Tuesday, September 22nd 2020

Samsung Delivers Next-Level SSD Performance with 980 PRO

Samsung Electronics, the world leader in advanced memory technology, today unveiled the company's first consumer PCIe 4.0 NVMe solid state drive (SSD) - the Samsung SSD 980 PRO. The new 980 PRO is designed for professionals and consumers who want cutting-edge performance in their high-end PCs, workstations and game consoles.

"Over the years, Samsung has continuously challenged the limits of high-speed flash memory storage solutions," said Dr. Mike Mang, vice president of Memory Brand Product Biz at Samsung Electronics. "The new 980 PRO SSD reflects our continuing commitment to delivering exceptional products consumers have come to expect from Samsung."
Optimized for handling data-intensive applications, the 980 PRO is ideal for consumers and professionals who work with 4K and 8K contents, and play graphics-heavy games. All the key components, including the custom Elpis controller, V-NAND and DRAM, are completely designed in-house to deliver the full potential of PCIe 4.0. This allows the 980 PRO to provide sequential read and write speeds of up to 7,000 MB/s and 5,000 MB/s respectively, as well as random read and write speeds of up to 1,000K IOPS, making it up to two times faster than PCIe 3.0 SSDs and up to 12.7 times faster than SATA SSDs.

In addition to enhanced performance, the 980 PRO comes with outstanding thermal control solutions for improved reliability. While most of today's high-performance NVMe SSDs rely on external copper heatsinks to diffuse heat, Samsung's 980 PRO employs a nickel coating on the controller as well as a heat spreader label on the back side of the SSD for efficient thermal management. These innovative heat-dissipating functions also allow the drive to maintain its compact and slim M.2 form factor. Samsung's Dynamic Thermal Guard technology further ensures that the drive's temperature stays at the optimal level, minimizing performance fluctuations over the long haul.


The Samsung SSD 980 PRO comes in 1 TB, 500 GB and 250 GB models, and will be available worldwide starting this month, while the 2 TB capacity model will be available by the end of this year. The 980 PRO's manufacturer's suggested retail prices start at $89.99 for the 250 GB model.
Add your own comment

60 Comments on Samsung Delivers Next-Level SSD Performance with 980 PRO

#26
R0H1T
Caring1So what are you going to call 6 bit MLC? ;)
Sexa MLC :toast:
Posted on Reply
#27
theonek
970 evo plus are with the same TBW, so the difference is only transfer rate if you have pcie 4.0....
Posted on Reply
#28
R0H1T
You're making it sound as if that's not the biggest difference that people generally look for in high end drives?
Posted on Reply
#29
nemesis.ie
SearingThe results are not impressive. You are better off buying SK Hynix's PCIe 3.0 drive. I am definitely not impressed with PCIe 4.0 drives. Being actually slower than PCIe 3.0 drives in a range of tasks is a no no. Double the price for nothing.
The Anand results? The note says the tests were done on gen 3, so they should be better on 4 and likely if you have 3 and don't plan on getting for any time soon, they are indeed not a good buy for a 3.0 board.
Posted on Reply
#30
Cheeseball
Not a Potato
Its $230 for 1TB on pre-order on Amazon.com (US) right now.
Posted on Reply
#31
bonehead123
CheeseballIts $230 for 1TB on pre-order on Amazon.com (US) right now.
So that prob means ~$440-ish for the 2TB model ?

That suks when there are many other gen4 drives that are just as fast or faster for less $$...

Hey Sammy, B.M.A...:nutkick:..:shadedshu:..:cry:..:kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#32
TheLostSwede
News Editor
nemesis.ieThe Anand results? The note says the tests were done on gen 3, so they should be better on 4 and likely if you have 3 and don't plan on getting for any time soon, they are indeed not a good buy for a 3.0 board.
I think you need to put on your glasses...
Our new PCIe 4 test system uses an AMD Ryzen 5 3600X processor and an ASRock B550 motherboard. This provides PCIe 4 lanes from the CPU but not from the chipset. Whenever possible, we test NVMe SSDs with CPU-provided PCIe lanes rather than going through the chipset, so the lack of PCIe gen4 from the chipset isn't an issue.
Posted on Reply
#33
Animalpak
MxPhenom 216No, you just won't get the full pcie 4.0 bandwidth they are advertising for the ssd. Itll work in pcie 3.0 boards.
Thanks for all the info's, yeah but then no reason to upgrade if will be slower. So im sticking with Gen 3.0 unitil Intel... Again will release whole new Motherboards and CPU's.
Posted on Reply
#35
HugsNotDrugs
AssimilatorWaiting for all the children to cry about how TLC is teh worst...
TLC is good enough but in this case you're paying Ferrari prices for a BMW product. People are allowed to want MLC for such a huge price premium.
Posted on Reply
#37
Bubster
iF you use gen4 M2 with Pci-e gen 4 you get the full or near speed promised (but the temps play a role and sometimes when they get too hot they throttle down like in the kingston A M2 nvme and speed nearly halves).
if you use gen 4 M2 with Pci-e gen 3 you get 3500 mbs read and about 3000 write which is still fast. one has to remember about the M2 cooling and one have to have a good chunk of fast RAM at least 32 gb.
Posted on Reply
#38
chrcoluk
nemesis.ieThanks for posting, there is this odd note "Note2: We are currently in the process of testing these benchmarks in PCIe 4.0 mode. Results will be added as they finish. "

Not sure why they would post a review of a PCIe4 drive not using it.
because many people will buy this to use on their pcie3 boards.
Posted on Reply
#39
Octopuss
So what is the real speed of the NAND? All these higher and higher advertised speeds are just the DRAM/SLC buffers, right?
Posted on Reply
#41
ironwolf
Newegg Pre-Order pricing:
Release Date: 10/12/2020

250 GB: $89.99
500 GB: $149.99
1 TB: $229.99
Posted on Reply
#42
voltage
certainly much faster than the previous 970 pro, but, will not last as long as the 970 pro.
Posted on Reply
#43
R0H1T
HugsNotDrugsTLC is good enough but in this case you're paying Ferrari prices for a BMW product
You mean more like a Ferrari with no name off brand tires. These aren't strictly "Ferraris" nor are they marketed as such, unless you think every "premium" car is a Ferrari & everyone of them does the (exact) same thing?
Posted on Reply
#45
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
TomgangI am hornestly a bit disappointed. I expected more from Samsung latest m.2 nvme SSD. Well I might have to reconsider another SSD for my zen 3/ampere system i am planning.
Same here. I wanted this to be an MLC (2-bits per cell) drive.
Posted on Reply
#46
ExcuseMeWtf
R0H1TYou mean more like a Ferrari with no name off brand tires. These aren't strictly "Ferraris" nor are they marketed as such, unless you think every "premium" car is a Ferrari & everyone of them does the (exact) same thing?
You can change tires in your car though. Can customers plausibly change NAND chips in drives they buy? :wtf:
Posted on Reply
#47
silentbogo
TheLostSwedeHow so? MLC stands for Multi-level Cell, it can be six bits per cell in reality.
Yes, three bits per cell is normally called TLC, but MLC could be used for anything with more than one bit per cell.
It boils down to manufacturer-induced conventions, where for the past umphty years MLC was used in context of 2-bits per cell (and yes, TLC can also be configured as 1/2-bit). Samsung is simply playing on technicalities now, which is not fair to consumers. I'm actually surprised they didn't cut the warranty to 3 years along with halving rated TBW. Would've been another QVO fiasco.
TheLostSwedeAnd another review, that still shows it being not that impressive, especially for the asking price.
Just looked through Guru3D review, and it's pretty much the same thing - unstable performance unless we're talking sub-100G sequential transfers. May be good for video editing, but for a typical consumer I doubt it'll make much difference even comparing to runn-of-the-mill PCIe 3.0 TLC SSD.
Posted on Reply
#48
Octopuss
I am certainly happy with my 1TB 970 Pro. I'll want another - smaller - NVMe drive for Windows when I upgrade my PC though, and I'm not sure what to look for. I certainly don't want to keep the SATA 850 Pro around with all the cables annoying me. The 250GB variant seems to be painfully slow. I might just go backwards and buy what, 970 EVO plus or whatever the model is?
Posted on Reply
#49
TheLostSwede
News Editor
silentbogoIt boils down to manufacturer-induced conventions, where for the past umphty years MLC was used in context of 2-bits per cell (and yes, TLC can also be configured as 1/2-bit). Samsung is simply playing on technicalities now, which is not fair to consumers. I'm actually surprised they didn't cut the warranty to 3 years along with halving rated TBW. Would've been another QVO fiasco.
Yes, sure, but it still doesn't make it wrong. Dodgy, sure, but MLC can be used for any number of bits per cell, as long as it says how many bits there are per cell.

As for the TBW see:
www.storagereview.com/review/samsung-980-pro-pcie-4-0-nvme-ssd-review

I guess Samsung has worked out the warranty based on how much their average user writes to their drives.
silentbogoJust looked through Guru3D review, and it's pretty much the same thing - unstable performance unless we're talking sub-100G sequential transfers. May be good for video editing, but for a typical consumer I doubt it'll make much difference even comparing to runn-of-the-mill PCIe 3.0 TLC SSD.
For 99.9% of people it's going to make zero difference. It seems like the 4K reads are up slightly compared to most other SSDs, which is nice, but not nice enough to spend that much money on an SSD.
Posted on Reply
#50
Tomgang
btarunrSame here. I wanted this to be an MLC (2-bits per cell) drive.
Yeah. To me 980 PRO doesn't live up to its hype/reputation + the choice of using MLC chips. This is a step in the wrong direction for sure. It's a shame cause Samsung together with crucial has always been my choice to go to. Samsung for being fast and reliable and crucial for being cheaper but still reliable. I have had properly like 10 Samsung and crucial SSD over the last 9 years and none of them had ever failed me while 3 HDD had failed. Well one litterly fail and two getting bad sectors warning. The rest that goes wrong is because of old age or simply warrant out.

So for Samsung going this direction, is a poor choise. Cause there pro nvme SSD has else to this point been some of the best.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 30th, 2024 23:12 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts