Thursday, November 3rd 2022

AMD Announces the $999 Radeon RX 7900 XTX and $899 RX 7900 XT, 5nm RDNA3, DisplayPort 2.1, FSR 3.0 FluidMotion

AMD today announced the Radeon RX 7900 XTX and Radeon RX 7900 XT gaming graphics cards debuting its next-generation RDNA3 graphics architecture. The two new cards come at $999 and $899—basically targeting the $1000 high-end premium price point.
Both cards will be available on December 13th, not only the AMD reference design, which is sold through AMD.com, but also custom-design variants from the many board partners on the same day. AIBs are expected to announce their products in the coming weeks.

The RX 7900 XTX is priced at USD $999, and the RX 7900 XT is $899, which is a surprisingly small difference of only $100, for a performance difference that will certainly be larger, probably in the 20% range. Both Radeon RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT are using the PCI-Express 4.0 interface, Gen 5 is not supported with this generation. The RX 7900 XTX has a typical board power of 355 W, or about 95 W less than that of the GeForce RTX 4090. The reference-design RX 7900 XTX uses conventional 8-pin PCIe power connectors, as would custom-design cards, when they come out. AMD's board partners will create units with three 8-pin power connectors, for higher out of the box performance and better OC potential. The decision to not use the 16-pin power connector that NVIDIA uses was made "well over a year ago", mostly because of cost, complexity and the fact that these Radeons don't require that much power anyway.

The reference RX 7900-series board design has the same card height as the RX 6950 XT, but is just 1 cm longer, at 28.7 cm. It is also strictly 2.5 slots thick. There's some white illuminated elements, which are controllable, using the same software as on the Radeon RX 6000 Series. Both cards feature two DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, one HDMI 2.1a and one USB-C.
This is AMD's first attempt at a gaming GPU made of chiplets (multiple logic dies on a multi-chip module). The company has built MCM GPUs in the past, but those have essentially been the GPU die surrounded by HBM stacks. The new "Navi 31" GPU at the heart of the RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT features seven chiplets—a central large graphics compute die (GCD), surrounded by six memory control-cache dies (MCDs). The GCD is built on the TSMC 5 nm EUV silicon fabrication process—the same one on which AMD builds its "Zen 4" CCDs—while the MCDs are each fabricated on the TSMC 6 nm process.

The GCD contains the GPU's main graphics rendering machinery, including the front-end, the RDNA3 compute units, the Ray Accelerators, the display controllers, the media engine and the render backends. The GCD physically features 96 RDNA3 Unified Compute Units (CUs), for 6,144 stream processors. All 96 of these are enabled on the RX 7900 XTX. The RX 7900 XT has 84 out of 96 unified compute units enabled, which works out to 5,376 stream processors. The new RDNA3 next-generation compute unit introduces dual-issue stream processors, which essentially double their throughput generation-over-generation. This is a VLIW approach, AMD does not double the rated shader count though, so it's 6144 for the full GPU (96 CU x 64 shaders per CU, not 128 shaders per CU).

Each of the six MCDs contains a 64-bit wide GDDR6 memory interface, and 16 MB of Infinity Cache memory. Six of these MCDs add up to the GPU's 384-bit wide memory interface, and 96 MB of total Infinity Cache memory. The GCD addresses the 384-bit wide memory interface as a contiguous addressable block, and not 6x 64-bit. Most modern GPUs for the past decade have had multiple on-die memory controllers making up a larger memory interface, "Navi 31" moves these to separate chiplets. This approach reduces the size of the main GCD tile, which will help with yield rates. The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is configured with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory across the chip's entire 384-bit wide memory bus, while the RX 7900 XT gets 20 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 320-bit wide memory bus (one of the MCDs is disabled). The disabled MCD isn't not "missing", but there's some dummy silicon dies there to provide stability for the cooler mounting.

Each CU also features two AI acceleration components that provide a 2.7x uplift in AI inference performance over SIMD, and a second-generation RT accelerator that provides new dedicated instructions, and a 50% performance uplift in ray tracing performance. The AI cores are not exposed through software, software developers cannot use them directly (unlike NVIDIA's Tensor Cores), they are used exclusively by the GPU internal engines. Later today AMD will give us a more technical breakdown of the RDNA3 architecture.
For the RX 7900 XTX, AMD is broadly claiming an up to 70% increase in traditional raster 3D graphics performance over the previous-generation flagship RX 6950 XT at 4K Ultra HD native resolution; and an up to 60% increase in ray tracing performance. These gains should be good to catch RTX 4080, but AMD was clear that they are not targeting RTX 4090 performance, which comes at a much higher price point, too.
AMD is attributing its big 54% performance/Watt generational gains to a revolutionary asynchronous clock domain technology that runs the various components on the GCD at different frequencies, to minimize power draw. This seems similar in concept to the "shader clock" on some older NVIDIA architectures.
AMD also announced FSR 3.0, the latest generation of its performance enhancement, featuring Fluid Motion technology. This is functionally similar to DLSS 3 Frame Generation, promising a 100% uplift in performance at comparable quality—essentially because the GPU is generating every alternate frame without involving its graphics rendering pipeline.
The new dual-independent media-acceleration engines enable simultaneous encode and decode for AVC and HEVC formats; hardware-accelerated encode and decode for AV1, and AI-accelerated enhancements. The new AMD Radiance Display Engine introduces native support for DisplayPort 2.1, with 54 Gbps display link bandwidth, and 12 bpc color. This enables resolutions of up to 8K @ 165 Hz with a single cable; or 4K @ 480 Hz with a single cable.
The "Navi 31" GPU in its full configuration has a raw compute throughput of 61 TFLOPs, compared to 23 TFLOPs of the RDNA2-based Navi 21 (a 165% increase). The shader and front-end of the GPU operate at different clock speeds, with the shaders running at up to 2.30 GHz, and the front-end at up to 2.50 GHz. This decoupling has a big impact on power-savings, with AMD claiming a 25% power-saving as opposed to running both domains at the same 2.50 GHz clock.
AMD claims the Radeon RX 7900 XTX to offer a 70% performance increase over the RX 6950 XT.

The complete slide-deck follows.
Add your own comment

336 Comments on AMD Announces the $999 Radeon RX 7900 XTX and $899 RX 7900 XT, 5nm RDNA3, DisplayPort 2.1, FSR 3.0 FluidMotion

#1
TheLostSwede
News Editor
What's with the three copper coloured "blades" in the heatsink?
Posted on Reply
#2
Toss
Love it. No bells and whisles, just raw performance, without compromises with sane price.
AMD won this one for me.
Also future proofing DP is very important. nvidian lul 1.4 in 2k22 wtf.
Posted on Reply
#3
AnarchoPrimitiv
70% performance increase for the same price sounds good....at $1699 MSRP do people think the 4090 is 70% faster than the 7900xtx to justify the 70% increase in price?
Posted on Reply
#4
Toss
AnarchoPrimitiv70% performance increase for the price sounds good....at $1699 MSRP do people think the 4090 is 70% faster than the 7900xtx to justify the 70% increase in price?
I predict: nvidia faster up to 20% at 4k, and slower in 1080p.
Posted on Reply
#5
Iain Saturn
AnarchoPrimitiv70% performance increase for the same price sounds good....at $1699 MSRP do people think the 4090 is 70% faster than the 7900xtx to justify the 70% increase in price?
Prices will drop.

But otherwise I agree.
Posted on Reply
#6
phill
I like the look of those... Shame I don't need one but since when did that ever stop me....

Looking forward to the reviews for sure.....
Posted on Reply
#7
defaultluser
Well obviously when you target 20% slower than the massively-factory-overclocked 4090 then you don't need big-beefy

but I expect also that even the 4080 will reuse the same connector (to save them money by cutting connectors in-half), all whil being around the same perfr/watt as 7900 XTX
Posted on Reply
#8
pat-roner
Kinda crazy how little I care anout raytracing. Sure it looks nice, but in the game where I even notice, I don't really need competative FPS and stable 60 is enough
Posted on Reply
#9
Toss
Monitors will follow. Imagine buying RTX 4090 and get stuck with 4k144 forever.
My Overwatch 2 is running 600 fps at 4k, and sorry bruh you have to play 144 hz on your horsegarbo nvidia. What is this.
Posted on Reply
#10
TheLostSwede
News Editor
TossMonitors will follow. Imagine buying RTX 4090 and get stuck with 4k144 forever.
My Overwatch 2 is running 600 fps at 4k, and sorry bruh you have to play 144 hz on your horsegarbo nvidia. What is this.
4K 165Hz is possible over DP 1.4a with DSC.
Posted on Reply
#11
Toss
pat-ronerKinda crazy how little I care anout raytracing. Sure it looks nice, but in the game where I even notice, I don't really need competative FPS and stable 60 is enough
stable RAW w/o upscale 144 fps > any ray tracing for me
TheLostSwede4K 165Hz is possible over DP 1.4a with DSC.
not enough! I prefer 4k360 in 2 years.
Posted on Reply
#12
trsttte
Don't see any comparison to team green so they probably are far from the performance crown...

... but are cheaper, use less power and have up to date interfaces (DP2.1 and still maintain the USB-C virtuallink). Sounds like a winner (not in marketing but in practise probably pretty good)
TheLostSwedeWhat's with the three copper coloured "blades" in the heatsink?
Copper is pretty close to red, speed stripes :D
Posted on Reply
#13
Denver
70% faster than the 6950x is enough to touch the 4090, depending on the game. Regardless... With this price, my only question is: where to buy?
Posted on Reply
#14
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Denver70% faster than the 6950x is enough to touch the 4090, depending on the game. Regardless... With this price, my only question is: where to buy?
you wont be able to buy. bots and third party scalpers will get them all. wait and see.
trsttteDon't see any comparison to team green so they probably are far from the performance crown...

... but are cheaper, use less power and have up to date interfaces (DP2.1 and still maintain the USB-C virtuallink). Sounds like a winner (not in marketing but in practise probably pretty good)



Copper is pretty close to red, speed stripes :D
if you look at the slides, and compare them to 4090 review numbers, these cards beat the 4090 in AMD favored games like F1 22. by a good margin too.
Posted on Reply
#15
V3ctor
Thank you AMD....

This will bring older generations down in price big time.

Maybe an RTX 3070 can be sold for 250 to 300€ or the 3060.

I have an old RX 570 on my secondary PC that is begging to be sold. I need more performance to my old 4790K
Posted on Reply
#16
siluro818
TossI predict: nvidia faster up to 20% at 4k, and slower in 1080p.
No AMD have made similar changes to their CUs as Nvidia did with Ampere, so these cards' performance won't scale worse with resolution like RDNA2.
Posted on Reply
#17
Divide Overflow
Very attractive pricing and effortless upgrade compared to nvidia. Looking forward to W1zzard's review to make sure there's value for that money.
Posted on Reply
#18
Space Lynx
Astronaut
dont whant to set it'nVidia build to cost by skimping on DP2.0 when it comes to the 4089 series of graphics cards.

So, as aforementioned cards were gifted to influencers or sold to miners off the bat/blast furnace, thus denying most consumers the opportunity to buy one . Probably best spend my money elsewhere, cheers JH nV CEO.
leather jackets are expensive bro. leave off it
Posted on Reply
#19
THU31
I really enjoyed this announcement. It was all about gaming and content creation. NVIDIA talked about GPUs for 5 minutes and the rest was about AI and other bullshit.

These prices seem very aggressive. 7900 XTX should be faster than the 4080 in rasterization (XT probably on par), but not in ray tracing. And I love all the software things they are doing, especially FSR 2.2 that might become more popular.

I cannot wait to see the reviews. I hope it all turns out great. This is the first time I might consider switching to a Radeon card in over a decade.
Posted on Reply
#20
Ravenmaster
Nvidia is fucked if AMD's card can outperform the 4090 at that price.
Posted on Reply
#21
Space Lynx
Astronaut
THU31I really enjoyed this announcement. It was all about gaming and content creation. NVIDIA talked about GPUs for 5 minutes and the rest was about AI and other bullshit.

These prices seem very aggressive. 7900 XTX should be faster than the 4080 in rasterization (XT probably on par), but not in ray tracing. And I love all the software things they are doing, especially FSR 2.2 that might become more popular.

I cannot wait to see the reviews. I hope it all turns out great. This is the first time I might consider switching to a Radeon card in over a decade.
thats because nvidia knows the real money isn't with gamers. we are just side money to them at this point, even though we are the reason they exist. fuck them.

amd for life.
Posted on Reply
#22
btk2k2
Where is endnote 816? seems to be missing for the perf/watt claim.
Posted on Reply
#23
willcf15
Assuming the 7900XT is indeed within shooting range of the 4080 16GB (which it seems like it should be based on silicon) and cards are available for MSRP, I'll be switching teams. Even if NVidia backs off their insane pricing, I'll be going AMD on principle because it seems like they haven't lost touch with reality (both with pricing and power draw). The cost difference will nearly cover a shiny new Freesync monitor, and the 6-year-old Gsync one I'm using now will become a long-needed secondary. Well played AMD!
Posted on Reply
#24
Zaqq
Looks like people are disappointed because 1200€ cards are now for peasants...
Posted on Reply
#25
mb194dc
First shot fired in race that will drive gpu prices back down..? With a global recession, probably.

Also power is comparatively reasonable 355w.

Reviews will be interesting for performance. Can't trust the slides too much.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 23rd, 2024 20:09 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts