Friday, January 26th 2007
Apple files new patent - optical drive at the bottom of a Macbook
So everyone has been looking forward to a small MacBook Pro, but those who has ever seen the size of the 15 inch MacBook Pro mainboard, knows how small it is. Most of the space is taken up by the slot loading optical drive and battery. So what to do? Just place the optical drive on the bottom of the notebook and add a sensor which knows when you are turning the device upside down. This may sound very stupid, but it might not be as crazy as you think. If anyone can pull this off, it is Apple. I am sure all future Mac(sub)Book Pro owners will agree.
Source:
Unwired View
9 Comments on Apple files new patent - optical drive at the bottom of a Macbook
fooking brilliant!
(c) LEMONADESODA 25/01/07
Stop driving the CD from the centre spindle. Rather, rest the CD in a slot in the upright laptop screen. Inside the slot are some spools, one or more of which is rubber and powered, that the CD rests on. They make the CD turn. This way, the spindle hole can be OUTSIDE the case. Footprint saved 60%.
I doubt you could get 52x read speeds, since rotation speed would be lower. So why not have TWO or more lasers, to read multiple tracks at a time (and cache those reads). Access would be slower, but read speed would still be very high.
The reason that historically we have only one laser is due to original cost of laser. These are now DIRTY CHEAP... hence we can have multiple "heads" per drive.
Fooking brilliant!
(C) LEMONADESODA 26/01/07.
Hrmmm.
Yet another Apple "Take it up the arse" solution. I forsee alot of people lining up for this one.
(this thread will be closed any moment now...)
While theres certainly big drawbacks to this.. the whole upside down thing and all..
It may have application... elsewhere.
but those reccomending multiple lasers, CDRW lasers are next to nothing.
But the macbook pro uses a DUAL LAYER dvd burning laser... and those are not so dirt cheap for the size of what laptops use :banghead:
The initial mbp has no dual layer, simply because they couldn't make a reliable enough laser small enough to meet production standards and costs...