Sunday, September 10th 2017
Intel Intros Core i9-7920X HEDT Processor
Intel today announced availability of its Core i9-7920X high-end desktop (HEDT) processor in the LGA2066 package, designed for motherboards based on the Intel X299 Express chipset. The chip is priced at USD $1,199 in the retail market, a $200 premium over its previous flagship part, the i9-7900X. The new i9-7920X is a 12-core/24-thread processor based on 14 nm "Skylake-X" silicon, and has a rated TDP of 140W.
The Core i9-7920X features a nominal clock speed of 2.90 GHz, with a maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 4.30 GHz, and Turbo Boost Max 3.0 frequency of 4.40 GHz. It features 1 MB of dedicated L2 cache per core, and 16.50 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip features the full 44-lane PCI-Express gen 3.0 root complex available on the silicon, and its quad-channel DDR4 integrated memory interface, supporting up to 128 GB of memory.
The Core i9-7920X features a nominal clock speed of 2.90 GHz, with a maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 4.30 GHz, and Turbo Boost Max 3.0 frequency of 4.40 GHz. It features 1 MB of dedicated L2 cache per core, and 16.50 MB of shared L3 cache. The chip features the full 44-lane PCI-Express gen 3.0 root complex available on the silicon, and its quad-channel DDR4 integrated memory interface, supporting up to 128 GB of memory.
22 Comments on Intel Intros Core i9-7920X HEDT Processor
It's a shame because those products can really stand on their own as competitive without the manipulation and exaggeration of specification.
And RAM frequency ultimately still relies on the integrated memory controller on the CPU. And 3200mhz is definitely supported on that front from the looks of it.
Intel is listing their Skylake-X CPUs as having support for just 2666 as well.
On another note, when is TPU going to review these HEDT chips from both AMD and Intel? would like to read head to head comparison(workstation use case only) of the 12 core offerings from both manufacturers.
www.amd.com/en/products/cpu/amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x
ark.intel.com/products/126240/Intel-Core-i9-7920X-X-series-Processor-16_50M-Cache-up-to-4_30-GHz
So both products from both teams officially support 2666/2667Mhz maximum. So I agree that it isn't necessarily representative.
Less fanboy please, more fact. If it's that we were critical of the condition of mobos at launch (we were), AMD needs to grow up. What, does fairness hurt now?
You trolls also need to make up your mind who we're biased towards. With one side screaming "advertorial!" and the other screaming "Intel/Nvidia shills!" I can't see straight anymore...
Or do they... ? :cry:
:rockout: Eager to see your next thread on high-capacity ram at the limit!
www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Arnold-for-Maya-CPU-Comparison-Skylake-X-vs-Threadripper-1020/#BenchmarkResults
www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/V-Ray-CPU-Comparison-Skylake-X-vs-Threadripper-1018/#BenchmarkResults
www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/KeyShot-7-CPU-Comparison-Skylake-X-vs-Threadripper-1019/#Conclusion
www.pugetsystems.com/labs/articles/Premiere-Pro-CC-2017-1-2-CPU-Comparison-Skylake-X-vs-Threadripper-1012/#Conclusion
Tl;dr : Amd still give you more for the money.
Although they couldn't recommend AMD for premiere pro because the live playback performance seems to lag behind intel for about 10-5%. That's an interesting take, most review only care about rendering.