Thursday, June 18th 2020

AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with HBM2 Benchmarked

Benchmarks of the new Apple-exclusive AMD Radeon Pro 5600M graphics solution by Max Tech reveals that the new GPU is about 50% faster than the Radeon Pro 5500M, and within striking distance of the Radeon Pro Vega 48 found in Apple's 5K iMacs. The Pro 5600M is an Apple-exclusive solution by AMD, based on the "Navi 12" silicon that features a 7 nm GPU die based on the RDNA graphics architecture, flanked by two 4 GB HBM2 memory stacks over a 2048-bit interface. The GPU die features 2,560 stream processors, but clocked differently from Radeon Pro discrete graphics cards based on the "Navi 10" ASIC that uses conventional GDDR6.

The Radeon Pro 5600M solution was found to be 50.1 percent faster than the Radeon Pro 5500M in Geekbench 5 Metal (another Apple-exclusive SKU found in 16-inch MacBook Pros), and just 12.9 percent behind the Radeon Vega 48. The Vega 56 found in iMac Pro is still ahead. Unigine Heaven sees the Pro 5600M being 48.1% faster than the Pro 5500M, and interestingly, faster than Vega 48 by 11.3%. With 2,560 RDNA stream processors, you'd expect more performance, but this card was designed to meet stringent power limits of 50 W, and has significantly lower clock-speeds than "Navi 10" based Radeon Pro graphics cards (1035 MHz max boost engine clock vs. 1930 MHz and 205 W TDP of the Pro W5700). Find more interesting commentary in the Max Tech video presentation.
Source: VideoCardz
Add your own comment

52 Comments on AMD Radeon Pro 5600M with HBM2 Benchmarked

#51
mtcn77
ValantarAs usual, your posts are needlessly technical gibberish that generally don't relate to the topic. "point scale"? "textural quality"? "sampling distribution"? I'm talking about being able to compare two things with the same metric. For gaming performance, that generally means the same game, at the same resolution, at the same settings, with the same driver and as few background applications as possible. What you are talking about has no relevance to this whatsoever.
The game designers cannot introduce repeating patterns just some random npc found necessary, alright?
Posted on Reply
#52
Adam Krazispeed
cucker tarlsonone would think the editor should mention that
actually They did HERE:

"With 2,560 RDNA stream processors, you'd expect more performance, ****but this card was designed to meet stringent power limits of 50 W, **** and has significantly lower clock-speeds than "Navi 10" based Radeon Pro graphics cards (1035 MHz max boost engine clock vs. 1930 MHz and 205 W TDP of the Pro W5700). Find more interesting commentary in the Max Tech video presentation."
dj-electricThat RX 5600M config is what i wish i had in a NUC-sized computer, for real.
oh yea, Me TOO!!!! ") Just not an apple devce :P
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jan 10th, 2025 00:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts