Friday, January 15th 2016

Intel Reports Full-Year Revenue of $55.4 Billion, Q4 Revenue of $14.9 Billion

Intel Corporation today reported full-year revenue of $55.4 billion, operating income of $14.0 billion, net income of $11.4 billion and EPS of $2.33. The company generated approximately $19.0 billion in cash from operations, paid dividends of $4.6 billion and used $3.0 billion to repurchase 96 million shares of stock.

For the fourth quarter, Intel posted revenue of $14.9 billion, operating income of $4.3 billion, net income of $3.6 billion and EPS of 74 cents. The company generated approximately $5.4 billion in cash from operations, paid dividends of $1.1 billion, and used $525 million to repurchase 17 million shares of stock.
"Our results for the fourth quarter marked a strong finish to the year and were consistent with expectations," said Brian Krzanich, Intel CEO. "Our 2015 results demonstrate that Intel is evolving and our strategy is working. This year, we'll continue to drive growth by powering the infrastructure for an increasingly smart and connected world."

Full-Year 2015 Business Unit Trends
  • Client Computing Group revenue of $32.2 billion, down 8 percent from 2014.
  • Data Center Group revenue of $16.0 billion, up 11 percent from 2014.
  • Internet of Things Group revenue of $2.3 billion, up 7 percent from 2014.
  • Software and services operating segments revenue of $2.2 billion, down 2 percent from 2014.
  • Non-Volatile Memory Solution Group revenue up 21 percent from 2014
Q4 Business Unit Trends
  • Client Computing Group revenue of $8.8 billion, up 3 percent sequentially and down 1 percent year-over-year.
  • Data Center Group revenue of $4.3 billion, up 4 percent sequentially and up 5 percent year-over-year.
  • Internet of Things Group revenue of $625 million, up 8 percent sequentially and up 6 percent year-over-year.
  • Software and services operating segments revenue of $543 million, down 2 percent sequentially and down 3 percent year-over-year.
  • Non-Volatile Memory Solution Group revenue was flat sequentially and up 10 percent year-over-year.
Business Outlook
Intel's Business Outlook does not include the potential impact of any business combinations, asset acquisitions, divestitures, strategic investments and other significant transactions that may be completed after January 14. Please note: Our Full-Year 2016 and Q1 2016 Business Outlook includes the expected results of our recently completed acquisition of Altera, an additional week in the first quarter due to 2016 being a 53-week year and a change in the estimated useful lives for our machinery and equipment in our factories from four to five years.

The acquisition of Altera was completed in early fiscal year 2016, which means that the 2016 guidance includes the expected results for the FPGA business. As a result of the Altera acquisition, we have acquisition-related charges that are primarily non-cash. Our guidance for the first quarter and full-year 2016 include both GAAP and non-GAAP estimates.
Add your own comment

19 Comments on Intel Reports Full-Year Revenue of $55.4 Billion, Q4 Revenue of $14.9 Billion

#1
64K
Intel =

Posted on Reply
#2
RCoon
With $11 Billion profit I don't see why they don't just build a war chest and start invading businesses/countries.
Posted on Reply
#3
Prima.Vera
Because of the monopoly on x86 market this is what you get...
Posted on Reply
#4
vega22
RCoonWith $11 Billion profit I don't see why they don't just build a war chest and start invading businesses/countries.
with that much money they could be and just paying to keep it out the media xD

is that enough to buy amd every 2 weeks?
Posted on Reply
#7
Fluffmeister
Damn... an x86 license must be like a noose around the neck.
Posted on Reply
#8
Delta6326
And yet we can't get solder on 6700k... and still at $420 with msrp of $350. I've had my Z170, 2x m.2 ssd's and 32GB Trident Z since Black Friday and still waiting on 6700k to drop to at least $370 or less.............

Come on Intel!!! I've had it with my Q6600! I want to give you money and you can't produce fast enough!
Posted on Reply
#9
hat
Enthusiast
Using solder would result in a net loss of $12.67 billion :rolleyes::laugh:
Posted on Reply
#10
esrever
Delta6326And yet we can't get solder on 6700k... and still at $420 with msrp of $350. I've had my Z170, 2x m.2 ssd's and 32GB Trident Z since Black Friday and still waiting on 6700k to drop to at least $370 or less.............
Thats the whole reason why they are making so much money.
Posted on Reply
#11
chaosmassive
with fraction of intel's revenue, they could easily wipe out AMD and Nvidia, if they want and laws allow it.
Posted on Reply
#12
Hood
RCoonWith $11 Billion profit I don't see why they don't just build a war chest and start invading businesses/countries.
They started that long ago - remember when AMD had a bright future? Intel purposely almost bankrupted them a few years ago, lately I think they see the value of "competition", so they were allowed to live, as long as they posed no real threat to the monopoly. Also Intel's (financial) invasion of china has started...
Posted on Reply
#13
Fourstaff
HoodThey started that long ago - remember when AMD had a bright future? Intel purposely almost bankrupted them a few years ago, lately I think they see the value of "competition", so they were allowed to live, as long as they posed no real threat to the monopoly. Also Intel's (financial) invasion of china has started...
Survival of the fittest, nature is very effective at removing the weakest.
Posted on Reply
#14
esrever
FourstaffSurvival of the fittest, nature is very effective at removing the weakest.
It's easy to survive when you can buy your survival.
Posted on Reply
#15
Xzibit
Those stock coolers were expensive.

Imaging how much they would profit getting rid of them across the product line.
Posted on Reply
#16
Kurt Maverick
....they could turn some of that into lowering the prices of the Broadwell-E, the bastards :P
Posted on Reply
#17
silkstone
FourstaffSurvival of the fittest, nature is very effective at removing the weakest.
Until they wipe out everything and anything that could threaten their survival. At that point, they could just become fat, slow and flightless.
Posted on Reply
#18
64K
Kurt Maverick....they could turn some of that into lowering the prices of the Broadwell-E, the bastards :p
The problem is they don't have to and the chips will still sell.

AMD will be reporting 2015 Earnings after the markets close today (about 1/2 hour) and it's looking ugly. 2016 should be a little better but if AMD can't offer some decent competition for Intel then prices even for mainstream Intel chips may go up as well in the future.
Posted on Reply
#19
Dbiggs9
I would buy into AMD at there Current price..........
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 09:59 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts