Monday, September 4th 2017

Philips Announces the 328P8K 8K UHD Monitor With HDR 400

Philips is now the second company to announce a mass-market 8K monitor with the 328P8K. It boasts of a 31.5" IPS panel with a mind-boggling 7680 x 4320 resolution, and delivers on the professional space with 100% AdobeRGB/SRGB color space support. Since availability of these panels is still scarce, this is likely the same panel that Dell is using on their own 8K UltraSharp UP3218K monitor.

Philips is boasting of something they are calling HDR 400 support in this monitor, due to its brightness being set at 400 nits. This would be enough for AMD's baseline luminance requirements for FreeSync 2 HDR, but stands a far cry behind the HDR10 standard with its 1,000 nit peak brightness target (not to speak about Dolby Vision's 4,000 peak brightness target). Contrast ratio should stand at 1300:1, with a 60 Hz refresh ratio. Connectors-wise, the new Philips 328P8K 8K UHD Monitor boasts of 2x DisplayPort 1.3 (needed for display of the resolution, and in a bid to avoid using DP 1.4 with Display Stream Compression 1.2 and ensure a flawless and accurate image quality) and features a USB hub with USB type-A and type-C ports. Expect this panel to come in at a pretty penny, most likely in the same ballpark as Dell's offering, which now costs less than $4,000. Expect Philips' take on 8K to be available for purchase around Q1 2018.
Source: AnandTech
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Philips Announces the 328P8K 8K UHD Monitor With HDR 400

#26
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
nemesis.ieEr, not really, no, it will still be the same % slower/faster overall assuming perfect scaling. But it will also will depend on how well the drivers do actually scale and how many cards the chosen system/vendor will support.

For example if Vega drivers were to scale better the % slower would actually decrease, conversly, if they were poorer. But outside the scaling factor, the overal % does not change because you are adding more cards.
3 cards that are 10-15% slower each are going to be 30-45% slower overall vs 3 of the competing cards. It isn't just one card that is slower all of them are, those losses don't magically disappear when you have more.
Posted on Reply
#27
nemesis.ie
No, they are not, they will still be 10-15% slower overall versus 3 of the other cards that the single card was that much slower than (assuming equal scaling).

There is no difference as it is a PERCENTAGE - a relative PROPORTION.

Work it out yourself. Take a single Ti and call it 100FPS and the V64 at 90 FPS, then work out the % for that and the % for 3 x each ...
Posted on Reply
#28
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
nemesis.ieNo, they are not, they will still be 10-15% slower overall versus 3 of the other cards that the single card was that much slower than (assuming equal scaling).

There is no difference as it is a PERCENTAGE - a relative PROPORTION.

Work it out yourself. Take a single Ti and call it 100FPS and the V64 at 90 FPS, then work out the % for that and the % for 3 x each ...
You are correct I was adding frames together not percentages. That is my bad, however 10-15% compounds pretty damn quickly let's take your example and be more realistic. One 1080Ti at 100FPS and one V64 at 80FPS, that means two would be 200 vs 160 and three would be 300 vs 240FPS. Those are pretty big differences.
Posted on Reply
#29
nemesis.ie
LOL.

It's still the same % difference though. ;) It maybe looks worse wit ha 60fps gap, but isn't really.
Posted on Reply
#30
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
nemesis.ieLOL.

It's still the same % difference though. ;) It maybe looks worse wit ha 60fps gap, but isn't really.
It is 60FPS is not a small number.
Posted on Reply
#31
nemesis.ie
When it's 240 to 300 it isn't, it's still a small %. :)

If it was 10 to 70 it would be a major thing but then that would be a much larger % difference.

Anyway, lets leave that there as it's got a bit O/T at this point! :)
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 29th, 2024 16:42 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts