country can covet money so much.
Posted on Reply
#107
gorg_graggel
TheMailMan78I know. I create stuff. I create things other people want to use but not pay full price for. So they pay me royalties. When they do sell something I get a cut. If they don't I make no money.

See my avatar? I did that messing around for TPU. Its not even that nice but thats kinda what I do. If you want people to start paying for exclusive rights for things get ready to not afford ANYTHING. Royalties make things affordable. Ill be more then happy to charge for exclusive rights.
i see, i was confused by the "publisher" above...

anyway, royalties per se, is not what needs a debate.
just how much big labels get vs. what the artists get.
models like that from the news would bring more competition and "big media" would have an incentive to change their payment policies...
Posted on Reply
#108
tedy
This is pure fasicm!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 22nd, 2024 20:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts