Wednesday, August 2nd 2023

Corsair Intros 180-degree 12VHPWR Power Bridge

Corsair rolled out a handy accessory that should help cable management in builds with graphics cards that have 16-pin 12VHPWR power connectors. Called simply the 12VHPWR GPU Power Bridge, the contraption inverts the power connector 180° as shown in the pictures below; so your power cable emerging from behind the motherboard tray doesn't have to make that turn. The Power Bridge hence reduces mechanical stress on the power cable from your PSU.

Unlike several such 180° power bridges of generic brands floating around online retail, some of which even convert 8-pin PCIe to a 12VHPWR; the Corsair Power Bridge comes with the quality assurance that comes with the badge. The company claims to have extensively tested it for endurance. The internal wiring between the two connectors on the bridge is tested to withstand 105 °C temperatures. Please note, that the bridge is not physically compatible with the ASUS ROG Strix and TUF Gaming graphics cards. The company is backing this with a 1-year warranty.
Add your own comment

32 Comments on Corsair Intros 180-degree 12VHPWR Power Bridge

#26
Vayra86
mechtechWell. I wish Corsair would revise their psu power cables. Just installed an RM650x (2021) and they put a heavy duty hot glue heat shrink at the end. It was so stiff I had to run the cpu cable over the gpu instead of behind the mobo. :|
Oh yeah that's great too, short or too stiff CPU cable from the PSU. I have a case with a cheaper PSU in it and it just fits, as in, I have to literally hammer out every bit of flex there still is in that cable to jam the connector in the board. I hope I don't ever have to remove it, might have to cut the cable itself lol
Posted on Reply
#27
AusWolf
Vayra86Check this out, a 360 degree connector! Twice as good for a fraction of the cost :roll:



instead of a 180 degree (??? isn't that a U turn straight back into the device it came from) connector to make that very much required 90 degree bend (?!) on a GPU that could have also just not have its connector in the very middle of what is generally known as a chonker' size of GPUs. I mean.. its not like there isn't space to move that to anywhere else... like the end of the shroud as is common practice for a few decades. Its not like Nvidia should've just delivered a proper bent adapter in the first place either, right. Or the fact there isn't a form factor limitation wrt the connector in the first place given 3 slot is the norm. How about a 90 degree bend towards the END of the GPU instead as well; no airflow obstruction and no added height to the entire contraption either. Even a child could think of these options.

Fucking ridiculous BS, this whole affair honestly just screams 'lazy as shit design choices' that mostly don't even feel like a choice, but rather an 'oopsie, we didn't figure that out in all of the five minutes we took printing this plastic POS'.

The cherry on top really is that these connectors are used in supposed premium products in the very top end of the leading GPU brand too. Fools & Money. Its about as bad as buying your all white mobo with every PCIe and RAM slot still in pitch black because hey that's the off the shelf part, too much effort to spray it white on 'premium' product costing well over twice what it should.


There is not a single tangible advantage here, nor necessity. The form factor doesn't require it. PSUs don't require it. The TDPs don't require it. A supposed 600W GPU takes four whopping slots anyway, they could just as well place 4 8 pins on top of one another at that point, and to be honest I reckon it'd look badass that way if they're placed at the end of the shroud, not its side.
Welcome to the 1970s when your $1m Lamborghini supercar has a turn signal stalk from a Toyota pickup truck.
Posted on Reply
#28
claes
Vayra86Check this out, a 360 degree connector! Twice as good for a fraction of the cost :roll:



instead of a 180 degree (??? isn't that a U turn straight back into the device it came from) connector to make that very much required 90 degree bend (?!) on a GPU that could have also just not have its connector in the very middle of what is generally known as a chonker' size of GPUs. I mean.. its not like there isn't space to move that to anywhere else... like the end of the shroud as is common practice for a few decades. Its not like Nvidia should've just delivered a proper bent adapter in the first place either, right. Or the fact there isn't a form factor limitation wrt the connector in the first place given 3 slot is the norm. How about a 90 degree bend towards the END of the GPU instead as well; no airflow obstruction and no added height to the entire contraption either. Even a child could think of these options.

Fucking ridiculous BS, this whole affair honestly just screams 'lazy as shit design choices' that mostly don't even feel like a choice, but rather an 'oopsie, we didn't figure that out in all of the five minutes we took printing this plastic POS'.

The cherry on top really is that these connectors are used in supposed premium products in the very top end of the leading GPU brand too. Fools & Money. Its about as bad as buying your all white mobo with every PCIe and RAM slot still in pitch black because hey that's the off the shelf part, too much effort to spray it white on 'premium' product costing well over twice what it should.


There is not a single tangible advantage here, nor necessity. The form factor doesn't require it. PSUs don't require it. The TDPs don't require it. A supposed 600W GPU takes four whopping slots anyway, they could just as well place 4 8 pins on top of one another at that point, and to be honest I reckon it'd look badass that way if they're placed at the end of the shroud, not its side.
So glad I don’t feel like I need to write an essay every time I’m mad at the man
Posted on Reply
#29
Chrispy_
Vayra86There is not a single tangible advantage here, nor necessity. The form factor doesn't require it. PSUs don't require it. The TDPs don't require it.
The thing I really don't understand is the move away from MiniFit Jr - nice big pins and a little over 4A per wire/pin which is super safe, reliable, and robust.

12VHPWR not only doubles the current to 8.5A per wire/pin, it halves the contact patches per pin. If you're going to double the current, FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THINGS HOLY, DO NOT HALVE THE SIZE OF THE CONDUCTORS.

Nvidia uses 14 of the 16 pins in the HPWR connector - 6x12V, 6xGND, and two sense wires.



What was wrong with this 14-pin MiniFit Jr, exactly? It's less than half the size of the 3x8Pin previously used for 450W designs, and unlike 12V HPWR, the connector has a FORTY YEAR history of not being shit and has never required any alterations or revisions because it wasn't designed by a combination of sheeple and idiots.
Posted on Reply
#30
claes
It’s an fortunate thing that the members of TPU were around in the 90’s to prevent all of the 400W+ components from catching fire
Posted on Reply
#31
Chrispy_
claesIt’s an fortunate thing that the members of TPU were around in the 90’s to prevent all of the 400W+ components from catching fire
Haha, 400W in the 90's :laugh:
In the 90's the most power hungry components I had access to required a heatsink :


But MiniFit Jr had been carrying 10A loads in the automotive industry long before the PC industry even adopted Molex.
Posted on Reply
#32
Mr. Perfect
Chrispy_Haha, 400W in the 90's :laugh:
In the 90's the most power hungry components I had access to required a heatsink :


But MiniFit Jr had been carrying 10A loads in the automotive industry long before the PC industry even adopted Molex.
Oh man, that brings back memories. My first PC had the 486-DX2, but the madman who built it for us put a 40mmx10mm fan on the heatsink and overclocked it to 99MHz! Benched faster than a 90MHz Pentium, great for games.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 29th, 2024 09:36 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts