Wednesday, January 10th 2007

PSUs edge closer to 2000W


More demanding graphics cards have been the main culprit for extra power requirements over recent years, with CPUs starting to become slightly more efficient. However, both ULTRA and OCZ are preparing for the future by working towards the 2000W mark. OCZ took the approach of combining two 900W PSUs inside an enormous external chassis which connects to a smaller, standard sized unit. This results in the image you can see on the left above. ULTRA's approach was noticeably different, using a single chassis system (larger than a standard PSU) with separate power elements for the 12V, providing 150 amps of current to anything connected to that rail, shown on the right. Because the US electric current is specified at 15A per socket, both PSUs would each need two cables when being used there, but in Europe one socket should be sufficient.
Source: The Inquirer
Add your own comment

29 Comments on PSUs edge closer to 2000W

#26
ryboto
aren't the quad fx amd systems the only ones that even draw more than 500W??? A decent 600-700W psu is the absolute maximum that anyone should ever consider. The system in my sig can be powered by a single 300W psu.
Posted on Reply
#27
TXcharger
damn i could almost run a welder off one of those
Posted on Reply
#28
unsmart
newtekie1RickyG512, lets see here, who am I going to go with here, random people on a forum that say one rail with 150A is better, or the people that make the standards and have been researching and learning about the issue for years who say that a single rail shouldn't have more than 20A?

Which would you go with?
The main issue with dual rials is that some manufacturers where labeling the rail by there max power draw they where fused for. Lets say you got a PSU with dual rails that where rated both at 15a. You would assume there would be 30a total, thats where the problem comes in. The 15a is only where the over current kicks in on each rail. The power is really draw form one transformer[ lets say 24a] and then divided by over current protection at 15a each. So you max draw is really 24a but you can pull 15a off of each rail just not at the same time. A lot of manufacturers now suggest single rials[ ATI/AMD for one]and many PSU makers have given up certifications to put all the current on one rail. The 20a limit was there to prevent burnt pins due to over current but it was solved by adding more pins[ 24 an 2x2 also the 8 pin cpu] to draw power form. There are true multi rail PSUs that have separate circuits and provide more then just two fused leads, like better stability under load. The dual rail movement got a bad rap and it was not just because of the low enders, some trusted names where doing the same thing.
Posted on Reply
#29
Lazzer408
Dual rail seems like it could be marketing trickery to advertise 2x15 when really it's 24/2 = 2x24 (as in unsmart's example) but the "average idiot" customer wouldn't think that far. I could see the benifit of dual rail as one surge from one rail wouldn't cause dropouts in the other IF the 2 rails had proper independant regulators and filter caps to address the surges.

I have a single Antec trupower 480w running a prescott o/c'd from 3.4 to 4ghz, 512mbx4 ddr-2, 4 sata harddrives, 2 dvd/rw combo drives, 6 case fans and a single x1950 pro. Not a bad accomplishment for a 480w. I added a thermaltake powerexpress 250 now that I have crossfire. The 480w wouldn't have ran like that forever -but- the fan controller in the psu doesn't seem to think the temps are that high because it's sitting at 950rpm. A name brand 550 would seem more then enough for the average user running a single highend card like a x1950xtx. For SLI or Crossfire I would suggest a 650-800w depending on how much other crap is running off it.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 21st, 2025 07:23 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts