Wednesday, December 14th 2022

Sapphire Announces the Nitro+ Radeon RX 7900-series GPUs with Vapor-X Cooling

SAPPHIRE Technology announces the heavily anticipated NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Vapor-X Series Graphics Cards, with breakthrough performance and incredible clock speeds for both gamers and creators 4K and beyond. The cards are crafted with SAPPHIRE's signature cutting-edge cooling features, quality of life components and engineered to push high framerates with the optimal balance of heat and noise.

At the core of the NITRO+ Graphics Cards series are the technologies of the SAPPHIRE PANTHEON Suite of permanent features. SAPPHIRE PANTHEON guarantees supreme cooling technology and other distinct features exclusive to NITRO+ graphics cards. Each NITRO+ iconic feature stands as strong and permanent as the pillars of the PANTHEON. Every NITRO+ Graphics Card guarantees the presence of the stable, reliable and innovative SAPPHIRE PANTHEON suite of features.
Experience a new standard for ultra-enthusiast class gaming performance with the NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Graphics Card with Vapor-X technology. The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X Graphics Card headlines with 6144 stream processors running with two clock settings, including a Boost Clock of up to 2680 MHz and a Game Clock of up to 2510 MHz. It also offers 24 GB of high-speed GDDR6 memory clocked at 20 Gbps with 96 MB of second generation AMD Infinity Cache technology.

The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Vapor-X Graphics Card features a GPU with 84 Compute Units and 5376 stream processors, a Boost Clock of up to 2560 MHz and a Game Clock of up to 2220 MHz. Enjoy breakthrough performance on the NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X and XT respectively with 24 GB and 20 GB of GDDR6 high-speed memory clocked at up to 20 Gbps with 96 MB and 80 MB of Infinity Cache technology. The graphics card has support for up to 4 output ports including 2x HDMI 2.1 and 2x DisplayPort 2.1 ports with DSC outputs to support the latest monitors on the market.

Vapor-X Cooling is BACK
The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Vapor-X Series Graphics Cards are fitted out with the iconic Vapor-X Cooling. The Vapor Chamber is mounted in contact with the surface of the GPU and GDDR6 Memory. The Vapor-X cooler is fine-tuned to work with the other cooling components such as the fins, heatpipes and fans to bring the best efficiency to cool the GPU and components. Since the entire area transfers heat at the same rate, the Vapor-X module is engineered to work more efficiently than a copper heat sink at carrying away heat.

Upon gaining heat, the heat source is pushed to the Vaporization Wicks to begin the heat dissipation process. Due to extreme low pressure, working fluid and pure water are easily vaporized and moved through the vacuum until it reaches the Condensing Wick which is adjacent to the cooled surface. At this point, the vapor turns back to a liquid state whereby the liquid is then absorbed by the Transportation Wick by capillary action and moved back towards the Vaporization Wick. A recycled liquid system occurs when the heat source reheats the liquid and it becomes re-vaporized by the Vaporization Wick to restart the Vapor-X Cooling process. The Optimized Composite Heatpipes work in tandem with Vapor-X Cooling, fine-tuned for the cooling design, with optimal heat flow to efficiently and evenly spread out the heat to the entire cooling module.

Optimal Overclocking Potential
On NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX Vapor-X, 90 Ampere Mosfets for GPU with 12 phases is engineered onto the board. This digital power design provides a total of 1080 Ampere currents to the GPU, offering 28% more power delivery for the GPU in comparison to the standard AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX design, to push maximum overclocking potential.

NITRO+ Features to Maximize Your GPU
The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Series Vapor-X Graphics Cards are constructed with a die casted aluminium-magnesium alloy frame that strengthens the structural stiffness of the shroud and ensures durability whilst enveloping the sides of the PCB. Located on top of the frame is the Frontplate Heatsink which overlays the entire PCB to cool the VRM components as a dedicated VRM cooling module to create optimal heat dissipation for peak airflow and cooling performance.
The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Series Vapor-X Graphics Cards are equipped with the latest Angular Velocity Fan Blade Design to allow for greater airflow while simultaneously enabling quiet and cool operation. This design generates up to 44% more downward air pressure and up to 19% more airflow compared to previous generation fan blades.

The renowned and robust Tri-X Cooling Technology works in tandem with the Wave Fin Design to diminish friction and airflow which reduces noise, and the V Shape Fin Design for GPU Cooling to quicken and centralize airflow around the GPU to dissipate heat efficiently.

The GPU is mounted onto the High TG Copper PCB. Constructed of 14 layers of high-density 2oz copper PCB with a high TG [Glass Transition] temperature value PCB to match the power requirements of the GPU and memory and guarantee mechanical stability of the PCB during operation. The board design uses premium and efficient compact Ultra High Performance Conductive Polymer aluminium Capacitors which fully enables the 20-phase power design of the PCB.

Introducing the NEW Assistive System Fan Control
When the temperature of the GPU rises, the fans on the graphics card speed up accordingly. To aid in rapid cooling and heat dissipation, the new Assistive System Fan Control feature controls the speed of a system fan to automatically increase at the same time as the graphics card fans to assist in expelling hot air from the entire system faster.
Classic NITRO+ Favourite Features
Experience classic NITRO+ features like the fan-favourite Quick Connect Fan with just one screw holding the fan securely in place to easily remove, clean or replace the fan. Fans feature Dual Ball Bearing for up to 85% longer lifespan than sleeve bearing fans and for up to 10% less noise through fan blade improvements. Switch between Performance Mode to Silent Mode or back using our Dual BIOS feature and enable TriXX to switch easily between modes using the TriXX Software BIOS Switch. The high-quality aluminium Metal Backplate protects the components on the backside of the PCB and helps remove heat.

NITRO+ Aesthetics
For the ultimate customization, NITRO Glow enables gamers to personalize their battlestation aesthetic. The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Vapor-X Series Graphics Cards take it the next step further with the Dual ARGB Light Bar. Customize both the dual light bar and the ARGB Backplate to cultivate an exceptional and beautiful ambiance for your gaming setup.

Enable the external synchronization of RGB LEDs between the graphics card and the motherboard using the 3-pin header in the tail. Gamers can then choose if the graphics card performs the RGB LED effects independently or if the motherboard acquires control.
The NITRO+ AMD Radeon RX 7900 Vapor-X Series Graphics Cards is bundled with a Graphics Card Supporter to keep the graphics card in place on the PCIe Slot. Gamers can also find the optional ARGB Extension Cable to synchronize the NITRO+ Graphics Card with other ARGB components within the PC system.
Source: Sapphire
Add your own comment

54 Comments on Sapphire Announces the Nitro+ Radeon RX 7900-series GPUs with Vapor-X Cooling

#26
AsRock
TPU addict
thesmokingmanNo, was expecting four slot! :laugh:
Me too i wanted a cooler on my vcard to make my D15 look tiny.

They can be 5 slot for all i care :), cannot have enough cooling when the ambient can hit 34c.
Posted on Reply
#27
Operandi
NaterI mentioned it before in the forums and got shit on, but these cards are all 3+ slots already, they might as well design the video cards (and to some extent the mainboards) to use all the PCIe slots at least physically, if not electronically as well. Don't mount it with just ONE, mount it with 2, 3 even four PCIe slots at once. Might even save an 8 pin cable being used if they do it right. (draw 75w from each PCIe slot)
I got the same reaction when I said ATX 12VO was the future. Fact is pretty much everything about ATX decapitated and barely works at all, from cooling to layout. High-end GPUs needs tacked on support brackets otherwise the succumb to the force of gravity while being stationary let alone try shipping a system with a card of this class installed. Its really far past time to throw off all the legacy cruft and start innovating on the design front and not just tacking more RGB shit on everything.
Posted on Reply
#28
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
Kohl BaasI'd like to see AsRock's Formula too. My 6900 XT Formula is one of the best looking cards of the previous generation.

I wasnt a fan of the green
Posted on Reply
#29
Minus Infinity
I'm confused is this a new small form factor case or a gpu!
Posted on Reply
#30
Unregistered
DenverIf the cooling is so efficient why is the clock boost so conservative?

Curious to know if someone will dare to launch a 3Ghz version or AMD will end up launching it as 7970XTX 3Ghz with even faster memories from Samsung. :p
No idea why, the 7900XTX needs a bump in frequency to make it look less silly.

What is surprising is, CPUs don't suddenly cost that much while using the latest nodes, GPUs on the other hand offer modest gains are 100% more expensive than previous generation. Wouldn't surprise me if nVidia and AMD are doing something shady.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#31
AusWolf
Xex360No idea why, the 7900XTX needs a bump in frequency to make it look less silly.

What is surprising is, CPUs don't suddenly cost that much while using the latest nodes, GPUs on the other hand offer modest gains are 100% more expensive than previous generation. Wouldn't surprise me if nVidia and AMD are doing something shady.
The 7900 XTX costs exactly the same as the 6900 XT did at launch.
Posted on Reply
#32
kapone32
AusWolfThe 7900 XTX costs exactly the same as the 6900 XT did at launch.
There are 6950XTs more expensive than some 7900XTX cards. Unfortunately everyone wants that card and it makes the ability to actually get one not that simple yet. I even saw 4 different XT variants still available on Newegg which actually makes sense.
Posted on Reply
#33
AusWolf
kapone32There are 6950XTs more expensive than some 7900XTX cards. Unfortunately everyone wants that card and it makes the ability to actually get one not that simple yet. I even saw 4 different XT variants still available on Newegg which actually makes sense.
For only $100 difference at this performance level, I'd want the XTX as well.
Posted on Reply
#34
kapone32
AusWolfFor only $100 difference at this performance level, I'd want the XTX as well.
You got it. Until they release a 16GB 7700Xt (pure speculation) the XTX will be the card to get.
Posted on Reply
#35
AusWolf
kapone32You got it. Until they release a 16GB 7700Xt (pure speculation) the XTX will be the card to get.
Agreed. That's more like my target performance level anyway (the x700-level, I mean). If it ends up being decent with an OK price, maybe I'll buy one. If not, I'll just keep being happy with my 6750 XT. :)
Posted on Reply
#36
Nkd
This is the best looking so far. Too bad they didn't release it on launch looks like sapphire is little late. Newegg even had red devil and BB had XFX merc on launch. They went a little faster. May this design took longer due to them bad ass looking LEDs LMAO.
Posted on Reply
#37
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
AusWolfThe 7900 XTX costs exactly the same as the 6900 XT did at launch.
Which makes it a better deal, makes sense considering price/performance/power. Nv went retard
kapone32You got it. Until they release a 16GB 7700Xt (pure speculation) the XTX will be the card to get.
I have a feeling the 7900XT will be more popular due to sizing (atleast from gigabyte) the only bs i disagree with is the lack of 4G of ram on the XT model, it should be 24G like XTX.
Posted on Reply
#38
Arkz
Woof.

Only looks good from the backplate.
Posted on Reply
#40
kapone32
eidairaman1I have a feeling the 7900XT will be more popular due to sizing (atleast from gigabyte) the only bs i disagree with is the lack of 4G of ram on the XT model, it should be 24G like XTX.
Once the price comes down. They had to separate them somehow. I don't mind but for me (6800XT) that would feel more like a side grade than the XTX for 4GB of VRAM.
Posted on Reply
#41
Unregistered
AusWolfThe 7900 XTX costs exactly the same as the 6900 XT did at launch.
From what I've seen so far it is more expensive than the 6900XT, the best 6900XT were slightly cheaper than the cheapest 7900XTX.
But not as ridiculous as nVidia where the prices have basically doubled.
#42
AusWolf
Xex360From what I've seen so far it is more expensive than the 6900XT, the best 6900XT were slightly cheaper than the cheapest 7900XTX.
But not as ridiculous as nVidia where the prices have basically doubled.
Are you talking about launch prices? They both have exactly the same MSRP.
Posted on Reply
#44
btk2k2
bonehead123Well at least the body of the card is alot more stylish than the other brands that I've seen so far.... but the fact that it has only 2 DP + 2 HDMI (instead of 3+1) and NO USB-C makes it an automatic NO BUY for me....
Funnily enough this is the opposite for me. Since I plan to use 2x S95Bs (or the 2023 version) 2x HDMI makes it a lot easier.
Posted on Reply
#45
Unregistered
AusWolfAre you talking about launch prices? They both have exactly the same MSRP.
MSRP is fake price only valid for the US without tax, I'm talking about real prices we actually buy them for.
#46
AusWolf
Xex360MSRP is fake price only valid for the US without tax, I'm talking about real prices we actually buy them for.
Tax on a $1,000 card is the same as the tax on another $1,000 card, isn't it?
Posted on Reply
#47
kapone32
Xex360MSRP is fake price only valid for the US without tax, I'm talking about real prices we actually buy them for.
That is the narrative. Yet every single reference card had the exact same price on Newegg. There was even one on Canada Computers where a Gigabyte reference 7900XTX was $20 cheaper than the Gaming OC 7900XT. I live in Canada where we pay a serious premium (just like every one else) and can say that all reference cards have the same retail price which is about $10 over the MSRP when you do the conversion.
Posted on Reply
#48
Darmok N Jalad
OperandiThis is getting out of hand, somebody needs to pull ATX out of the stone age. ATX just wasn't designed to accommodate cards this big and heavy and the cooling is also very inefficient. Case, motheboard, and graphics card manufactures need to get on the same page and start making some revisions to ATX and really ultimately start transiting to some completely new thats built around the concept of the GPU being the most power hungry component in a modern gaming PC (or workstation).

As a stop-gap to a ground up new design put some standoffs on the case (on the motherboard panel), through holes on the motherboard, and add on structural supports on the graphics card that can physically mount to the standoffs on the case so the card is physically supported along more of its axis and not just at one point.
I was thinking this the other day, largely with the concept of the supplementary power cables and how and where they are connected. These cards are thick, huge, heavy, and the cable connector gets to hang out right at a place where, not only does it look ugly, but it has the potential to impede airflow and even add to the stress on the PCIe slot. The ATX design is certainly not ideal for premium hardware. GPUs are one thing, but let’s not forget CPUs needing either a massive, heavy air cooler or a water loop.

If I were to take a stab at this, the board design needs to move the CPU and GPU to the floor of the case, and the supplementary GPU power could ideally be routed through the motherboard through a standardized connection, perhaps through a revised PCIe spec for GPUs. If we must stay vertical, then a standardized GPU support system needs to be laid out.

The 2019 Mac Pro actually does this, where their custom GPU options use an extension slot for powering the card, and there is a support mount on the end of the card to reduce connector stress. The problem is that only their custom cards can take advantage of these changes, but you can still install traditional cards and power them with additional cables. Such a concept would allow for a transition period, but it does mean massive motherboards.
Posted on Reply
#49
Operandi
Yeah, there are so many ways you could design this from scratch if you didn't have any legacy restrictions, people don't want to throw out everything they have all at once for a new unproven standard. It would be fun to do some 3D concepts of what is possible and in my opinion something has to happen but I think they key is amending current standards that move in the direction of some sort end goal new standard layout.

I think the quick and dirty solution to these huge GPUs is amending current graphics cards, ATX cases and motherboard with places to secure the card structurally along the axis of the card. There could be 2-3 different points on the case and motherboard sort of like how there is different size M2 SSDs.

Thinking bigger new standards wise I really like the front to back dedicated graphics cooling concept of the Mac Pro and I think most people like towers for gaming PCs and workstations so it makes sense to look at that for inspiration. The graphics card PCB could remain exactly the same as traditional graphics cards just the heatsink would change from the open air concept everything uses now to a card with a huge heatsink that would fit into dedicated graphics section of the case and get fresh cool air from the front intakes and push the hot air directly out of the back of the case. If you give the card 5-6 slots worth of real estate for enthusiast class GPU you could have a fan mounted at the rear (could be part of the case or card) that would be exhaust and maybe one mounted in the middle of the card for a true push / pull configuration. The rear and mid mounted dedicated GPU fan would only have to run when its under load and the GPU would otherwise be kept cool with the front cases intake fan/s. There would also be a similar dedicated cooling section / chamber for CPU and motherboard VRM components.

That would all require coordination with case, motherboard, cooling and graphics card manufactures to support the standard of course but there could be transitional components that could work in both new and legacy formats that would make the transition to a new format easier.
Posted on Reply
#50
Minus Infinity
kapone32You got it. Until they release a 16GB 7700Xt (pure speculation) the XTX will be the card to get.
It will be 16GB with the 256 bit bus for sure. They won't go with 8GB.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 18:14 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts