Sunday, October 23rd 2022

Internet Data Transmission Record Shattered by Danish Researchers

Transmitting data over the internet is something that just happens for most of us, but the infrastructure that's powering the internet is full of bottlenecks and researchers around the world are testing new ways of being able to transmit more data using already installed fibre. A team of researchers from the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) has managed to break the data transmission record by quite some margin, using something called a frequency comb, which is a photonics chip. The team of researchers hit a data transmission speed of an insane 1.84 Petabits per second over a distance of 7.9 kilometres—or 4.9 miles if you like—using standard fibre optic lines.

This equates to more than the total volume of global internet traffic that's being sent every second, according to DTU. Although the distance is far from the longest, as a team of Japanese researchers have managed to transmit a 319 Terrabit per second datastream over a distance of 3,001 km (1,864 miles), although they used signal amplifiers every 70 km to reach this distance. The DTU team's frequency comb was made by Chalmers University of Technology in Sweden and it breaks down the infrared laser that's being used to transmit the data, into a rainbow spectrum, where each colour corresponds to a frequency equivalent. This allows multiple streams of data to be encoded with data, before being re-integrated and sent as a single infrared laser signal over the fibre. According to DTU, without the frequency comb, they would've needed more than a thousand lasers to achieve the same speeds using state-of-the-art commercial equipment. The team at DTU expects to be able to hit speeds of up to 100 Petabit per second in the future.
Sources: Technical University of Denmark, via The Register
Add your own comment

40 Comments on Internet Data Transmission Record Shattered by Danish Researchers

#26
zlobby
ReadlightThere will be no internet with hard disk, SSD maxsimum speed.
Cant even get USB 1-2 port speed.
Not over long distances and not very soon. But there are many 100 and even 400Gbps links in data centers. Plus, what you are talking about is instant disk mirroring over distance, good luck with that.

USB2.0 speeds can reach 480Mbps at L1 but baud rate drops to ~20MB/s in sustained transfers due to overhead. And 1Gbps link can get you 20MB/s with no sweat at all.
Prima.VeraNow what kind of router and switches technologies needs to be build in order to transmit this kind of speed over the Internets?
Insane ones! Especially if you want switching at wire speeds. Just imagine this - even latest $1000 CPU can only get around 50-60Gbps of RAM bandwidth, and only from insanely tuned (and just as expensive) RAM sticks.
And now imagine if you have to switch 100 ports of 100Gbps each! Puts things into perspective, no?
Posted on Reply
#27
SOAREVERSOR
Xex360It is weird that people living in the so called first world countries still have data caps, while people in 3rd world countries don't, then you remember there is a place called the United States :D
I'm in the US and I haven't had a data cap as long as I can remember from when I had dial up in the 90s. The options where I am now are Comcast (offers gig over fiber) and Verizon (also offers gig over fiber) neither has a data cap.

My phone has a 6gb data cap but offers unlimited plans as well. I don't need that so I'm not going to pay for it and I don't use all my data so it keeps rolling over till I have a massive pool of it.
Posted on Reply
#28
RH92
Turns out the legend was true , RGB does increase your internet connection :roll:
Posted on Reply
#29
zlobby
RH92Turns out the legend was true , RGB doe increase your internet connection :roll:
Ironically, yes.
Posted on Reply
#30
mechtech
Wow. That’s a long time for a cpu OC record!!
Posted on Reply
#31
TheLostSwede
News Editor
WirkoI just threw in some very approximate figure. My FTTH connection reaches 180/25 Mbps with the exchange (or whatever it's called) some 20 km away. Most likely it's an all passive network with no amplifiers in between, just splitters.

I'm not familiar with the latest development in copper technology, I still think that 100 Mbps over one kilometre is close to the limit, or over the limit, of any DSL. Am I wrong?
Don't forget that cable TV networks run over copper as well, so DOCSIS networks can achieve much higher speeds than xDSL.
mechtechWow. That’s a long time for a cpu OC record!!
Wrong thread?
mechtechWow. That’s a long time for a cpu OC record!!
Wrong thread?
Posted on Reply
#32
mechtech
TheLostSwedeDon't forget that cable TV networks run over copper as well, so DOCSIS networks can achieve much higher speeds than xDSL.


Wrong thread?


Wrong thread?
Yep. On a phone with 1 bar service….sigh.
Posted on Reply
#33
AusWolf
The next thing I'm wondering about is what sort of CPU power and network adapter(s) one needs to maintain such a high connection speed.
Posted on Reply
#34
CapNemo72
Well, for starters, those chips are not for us at home, they are for the telecom companies to bring us high-speed internet.
By using only one chip, they can pack more in the same space and (just maybe) make it cheaper.

I remember the times when HDDs were too slow for a 1Gbit fiber connection.

Todays SSDs NVMe are around 5000MBs (some less, some more), so you would need a 40Gbit fiber connection to hit their speed.
Folks that have 10Gbits connections are already bottlenecked by SATA SSDs or the ones that are around 1000Mbs.
Imagine your download speed is faster than your SSD. Funny times.

Of course, companies are already using speeds past 100Gbit (and several of them), especially to connect to their data centers.
Posted on Reply
#35
zlobby
AusWolfThe next thing I'm wondering about is what sort of CPU power and network adapter(s) one needs to maintain such a high connection speed.
There is a lot of HW offloading done in the NIC itself, but main thing to remember here is that this is (for the time being) a data center thing. No ISP would invest into something similar for their end-users.
Posted on Reply
#36
kapone32
zlobbyThere is a lot of HW offloading done in the NIC itself, but main thing to remember here is that this is (for the time being) a data center thing. No ISP would invest into something similar for their end-users.
I have to admit that I work for a ISP based Tel co in Canada and these would be great for Cross Province/Country Fibre for the foundation of fibre networks.
Posted on Reply
#37
zlobby
kapone32I have to admit that I work for a ISP based Tel co in Canada and these would be great for Cross Province/Country Fibre for the foundation of fibre networks.
Distances are the real issue here. 100Gbps would be a beast for backbone but given the sheer size of countries like Canada it's simply not possible as of now. Not unless major investments are done for signal regeneration.
Posted on Reply
#38
Wirko
Sources (Tom's and others) say that the data was sent over 37 fibres, not a single fibre. However, just one laser and one optical chip did all the work at the transmitting end. The optical bandwidth was, hold your breath, about 8 terahertz (infrared light between 188 and 196 THz).

No word about energy per bit transmitted but it must have been record low.
Posted on Reply
#39
Prima.Vera
ReadlightThere will be no internet with hard disk, SSD maxsimum speed.
Cant even get USB 1-2 port speed.
Not sure what you mean. Literally, I have a cheap 1Gbps/s Internet pipe right now.
zlobbyAnd now imagine if you have to switch 100 ports of 100Gbps each! Puts things into perspective, no?
This is nothing fancy. Just like Carrier type Router and Switches, they are using a blade system with multiple Processors assigned to each port, each blade, etc. Expensive af, but very much doable.
Posted on Reply
#40
Kwesi
Tom YumIt means they'll be able to burn through their monthly data cap in 8 minutes instead of 14.
Haha haaaa, cost also follows ...#:roll:

Protocols restructuring, and we can not escape that!!!
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 24th, 2024 22:58 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts