Tuesday, October 17th 2006
SAMSUNG Flash Solid State Drives (SSDs) Fully Compatible with Windows
Samsung Electronics, today announced that its three solid state disk (SSD) drives have been officially recognized by Microsoft Corporation as fully qualified Windows-compatible peripherals. After thorough testing by its Windows Hardware Qualification Lab (WHQL), Microsoft has validated that Samsung SSDs meet all of the requirements for storage media in a Windows operating environment. Microsoft has certified a 32GB 1.8-inch sized Samsung SSD, a 32GB slim-type Samsung SSD (53.6x70.6x3.0mm) and a 16GB small-type SSD (56x48x3.8mm). The new sizes support the physical requirements of sub-notebook PCs. The SSDs' substantial size and weight advantages are expected to further encourage a steady adoption of SSDs into a number of PC applications, such as in ultra mobile PCs, "ruggedized" notebooks and special industrial applications.
Source:
Samsung
3 Comments on SAMSUNG Flash Solid State Drives (SSDs) Fully Compatible with Windows
Now, ones like GigaByte's IRAM (SATA BUS BASED) & HyperOS' HyperOS III (PATA UltraATA/100 BUS BASED) are decent enough & do that afaik, nowadays (you can load you OS onto them & bootup a machine from them).
BUT, the one I am waiting for (DDRDrive X1 PCI-express bus based)?
It's THE ONE as far as I am concerned (faster RAM than what I have in mine, PC-133 SDRAM, whereas the DDRDrive uses DDR-1 RAM) & also faster bus type (faster than what I have on mine, PCI 2.2, whereas the DDRDrive uses a PCI-E x1 slot)?
It means the DDRDrive x1 will "cure" things I see in mine currently - mainly, faster "BURST" speeds, because of the faster RAM type & bus type used.
APK
P.S.=> I think the ones I mention will be superior to FLASH based ones, on speed AND longevity (because even though FLASH write/rewrite has been improved? It will have limits on how many writes are performed on it anyhow)
BUT - on speed though? I am NOT 110% sure if USB 2.0 (480mb/sec) or PCI-e (larger iirc, but not sure what rate is here) have huge differences as far as bus burst speeds max, but my money's on PCI-e here... apk