Tuesday, January 2nd 2024

Alleged Intel Core i9-14900KS Pictured

At the 2023 International CES, Intel had announced its 65 W (locked) 13th Gen Core "Raptor Lake" desktop processors, but the star of the show then was the enthusiast-segment Core i9-13900KS Limited Edition processor. A picture of what is allegedly the i9-14900KS, suggests that Intel might repeat its last year's CES announcements, with the i9-14900KS. Last time around, they had the claim to launch the world's first 6 GHz processor, something that is also the latest maximum boost frequency of the current i9-14900K, so it remains to be see what the i9-14900KS brings to the table. A 6 GHz all-core boost for the P-cores, or a speed bump that lets it finally beat the $350 Ryzen 7 7800X3D at gaming? We'll find out next week in Vegas.
Source: HXL (Twitter)
Add your own comment

36 Comments on Alleged Intel Core i9-14900KS Pictured

#1
Chaitanya
As if the "refresh" of refresh wasnt recieved well enough here we have more waste of silicon.
Posted on Reply
#2
aytokpatop
Ahh.. the newer KS... Good choise if you found it cheap and living in the North Pole,
Lets see which AΙΟ can master a non underrvoted 14900KS...
Posted on Reply
#3
wNotyarD
KS is the new EE (Emergency Edition).

Meanwhile, wallets and coolers everywhere are going :twitch: :wtf:
Posted on Reply
#4
Dirt Chip
One thing is for sure- Intel will suppress their last CPU wattage record.

So much more for sooo much less.
Posted on Reply
#5
ymdhis
wNotyarDKS is the new EE (Emergency Edition).

Meanwhile, wallets and coolers everywhere are going :twitch: :wtf:
I remember the P4EE needed to run at over twice the clock rate to properly beat the A64 FX chips in all benchmarks. It was crazy.
Posted on Reply
#6
ThrashZone
wNotyarDKS is the new EE (Emergency Edition).

Meanwhile, wallets and coolers everywhere are going :twitch: :wtf:
Hi,
Guess they found somewhere else to eat lunch than KFC
Now the trivia question is which lunch spot is EE
I'd guess Extremely Expensive :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#7
Tropick
Can't wait to hear all about how efficient this CPU actually is if you just disable all the e-cores, turn off hyperthreading, lock it to 65W, and use DDR5-8600 memory..
Posted on Reply
#8
kondamin
I'd rather see some MTL in a minisforum box
Posted on Reply
#9
chispy
This has been proven to be 100% fake click and bait for views article. What i heard from my sources in the industry is there won't be a 14900KS as the silicon on the 14900K is already 100% maxed out.
Posted on Reply
#10
ir_cow
TropickCan't wait to hear all about how efficient this CPU actually is if you just disable all the e-cores, turn off hyperthreading, lock it to 65W, and use DDR5-8600 memory..
Don't forget to only use 1 DIMM and disable half of it for DDR5-12000.
Posted on Reply
#11
ThrashZone
chispyThis has been proven to be 100% fake click and bait for views article. What i heard from my sources in the industry is there won't be a 14900KS as the silicon on the 14900K is already 100% maxed out.
Hi,
There's got to be a KFC I means these shysters still have to eat :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#12
dj-electric
chispyThis has been proven to be 100% fake click and bait for views article. What i heard from my sources in the industry is there won't be a 14900KS as the silicon on the 14900K is already 100% maxed out.
Here's an honest advice from me, and uh... come visit this post a few weeks. Fire your sources.
Posted on Reply
#13
Sabotaged_Enigma
13900KSS you guys like this name?
no? then how about 13900KS+
still no?
Oh yeah 13900KS X/XT/Ti/SUPER/Pro/Plus/Max pick whatever you like lol
Posted on Reply
#14
kapone32
Intel trying to get some of the noise coming out of CES.
Posted on Reply
#15
ThrashZone
dj-electricHere's an honest advice from me, and uh... come visit this post a few weeks. Fire your sources.
Hi,
I'd bet that translates better in your native language = English not so much except the last part.
Posted on Reply
#16
dj-electric
ThrashZoneHi,
I'd bet that translates better in your native language = English not so much except the last part.
Have you ever been fired or had to fire someone? seems to work pretty great.
Posted on Reply
#17
nguyenthucbk
ymdhisI remember the P4EE needed to run at over twice the clock rate to properly beat the A64 FX chips in all benchmarks. It was crazy.
I remember that it was not that bad
Pentium 4 EE 3.2 Ghz 1C2T sk478 on par with FX51 2.2 Ghz 1C1T
Pentium 4 EE 3.73 Ghz 1C2T sk775 in the middle of FX53 2.4Ghz and FX55 2.6Ghz

Pentium EE 965 3.73x2 Ghz 2C4T also same per with athlon x2 2,4~2,6Hhz

it's twice clock rate is compared with Core 2 Duo 6000 series only
Posted on Reply
#18
Assimilator
TropickCan't wait to hear all about how efficient this CPU actually is if you just disable all the e-cores, turn off hyperthreading, lock it to 65W, and use DDR5-8600 memory..
But this forum is about overclocking and tweaking, as such any suggestion that one might better spend their time or money on just buying a different CPU that doesn't need to be tweaked to hell and gone to perform decently is obviously deliberate and hurtful trolling and you should just leave us all alone, waaaa!!!

- the people you're referring to, probably
Posted on Reply
#19
ThrashZone
Hi,
I like this part
6 GHz all-core boost for the P-cores, or a speed bump that lets it finally beat the $350 Ryzen 7 7800X3D at gaming?
Only thing left out is intel made another 600.us+- chip to beat a 350.us+- chip
Not sure what intel is thinking or why they thought this was a good thing to prove :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#20
atomek
A 6 GHz all-core boost for the P-cores, or a speed bump that lets it finally beat the $350 Ryzen 7 7800X3D at gaming?
I'm looking forward for Factorio benchmarks ;)
Posted on Reply
#22
bug
TropickCan't wait to hear all about how efficient this CPU actually is if you just disable all the e-cores, turn off hyperthreading, lock it to 65W, and use DDR5-8600 memory..
You only need to limit PL1 and PL2 to keep them in their efficient zone. No need to mess with anything else.
Posted on Reply
#23
ThrashZone
Hi,
I'm pretty sure intel still uses really dumb short timers.
Posted on Reply
#24
YoRkFiElD
Lol even the 13900K is beating the shitty AMD 7800X3D :roll:
Posted on Reply
#25
kapone32
YoRkFiElDLol even the 13900K is beating the shitty AMD 7800X3D :roll:
For almost $150 more where I live it has to be applied to the equation.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 21st, 2024 20:05 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts