Wednesday, February 9th 2022

Internal Turmoil at Samsung Might Lead to Delay of QD-OLED Products in Retail

Samsung Electronics appears to have ended up in a pricing dispute with Samsung Display over the cost of QD-OLED panels, which could have the knock-on effect that Samsung branded QD-OLED displays might end up in retail later than anticipated. Samsung Electronics was set to launch its first QD-OLED TVs towards the middle of this year, but it seems like that might no longer be the case, unless the dispute can be resolved. The reason behind it, seems to be that LG Display's W-OLED panels are cheaper than Samsung Display's QD-OLED panels and Samsung Electronics doesn't want to pay a higher panel price.

It's unknown how much of a price difference there is, but The Elec is guessing it's around US$100 per panel. Considering Samsung Electronics appears to have bet heavily on QD-OLED, at least based on their CES 2022 announcements and that we're talking about premium TV's here, it doesn't seem like it would make that big of a difference. However, without knowing how competitive Samsung intended to be, it's possible that they wouldn't be able to compete with companies using W-OLED panels from LG Display. Maybe the most interesting part of this story is the fact that it mentions that Samsung Display is working on a 30-inch QD-OLED panel that they will supply Dell with, which is targeted towards computer monitors. So even if we might not see QD-OLED TV's when initially expected, we can at least hope for some high-end computer monitors with the tech later this year. Samsung Display is said to be producing QD-OLED substrates at a size of 2.2 x 2.5 metres at a rate of 30,000 units per month at the moment.
Source: The Elec
Add your own comment

25 Comments on Internal Turmoil at Samsung Might Lead to Delay of QD-OLED Products in Retail

#1
Crackong
Samsung is considering using cheaper LG panels instead of Samsung's own panels directly from their own factory ?
Posted on Reply
#2
bug
Called it from day 1: if it's a more complicated piece on paper, it will be more expensive to make. As simple as that.

Fwiw, I also called higher power draw, but apparently we won't be able to probe that this year.
Posted on Reply
#3
R0H1T
CrackongSamsung is considering using cheaper LG panels instead of Samsung's own panels directly from their own factory ?
Well Samsung display also sells their panels to Apple, Xiaomi, OnePlus et al directly competing with Samsung phones ~ so there's that.
Posted on Reply
#4
Chomiq
CrackongSamsung is considering using cheaper LG panels instead of Samsung's own panels directly from their own factory ?
It's not "their own" factory. Samsung Display =/= Samsung Electronics. It's the same thing with LG. Both are independent divisions. That's why the first consumer QD-OLED TV will come from Sony instead of Samsung, Sony knows that they can eat the cost of the new panel because they will pass it on to consumer. Samsung Electronics wants to have a competitive product to LG's OLED and to that and actually make money they need the panel cost to, at least, match LG's offering.
Posted on Reply
#5
Ferrum Master
Is this what we are seeing here called incest? :roll:
Posted on Reply
#6
bug
Ferrum MasterIs this what we are seeing here called incest? :roll:
Just a plain case of jumping the gun.
Posted on Reply
#7
Vayra86
bugCalled it from day 1: if it's a more complicated piece on paper, it will be more expensive to make. As simple as that.

Fwiw, I also called higher power draw, but apparently we won't be able to probe that this year.
Soon... Samsung markets QLED as a quantum dot solution that really isn't what it is. Oh wait, this was supposed to be that step up to the real thing already :D

I always struggled to understand why LG would first win a drawn out patent war with a clear design win, only for Samsung to then reinvent the wheel but better and still at lower cost. If they could, they'd have done it to begin with.

In the meantime they tried micro leds which so far is going absolutely nowhere other than a buggy 'The Frame' that nobody wants on the wall, and a bunch of misleading QLED nonsense.

At least they're trying, but every time Samsung also hits the front page with some shady business to make it all happen. I'm staying away from this company now, because this 'losing battle' echoes in their product quality. The QLED TV I have is an absolute POS going from display quality to the menu to its smart functionality to simple functions on the remote that are buggy as hell (turn it off, it turns itself on again randomly), and that seems to be a trend with anything coming from Samsung Display. Quality happens only in the marketing ads, the final product is often lacking or just breaks shortly after warranty. And also... the plastic. Its everywhere and its not sturdy either.

The trend echoes in AMOLED, too, with its horribly short lifespan.
Posted on Reply
#8
Chomiq
Ferrum MasterIs this what we are seeing here called incest? :roll:
More like siblings fighting
Vayra86The QLED TV I have is an absolute POS going from display quality to the menu to its smart functionality to simple functions on the remote that are buggy as hell (turn it off, it turns itself on again randomly), and that seems to be a trend with anything coming from Samsung Display.
Once again, it's Samsung Electronics that makes the end product, i.e. TV.
Posted on Reply
#9
bug
Vayra86Soon... Samsung markets QLED as a quantum dot solution that really isn't what it is. Oh wait, this was supposed to be that step up to the real thing already :D

I always struggled to understand why LG would first win a drawn out patent war with a clear design win, only for Samsung to then reinvent the wheel but better and still at lower cost. If they could, they'd have done it to begin with.

In the meantime they tried micro leds which so far is going absolutely nowhere other than a buggy 'The Frame' that nobody wants on the wall, and a bunch of misleading QLED nonsense.

At least they're trying, but every time Samsung also hits the front page with some shady business to make it all happen. I'm staying away from this company now, because this 'losing battle' echoes in their product quality. The QLED TV I have is an absolute POS going from display quality to the menu to its smart functionality to simple functions on the remote that are buggy as hell (turn it off, it turns itself on again randomly), and that seems to be a trend with anything coming from Samsung Display. Quality happens only in the marketing ads, the final product is often lacking or just breaks shortly after warranty. And also... the plastic. Its everywhere and its not sturdy either.

The trend echoes in AMOLED, too, with its horribly short lifespan.
Agreed, but I want to correct your blaming of Samsung Display for the quality of QLED TVs. Performance of a panel is mostly dictated by the control electronics, so the culprit here is probably Samsung Electronics.
I don't think Samsung sells QLED panels to 3rd parties, but looking at LG, there are instances when the same panel makes a better monitor in the hands of other manufacturers (e.g. Dell). Like I said, it's more about the execution that it is about the panel.

Edit: ninja'd
Posted on Reply
#10
trsttte
I know they're different entities but this still sounds stupid as fuck. Dell and Sony will be the first to debut products with QD-OLED and as such get a fair part of the publicity from a Samsung-mega-corp development but hey, who cares about brand recognition am I right?

At least they're also kicking production of ~30 inch panels so we might see some regular size high quality monitors soon, since everyone else is dragging their feets pushing the same old crappy tech (some form or another of ips/va with sub par contrast with barely any local dimming, but hey at least they're pushing beyond 300hz, because that's the most important...)
Posted on Reply
#11
bug
trsttteI know they're different entities but this still sounds stupid as fuck. Dell and Sony will be the first to debut products with QD-OLED and as such get a fair part of the publicity from a Samsung-mega-corp development but hey, who cares about brand recognition am I right?
It seems like you fail to realize how conglomerates work. LGSamsung Display couldn't care less who brings the first QD-LED TVs to the market. They care about making QD-LED panels. And selling them for profit.
And this works the other way, too: failing to sell their products for profit, LG had no problem shutting down their mobile division. No holes in the sky have been reported because if that.

Mostly unrelated, but this is why Google reorganized their various divisions under the Alphabet umbrella: everyone else was piggybacking on Google's (the search engine) success. And they wanted division to stand on their own.

Edit: Corrected, thanks @TheLostSwede
Posted on Reply
#12
trsttte
bugIt seems like you fail to realize how conglomerates work. LG Display couldn't care less who brings the first QD-LED TVs to the market. They care about making QD-LED panels. And selling them for profit.
And this works the other way, too: failing to sell their products for profit, LG had no problem shutting down their mobile division. No holes in the sky have been reported because if that.

Mostly unrelated, but this is why Google reorganized their various divisions under the Alphabet umbrella: everyone else was piggybacking on Google's (the search engine) success. And they wanted division to stand on their own.
Yeah I know, I still hold some naive notion that c-suite execs care about some long term vision of being able to offer and recognized for better products which of course is not true. It makes short term business sense to let sony get the publicity and bear the higher costs but it still sounds stupid to me.
Posted on Reply
#13
TheLostSwede
News Editor
bugIt seems like you fail to realize how conglomerates work. LG Display couldn't care less who brings the first QD-LED TVs to the market. They care about making QD-LED panels. And selling them for profit.
And this works the other way, too: failing to sell their products for profit, LG had no problem shutting down their mobile division. No holes in the sky have been reported because if that.

Mostly unrelated, but this is why Google reorganized their various divisions under the Alphabet umbrella: everyone else was piggybacking on Google's (the search engine) success. And they wanted division to stand on their own.
Just one little thing, LG makes W-OLED, not QD-OLED ;)
Posted on Reply
#14
Tomorrow
I believe Samsung Display currently makes 3 sizes of QD-OLED: 65" and 55" for TV's and 34" intended for UltraWide monitors. Not sure where the supposed 30" info comes from.
Also here's hoping this does not effect 3rd party designs using these panels from reaching the market in Q2. Alienware 34" monitor and Sony's A95 TV if im not mistaken.
Posted on Reply
#15
trsttte
TomorrowI believe Samsung Display currently makes 3 sizes of QD-OLED: 65" and 55" for TV's and 34" intended for UltraWide monitors. Not sure where the supposed 30" info comes from.
Also here's hoping this does not effect 3rd party designs using these panels from reaching the market in Q2. Alienware 34" monitor and Sony's A95 TV if im not mistaken.
Going by the 2.2m x 2.5m glass size they might be using a gen 8/8.5 fab which can be cut into 3x 65'' + 6x 32''

global.samsungdisplay.com/28976/
Posted on Reply
#16
konga
The most exciting part of this news story is the possibility of a 30" display using this new tech. 30" is typically a 16:10 panel. I'm guessing it'll be a 2560x1600 60hz productivity/content creation display, but what if it's a high-refresh 3840x2400 display? *drool*
Posted on Reply
#17
trsttte
kongaThe most exciting part of this news story is the possibility of a 30" display using this new tech. 30" is typically a 16:10 panel. I'm guessing it'll be a 2560x1600 60hz productivity/content creation display, but what if it's a high-refresh 3840x2400 display? *drool*
The first monitor set to launch is an Alienware ultra wide because they can dilute the higher price with the curved ultra wide and gaming! markups. I'm sure other monitors will use similar tactics, this tech is surely going to be expensive (I still believe not as bad as FALD/micro led but let's wait and see) so higher margin products are due first (4k, hdr, high refresh gaming stuff).

QD-OLED also offers the same instant response time advantages of OLED so yeah *drool*, i'm hoping for finally a monitor worth buying.
Posted on Reply
#18
Chomiq
Some details on QD-OLED tech:
Posted on Reply
#19
trsttte
I just read this rumour over at notebookcheck that the Alienware QD-OLED ultrawide will be launching next spring at 1299$! For a new ultra wide, with high refresh rate, with a new oled based tech! :eek:

www.notebookcheck.net/34-inch-Alienware-quantum-dot-OLED-monitor-will-cost-you-1299-when-it-launches-this-Spring.598739.0.html

If the 30'' monitors mentioned here pan out, by usual market rates going for something like 899$ or 999$ looks to me like a game changer!
Posted on Reply
#20
Tomorrow
trsttteI just read this rumour over at notebookcheck that the Alienware QD-OLED ultrawide will be launching next spring at 1299$! For a new ultra wide, with high refresh rate, with a new oled based tech! :eek:

www.notebookcheck.net/34-inch-Alienware-quantum-dot-OLED-monitor-will-cost-you-1299-when-it-launches-this-Spring.598739.0.html

If the 30'' monitors mentioned here pan out, by usual market rates going for something like 899$ or 999$ looks to me like a game changer!
*This* spring. But 1300 is acceptable for a monitor. Especially for OLED one. Alienware generally commands price premium over most others. I image AOC etc using this panel would cost even less.
Posted on Reply
#21
konga
Dell confirmed that price directly to the press, so it's real. That's a great price for a flagship display using a new technology. That video linked above explained how QD-OLED is theoretically easier to manufacture than W-OLED. I imagine that once Samsung refines the panel manufacturing process and scales it up, prices will go down quite a bit.
Posted on Reply
#23
Vayra86
trsttteI just read this rumour over at notebookcheck that the Alienware QD-OLED ultrawide will be launching next spring at 1299$! For a new ultra wide, with high refresh rate, with a new oled based tech! :eek:

www.notebookcheck.net/34-inch-Alienware-quantum-dot-OLED-monitor-will-cost-you-1299-when-it-launches-this-Spring.598739.0.html

If the 30'' monitors mentioned here pan out, by usual market rates going for something like 899$ or 999$ looks to me like a game changer!
GTFO
I need a solid review on this asap
Would definitely drop 1K for a durable oled monitor...
Posted on Reply
#24
trsttte
Tomorrow*This* spring
Cultural differences, both mean the same :D
Posted on Reply
#25
bug
Vayra86GTFO
I need a solid review on this asap
Would definitely drop 1K for a durable oled monitor...
Me too. But I require proper 4k and flat, so I still have some waiting to do :P
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 1st, 2024 07:55 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts