Thursday, July 10th 2025

AMD Sampling Next-Gen Ryzen Desktop "Medusa Ridge," Sees Incremental IPC Upgrade, New cIOD

AMD is reportedly sampling its next-generation Ryzen desktop processor powered by the "Zen 6" microarchitecture, codenamed "Medusa Ridge," to close industry partners, such as platform designers and OEMs, says Yuri Bubliy, aka 1usmus, author of the Hydra tuning software, and the now-retired DRAM Calculator for Ryzen. The processor sees AMD update both the CCDs and client I/O die, he says. AMD confirmed that it is building the "Zen 6" CCD on the TSMC N2 (2 nm) node, which entered risk production earlier this year. The node is expected to be ready for mass-production of 2 nm chips later this year. The 2 nm node presents a significant jump in transistor densities from the current TSMC N4P node on which AMD builds its 8-core "Zen 5" CCD, which 1usmus and other sources say, that AMD will use to increase CPU core counts per CCD.

Sources point to the possibility of AMD increasing core counts per CCD to 12, and giving the CCD 48 MB of L3 cache. At this point we don't know if all 12 cores will be arranged in a single CCX with a monolithic slab of 48 MB L3 cache, or if there's a dual-CCX layout with 6 cores per CCX sharing 24 MB of L3 cache, each. The other big upgrade with "Medusa Ridge" is its client I/O die (cIOD). AMD is expected to build its new generation cIOD on a newer EUV node such as 5 nm N5 or 4 nm N4P, a significant upgrade from the current 6 nm N6. 1usmus says that the biggest reason for AMD to update its cIOD is the memory controller architecture. AMD is expected to give "Medusa Point" a new dual memory controller architecture. There are still two DDR5 channels per socket, but this is redesigned for increased memory speeds, letting AMD catch up with Intel in this area. As for the CPU frequency boosting technologies, such as PBO and Curve Optimizer, there are no updates expected, and 1usmus concludes that it Hydra support should be straightforward.
Source: Wccftech
Add your own comment

97 Comments on AMD Sampling Next-Gen Ryzen Desktop "Medusa Ridge," Sees Incremental IPC Upgrade, New cIOD

#1
ZoneDymo
Looking forward to it, would be nice if the consumers get a bump in core count again, we have had 16 core 32 thread parts since Ryzen 3000.
Posted on Reply
#2
john_
new dual memory controller architecture
I wish one controller being DDR5 and the other GDDR6. That could be useful for APUs. AMD needs to create something new, like for example add a memory slot on motherboards, something that looks like a sodimm slot for example, that can take custom GDDR6 memory modules. That could offer all the bandwidth those iGPUs need to shine while living the bandwidth from DDR5 dimms all to the CPU.
Posted on Reply
#3
Rabit
Zen 6 points that interest me Ryzen 5 at 8 cores, +50% L3 = 48mb , 10x more connections between CCD and CCX, Ram latency on pair with monolith design + faster ram support, all this will lead to very noticeable gaming performance improvement.
Bonus X3D get 96mb +48mb for 144mb total L3 this is 50% more than 9800X3D
Posted on Reply
#4
dyonoctis
john_I wish one controller being DDR5 and the other GDDR6. That could be useful for APUs. AMD needs to create something new, like for example add a memory slot on motherboards, something that looks like a sodimm slot for example, that can take custom GDDR6 memory modules. That could offer all the bandwidth those iGPUs need to shine while living the bandwidth from DDR5 dimms all to the CPU.
From my understanding, the type of chip isn't really the issue, but rather the interface. High bandwidth need more traces, and high quality traces at that. Motherboards traces were part of the limitations preventing four dimms of DDR5 from running at XMP/EXPO speed.
Posted on Reply
#5
holyprof
ZoneDymoLooking forward to it, would be nice if the consumers get a bump in core count again, we have had 16 core 32 thread parts since Ryzen 3000.
I was getting enthusiastic too, but I'm not sure AMD is willing to give regular desktop users more than 32 threads and erode their Threadripper family.
I hope for the 12-core single CCX CPU though, to replace my aging 8 core 3700X.
Posted on Reply
#6
Rabit
dyonoctisFrom my understanding, the type of chip isn't really the issue, but rather the interface. High bandwidth need more traces, and high quality traces at that. Motherboards traces were part of the limitations preventing four dimms of DDR5 from running at XMP/EXPO speed.
Quad channel will required at-least 40% more pads and bigger CPU socket, traces issue can be solved by placing 2 CAMM like slot on back side of PCB where CPU socket is placed, to have shortest route from CPU.
Posted on Reply
#7
Hecate91
I'm looking forward to a single 12 core CCD, also would be interesting if AMD can double the Infinity Fabric speed with dual memory controllers.
Posted on Reply
#8
Nhonho
ZoneDymoLooking forward to it, would be nice if the consumers get a bump in core count again, we have had 16 core 32 thread parts since Ryzen 3000.
I prefer an 8-core CPU with higher IPC per core. And with no E-cores.

Desktop apps need CPUs with high IPC per core, not CPUs with dozens of weak cores.
Posted on Reply
#9
TheinsanegamerN
NhonhoI prefer an 8-core CPU with higher IPC per core. And with no E-cores.

Desktop apps need CPUs with high IPC per core, not CPUs with dozens of weak cores.
Why limit yourself? Mobile Ryzen has 12 core CCDs.

Also, please learn what an E core is, and what a ryzen C core is. These are not the same thing.
RabitQuad channel will required at-least 40% more pads and bigger CPU socket, traces issue can be solved by placing 2 CAMM like slot on back side of PCB where CPU socket is placed, to have shortest route from CPU.
CAMM2 modules are having the same signal integrity issues that DIMM modules have trying to push past 6000 mhz.
john_I wish one controller being DDR5 and the other GDDR6. That could be useful for APUs. AMD needs to create something new, like for example add a memory slot on motherboards, something that looks like a sodimm slot for example, that can take custom GDDR6 memory modules. That could offer all the bandwidth those iGPUs need to shine while living the bandwidth from DDR5 dimms all to the CPU.
It'd be a lot easier to simply put a x3d cache on their APUs instead of another memory controller. Not to mention that a triple bus system is going to be significantly more expensive for the end consumer than a dual pus system like we have now.
Posted on Reply
#10
Visible Noise
Has AMD ever announced tape out of Zen6? Otherwise this is typical WCCF garbage.
Posted on Reply
#11
Launcestonian
RabitQuad channel will required at-least 40% more pads and bigger CPU socket, traces issue can be solved by placing 2 CAMM like slot on back side of PCB where CPU socket is placed, to have shortest route from CPU.
Yes, but that raises the issue is there new motherboards for Zen 6 with the extra memory bandwidth capability of that architecture? As it is now, I'm sure you know B850 & X870 boards do not have CAMM slots on back side of the motherboard with current designs on the market.
Posted on Reply
#12
rusTORK
AMD is expected to give "Medusa Point" a new dual memory controller architecture. There are still two DDR5 channels per socket, but this is redesigned for increased memory speeds, letting AMD catch up with Intel in this area.

What dual memory controller architecture mean? Support two diffirent memory types? Which? I remember that AMD said that current 9800X3D don't supprt CKD memory and it can't be added without redisign.
Posted on Reply
#13
Nhonho
TheinsanegamerNWhy limit yourself? Mobile Ryzen has 12 core CCDs.

Also, please learn what an E core is, and what a ryzen C core is. These are not the same thing.
Here we go again...

Tell us what desktop applications need dozens of cores other than video encoding by the CPU?
Posted on Reply
#15
Oberon
The big difference won't be just in the memory controller but also the interconnect between the IOD and CCDs. We're going to get the same style interconnect as Strix Halo but clocked MUCH faster.
Posted on Reply
#16
Punkenjoy
rusTORKAMD is expected to give "Medusa Point" a new dual memory controller architecture. There are still two DDR5 channels per socket, but this is redesigned for increased memory speeds, letting AMD catch up with Intel in this area.

What dual memory controller architecture mean? Support two diffirent memory types? Which? I remember that AMD said that current 9800X3D don't supprt CKD memory and it can't be added without redisign.
What it mean in this context is probably instead of having 1 memory controller driving 2 channel (4 in reality since DDR5 use 2x32 bit channel per dimm), you will have 2 different memory controller with their own queues driving a single channel (1 DIMM or 2x32 bit DDR5 per DIMM)

As per the explanation, i suspect this will allow each memory controller to be smaller so the signal will have less area/distance to propagate, allowing higher frequency. This could also help with signal integrity.

The goal would be to support higher DDR5 clock allowing more bandwidth.
Posted on Reply
#17
Chaitanya
CUDIMM support and upgraded memory controller for stable opertation at speeds higher than 5200 with all 4 slots filled.
Posted on Reply
#18
R-T-B
NhonhoTell us what desktop applications need dozens of cores other than video encoding by the CPU?
I can name a few, but none you'd run, I'd wager.
Posted on Reply
#19
kondamin
No rdna 3.5 igpu upgrade on that iod nor an npu?
I have a hard time believing this will be all there is to zen 6
Posted on Reply
#20
freeagent
I wonder if they chose that name because something turns to stone when the benchmark completes :confused:
Posted on Reply
#21
ymdhis
Finally, they updated the IOD. This may be the AM5 chip that will be worth switching to.
Posted on Reply
#22
RootinTootinPootin
Hecate91dual memory controllers.
latency hit, depending on the design, and for once AMD, make 8000MT's speed not feel like worse using 6000MT's..lol..
Posted on Reply
#24
JustBenching
Cores are back on the menu boys.

Finally Intel AMD is increasing core counts.
NhonhoHere we go again...

Tell us what desktop applications need dozens of cores other than video encoding by the CPU?
A lot but it doesn't matter, dozens of cores on the desktop mean that the half a dozen core CPU would be cheaper (although this is amd we are talking about, they might as well keep charging you 400$ for 8 cores).
Posted on Reply
#25
john_
holyprofI was getting enthusiastic too, but I'm not sure AMD is willing to give regular desktop users more than 32 threads and erode their Threadripper family.
I hope for the 12-core single CCX CPU though, to replace my aging 8 core 3700X.
They will go 24 cores / 48 threads. They probably will not go the road Intel took with all those E cores, I doubt they want to make their design more complicated than what it is now and have to build something like Intel's Thread Director and have to put more software headaches on their heads to make sure that OS uses the correct cores for the correct tasks etc. What they have to do, they can't avoid it, no matter if this threatens their "low" core Threadripper models - it probably wouldn't anyway, TRs offer more than just more cores - is to at least match thread count to Intel's core count. So If Intel is going to push CPUs with 52 cores (16+32+4), then AMD will push 24 cores / 48 threads models to counter that.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 18th, 2025 06:56 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts