Thursday, January 5th 2017

This Video Clip of Radeon Vega Running DOOM at 4K is Glorious

by
btarunr
 Discuss (75 Comments)
AMD today posted this video clip showing an AMD Radeon "Vega" graphics card running "Doom" (2016) at 4K Ultra HD, with all its details maxed out. Vega made short work of the AAA game with its Vulkan renderer enabled, clocking frame-rates of around 70 frames per second. This kind of performance should put "Vega" firmly in the high-end segment of graphics cards, when it hits the shelves a little later this year.

Related News

Add your own comment

75 Comments on This Video Clip of Radeon Vega Running DOOM at 4K is Glorious

#1
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
That's a solid 10-20FPS more on that level than my 480 gets overclocked without AA/AF on. I would have preferred some actual gameplay like with things shooting at the character so I could you know maybe actually see how it does though.
Posted on Reply
#2
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
AMD is in full-scale marketing mode. That's a good thing I feel! While they've been hype in the past, I feel actual marketing has been a miss.
Posted on Reply
#3
phanbuey
There will be no less than 3 more DOOM demos prior to release.
Posted on Reply
#4
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
Oh noes... Titan X gets 80fps average..... and Pascal doesn't do Vulkan.

I'd love to see a DX11 title.....
Posted on Reply
#5
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
How fast is Pascal?
Posted on Reply
#6
phanbuey
the54thvoidOh noes... Titan X gets 80fps average..... and Pascal doesn't do Vulkan.

I'd love to see a DX11 title.....
BUT IT RUNS DOOM! DOOOOOOOOOOOOM!

If you're not exclusively playing Doom, you don't deserve this card.
Posted on Reply
#7
m1dg3t
the54thvoidOh noes... Titan X gets 80fps average..... and Pascal doesn't do Vulkan.

I'd love to see a DX11 title.....
You think this is final silicon/drivers? I think we're still a while out from an actual release but this does look promising. I hope it's priced well and the 7950 equivalent isn't too cut, I could use an upgrade LoLoLoL
Posted on Reply
#8
Shihab
I'm all hyped for a card that might make me ditch Nvland 'n all, but what's with the Buzzfeed-ish title?
Posted on Reply
#9
P4-630
Nothing special. "Doom" "Vulcan" again......

We want to see results without Vulcan and with DX11!!
Posted on Reply
#10
m1dg3t
cdawallThat's a solid 10-20FPS more on that level than my 480 gets overclocked without AA/AF on. I would have preferred some actual gameplay like with things shooting at the character so I could you know maybe actually see how it does though.
Looks smooth to me?


ShihabyoooI'm all hyped for a card that might make me ditch Nvland 'n all, but what's with the Buzzfeed-ish title?
Bta seems to love to sensationalize things lately :)
Posted on Reply
#11
Dave65
I really hope this is a win for AMD because it will help pricing in both markets..
Posted on Reply
#12
TheOne
-.- If AMD really wants to show off Vega they should pick titles that they currently struggle with.
Posted on Reply
#13
IceScreamer
TheOne-.- If AMD really wants to show off Vega they should pick titles that they currently struggle with.
I'm all with you on that one, but marketing always tries to show the product in the best light possible so choosing DOOM is understandable.
Posted on Reply
#14
ShurikN
We still don't know if this is smaller Vega or the larger one.
Posted on Reply
#15
m1dg3t
TheOne-.- If AMD really wants to show off Vega they should pick titles that they currently struggle with.
You realize they are running with modified Fury drivers ATM?
Posted on Reply
#16
RejZoR
I'm quite hyped for Vega. They just need to give us damn Fast V-Sync mode. They are so quiet about it and they just keep on pushing stupid FreeSync.
Posted on Reply
#17
TheMailMan78
Big Member
That's great. Lets see it run BF1 in DX12 at 4k.
Posted on Reply
#18
xkm1948
Pfff. Vulkan? They should show DX10 or DX9 games performance. Bring out Crysis 1! Or FarCry1!

Who cares about new API right? As long as AMD hardware excels at them they are useless. Well not until new gen GeForce cards also have great new API support. Then it will be "ZOMG it is so cool Vulkan/DX12/AsyncCompute sooooo important this is the way done right" etc. etc.
Posted on Reply
#19
TheOne
m1dg3tYou realize they are running with modified Fury drivers ATM?
Using Doom doesn't really demonstrate the power of Vega, it's not that taxing of a game and AMD GPU's already have an edge, so this demo is kind of meh, if they used games they have trouble with and can get some decent FPS then that would be something, using unoptimized drivers would only make them look better.
Posted on Reply
#20
HossHuge
I hope people read the Cautionary Statement before making assumptions.
Posted on Reply
#21
the54thvoid
Super Intoxicated Moderator
ShurikNWe still don't know if this is smaller Vega or the larger one.
10 seconds in he clearly says
flagship vega
clear enough? It's the top Vega card. As for how fast is Titan X (@Frick )

90fps average


Posted on Reply
#22
Joss
rtwjunkieAMD is in full-scale marketing mode. That's a good thing I feel! While they've been hype in the past
Marketing or hype, I don't see the difference.
All this reminds me too much of the 290x launch (if we can call that a launch) or the Fury (who chose the name, the guy from the video above?); I'm not very optimistic, but sincerely hope I'm wrong.
Posted on Reply
#23
TheoneandonlyMrK
RejZoRI'm quite hyped for Vega. They just need to give us damn Fast V-Sync mode. They are so quiet about it and they just keep on pushing stupid FreeSync.
They're clearly not going to do nvidias proprietary fastsync why do you keep banging on about it in every AMD GPU thread , you have not actually used freesync yet are an expert in its issues (although I've not seen any issues using it) ,are you aware they are pushing freesync 2 with Vega ,Nvidia have gsync HDR now too.
Posted on Reply
#24
ShurikN
the54thvoid10 seconds in he clearly says



clear enough? It's the top Vega card. As for how fast is Titan X (@Frick )

90fps average


Yea, and the Titan test was done on a 5960X@4.4 with DDR4@2133, Vega demo was on a 4790 with DDR3@1600, unknown CPU clock, possibly stock.
Second, there were a lot of inconsistencies with the settings used with OGL-Vulkan transition.
Just like you posted that, I could post TH review where TX P has 77fps average.
And what do we get... nothing.
Posted on Reply
#25
Dethroy
Looks like the framerate is dropping below 50 fps. I could be wrong though - very hard to tell on the phone.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 13:25 EST change timezone

Latest GPU Drivers

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts