Sunday, February 4th 2018

Sapphire Launches Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Sapphire over the weekend officially launched its cost-effective custom-design Radeon RX Vega 56 graphics card, the Pulse Radeon Vega 56 (model: 11276-02), which began appearing on European e-tailers late-January. The card combines a custom-design short-length PCB that's roughly the length of AMD's reference R9 Fury board; with a beefy custom-design cooling solution that features two large aluminium fin-stacks, ventilated by a pair of 100 mm double ball-bearing fans.

The card offers out of the box clock speeds of 1208 MHz core, 1512 MHz boost, and 800 MHz (1.60 GHz HBM2 effective) memory, against AMD reference clock speeds of 1138 MHz core and 1474 MHz boost. At its given clock, the memory bandwidth on offer is 409.6 GB/s. The "Vega 10" silicon is configured with 3,584 stream processors, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The card draws power from a pair of 8-pin PCIe power connectors, display outputs include three DisplayPort 1.4 and one HDMI 2.0. Sapphire intended for this SKU to ideally occupy a close-to-reference price-point, a notch below its Nitro+ series, however in the wake of the crypto-currency wave, market-forces will decide its retail price.
Add your own comment

37 Comments on Sapphire Launches Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

#26
dj-electric
cdawallSo serious question how does selling more product, slow down an industry? Wouldn't that increase gross income/margin since they are selling at higher rates, which would entice a manufacturer to increase performance/release new products?
Might as well grind all this product in a huge grinder, since it doesn't increase target audience amount. If anything, it prevents new ones from joining.

About increasing performance, its not like a third company will rise in the gaming market and present huge mining numbers. all NVIDIA\AMD have to do is come up with cards that mine 5% faster than previous gen and they will be bought out. At least that's what going on right now. What kind of an incentive to grow you have if your target audience can't even reach your product. Will you, as NVIDIA, launch a new line up of volta cards right now? Hell no, it can keep rotting on its shelf like it has been for the last year or so.

Preventing the launch of a new product line is the dictionary definition of a slow down for me.
Posted on Reply
#27
sumludus
RejZoRHow often would you visit a forum that gets staff news posts and then... zero comments of any kind?
You can find out for yourself at the link below

www.nextpowerup.com/
Posted on Reply
#28
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
dj-electricMight as well grind all this product in a huge grinder, since it doesn't increase target audience amount. If anything, it prevents new ones from joining.

About increasing performance, its not like a third company will rise in the gaming market and present huge mining numbers. all NVIDIA\AMD have to do is come up with cards that mine 5% faster than previous gen and they will be bought out. At least that's what going on right now. What kind of an incentive to grow you have if your target audience can't even reach your product. Will you, as NVIDIA, launch a new line up of volta cards right now? Hell no, it can keep rotting on its shelf like it has been for the last year or so.

Preventing the launch of a new product line is the dictionary definition of a slow down for me.
Nvidia already released Volta consumer level cards. The Titan V already hit. They are on schedule from what I can tell to release the next batch of cards for 2H 2018. I have seen a product release speed up from them.

Market demanded mining cards. Both sides dropped mining cards (P106-90, P106-100, P104-100, AMD RX470/480/750/580 mining editions).

AMD if anyone is the only company taking their sweet ass time to do anything and if anything has slowed down nvidia for a release schedule it was a complete and utter lack of competition. I mean come on AMD Vega isn't even that good at mining anything other than cryptonight and it is worse at games.
Posted on Reply
#29
Fluffmeister
kastriot399$?
A decent price for gamers, but realistically for them it's not worth a penny more.

Their market share is down to a piddly 8.16% on the latest Steam hardware survey and nothing is going to change soon in the short term.

AMD need a killer product for gamers, not the Vega launch which was a train crash in slow motion.
Posted on Reply
#30
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
FluffmeisterA decent price for gamers, but realisticly for them it's not worth a penny more.

Their market share is down to a piddly 8.16% on the latest Steam hardware survey and nothing is going to change soon in the short term.

AMD need a killer product for gamers, not the Vega launch which was a train crash in slow motion.
I mean it was so late it almost missed the train crash
Posted on Reply
#31
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
FluffmeisterAMD need a killer product for gamers, not the Vega launch which was a train crash in slow motion
I think what they actually need is a great-performing mid-range card that not only kills Nvidia in 1080p but also competes pretty well at 1440p. It needs to be affordable and simple, instead of being over-engineered.

They had the right idea with the 480, but between the botched launch, lack of anything in stock initially, and voltage overdraw problems, it really didn't have a prayer. They tried to do it right with the 580, but too late.

Pity, had the 480 been done right from the beginning, their Steam percentage might be 25-30% now.
Posted on Reply
#32
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
I legit loved my original 480's minus them being hot and power hungry.
Posted on Reply
#33
Gibbo
Where in the Nano?

Give us an ITX version, looks like the PCB is already small enough.

Just bolt a shorter cooler on and take my money :-)
Posted on Reply
#34
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
cdawallI legit loved my original 480's minus them being hot and power hungry.
Oh don't get me wrong. I like the 480. My Sapphire runs cool, but still draws as much power as my 980Ti , I think. I just felt they botched what really should have been a game-changer for them.
Posted on Reply
#35
Valantar
GibboWhere in the Nano?

Give us an ITX version, looks like the PCB is already small enough.

Just bolt a shorter cooler on and take my money :)
It would be really interesting to see how low they would need to clock it to cool it with an ~R9 Nano sized cooler. I'm thinking it would probably not be egregiously low, which would make that a very interesting card indeed. The PCB looks roughly Fury X sized, so longer than ITX, but only by an inch or so. That would fit in pretty much any case.

And again: make a full cover water block for this please.
Posted on Reply
#36
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
rtwjunkieOh don't get me wrong. I like the 480. My Sapphire runs cool, but still draws as much power as my 980Ti , I think. I just felt they botched what really should have been a game-changer for them.
Those are what I had. Wish I would have kept them. Those are monster cards for mining :roll:
Posted on Reply
#37
Casecutter
kastriot399$?
If it was gamers would at least have a (dare say excellent) choice!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 00:30 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts