Intel's
Core i9-14900T processor was "officially" released last month alongside an expanded population of "Raptor Lake Refresh" products—the T-class alternative to Team Blue's flagship desktop Core i9-14900 CPU is a less glamorous prospect, hence almost zero press coverage and tech reviews. Its apparent lack of visibility is not helped by non-existent availability at retail, despite inclusion in Team Blue's second wave of 14th Generation Core processors (Marketing Status = Launched). The
Core i9-14900 (non-K) is readily obtainable around the globe, as a lower-power alternative to the ever greedy
Core i9-14900K, but their T-class SKU sibling takes frugality to another level. TPU's resident CPU tester, W1zzard, implemented six distinct power limit settings during a
i9-14900K supplemental experiment, with the lowest being 35 W—coincidentally, matching the
i9-14900T's default base power.
His simulated findings were not encouraging, to say the least, but late last week
BenchLeaks noticed that a lone test system had gauged the T-class part's efficiency-oriented processing prowess.
Geekbench 6.2.2 results were generated by an ASRock Z790 PG-ITX/TB4 build (with 64 GB of 5586 MT/s DDR5 SDRAM)—scoring 3019 in the overall single-core category, and 16385 in multi-core stakes. The latter score indicates a 22% performance penalty when referenced against Tom Hardware's Geekbenched i9-14900K sample.
The publication reckons that these figures place Intel's Core i9-14900T CPU in good company—notably AMD's
Ryzen 9 7900 processor, one of the company's trio of 65 W "non-X" SKUs.
Last March, W1zzard was suitably impressed by his review sample's "fantastic energy efficiency"—the Geekbench 6 official scoreboard awards it 2823 (single-core) and 16750 (multi-core) based on aggregated data from multiple submissions.