Thursday, August 11th 2022

Alphacool Unveils the CORE XP³ Brass CPU Water Block

Alphacool presents today the Core XP³ Brass CPU cooler. Due to the still high popularity of the very compact Core XP³ CPU cooler, Alphacool has decided to offer another variant. The Core XP³ Brass is, as the name suggests, made of brass. Together with the nickel-plated copper base, the waste heat from the CPU is even better distributed and more efficiently transferred to the coolant.

The high weight and perfect color coating leave no doubt about the high value of this CPU water cooler. With this full metal cooler you get a very compact CPU water block for all current mainstream sockets from AMD and Intel. It offers the typical high Alphacool quality paired with outstanding performance at a fantastic price.
For more information and to purchase, visit this page. MSRP: 44.98€ including taxes.
Add your own comment

38 Comments on Alphacool Unveils the CORE XP³ Brass CPU Water Block

#26
ThrashZone
EddyAlphacool@ThrashZone
I do not contradict myself. Of course, brass is harder than acetal. But acetal is still a hard material. Destroying an acetal thread requires a lot of force. In general, you should not use that much force to screw on a fitting. You will never be able to overtighten an acetal thread by hand. You will need a tool to do that and you should never do that when screwing in fittings. Otherwise you will destroy the O-ring on the fitting and the whole thing will leak.

There are also differences in the quality of acetal. Buy a cooler or AGB of acetal from us, you will not get a scratch with a fingernail pure. You just have to know how to do it. There are also differences in the quality of acetal, depending on how it is treated and processed.
Hi,
If you would of quoted me you'd see I didn't or never said anything about messing up any acetal threads.
ThrashZonePrime example
Use simple easy to get woodworking router bit
Acetal would be as easy as butter with one
Brass it would be destroyed as soon as it hits it.
This is the only reference to some thing being destroyed
Posted on Reply
#27
EddyAlphacool
Alphacool Rep
@ThrashZone
It was not my intention to insinuate anything. I'm sorry if that came across wrong. Only when I explain something, then so that others also understand it or I try to explain it as well as possible for all, so that it is clear and understandable for all.
Posted on Reply
#28
RH92
@EddyAlphacool

While you are here i would like to ask you if the DC-LT 2600 pump will have enough pressure to run a CPU + GPU + two 240mm rads ( all fairly low impedance ) with very short tube lenght between the components ( certainly less than a 1m total lenght ) ?
Posted on Reply
#29
EddyAlphacool
Alphacool Rep
@RH92
I would not recommend it. It will work, but not very well or the flow will be extremely low. Depending on the overall design, it may not work at all. The pump is a bit weak for that.
Posted on Reply
#30
RH92
EddyAlphacool@RH92
I would not recommend it. It will work, but not very well or the flow will be extremely low. Depending on the overall design, it may not work at all. The pump is a bit weak for that.
Got you , i guess i will give it a go with a single one and add a second one in the loop if need be .
Posted on Reply
#31
MarsM4N
Kinda sad it's all powder coated. :( Would look way more unique if the separated edges would expose some brushed brass.
EddyAlphacoolHonestly.... Brass doesn't really do anything better than acetal. It's better in feel, the weight makes it feel better, and some believe that a brass top makes for better heat distribution and therefore better heat absorption. But the latter is actually wrong. According to our measurements, brass tops do not provide any temperature advantages. Many still want a brass version because it simply feels better and is not "plastic". If you don't care, you can simply take the acetal version. There are definitely no disadvantages. (Unless you want to believe in it compulsively :D :cool: )
Some tests would be interesting. Acetal vs. Brass, turn off the pump & clock what system shuts down first. Bet the brass version wins. :D
Posted on Reply
#32
ThrashZone
MarsM4NKinda sad it's all powder coated. :( Would look way more unique if the separated edges would expose some brushed brass.



Some tests would be interesting. Acetal vs. Brass, turn off the pump & clock what system shuts down first. Bet the brass version wins. :D
Hi,
Yeah I did test my optimus sigV2 brass against my optimus foundation acrylic
The difference was clear at maximum clocks the sigV2 was 2c better and I love the foundation to but day to day gaming/... nonsense yeah doubt anyone would notice but this techpowerup not default clocks com so turn on the heater baby benchmark the shit out of the system and brass will win every time on the same setup and clocks.
This testing was with my x299 system 28 threads so lots of heat from 9940x to try and keep cool at 4.9.
Posted on Reply
#33
EddyAlphacool
Alphacool Rep
BlaylockWith AM5 launching next month I'm curious why there's no support for it.
To put it on the record here. All current coolers and AIOs from us that are currently compatible with AM4 are also fully compatible with AM5.
You don't need a new socket mount or other parts. So you can easily move your coolers and AIOs from AM4 to AM5 with the mounting bracket you already have.

The whole thing we will also communicate via PR next week again to the outside.
Posted on Reply
#34
Crackong
EddyAlphacool@Crackong
Yes, you can choose any orrentation you want, also with all our XPX (non Pro) cooler on every compatible socket.
May I ask, if I just want cooling performance on AM4, which block should I pick from the Alphacool selection?
Posted on Reply
#35
EddyAlphacool
Alphacool Rep
@Crackong
Any XPX cooler would be the best. Doesn`t matter which of them. The differences are ~1k between all of them.
Posted on Reply
#36
Blaylock
EddyAlphacool@Crackong
Any XPX cooler would be the best. Doesn`t matter which of them. The differences are ~1k between all of them.
The difference between 1K is actually quite extreme. LMAO I'm sure you meant ~1C.
Posted on Reply
#37
HenrySomeone
BlaylockThe difference between 1K is actually quite extreme. LMAO I'm sure you meant ~1C.
He could have well meant 1K (although it should be with a capital K, not k) as in 1 degree kelvin, the scientific temp scale (increments are the same as C).
Posted on Reply
#38
Blaylock
HenrySomeoneHe could have well meant 1K (although it should be with a capital K, not k) as in 1 degree kelvin, the scientific temp scale (increments are the same as C).
Oh snap. I never realized they scale the same. Thanks for pointing that out Henry.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Oct 1st, 2024 09:25 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts