Monday, July 8th 2024

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X Benchmarked in Geekbench 6, Beats Intel's Best in Single-Core Score

As AMD prepares to roll out its next-generation Ryzen 9000 series of CPUs based on Zen 5 architecture, we are starting to see some systems being tested by third-party OEMs and system integrators. Today, we have Geekbench 6 scores of the Ryzen 9 9900X CPU, and the 12-core, 24-thread processor that has demonstrated impressive performance gains. Boasting a base clock of 4.4 GHz and a boost clock of up to 5.6 GHz, the CPU features only 120 W TDP, a significant reduction from the previous 170 W of the previous generation. In Geekbench 6 tests, the Ryzen 9 9900X achieved a single-core score of 3,401 and a multicore score of 19,756.

These results place it ahead of Intel's current flagship Core i9-14900KS, which scored 3,189 points in single-core performance. Regarding multicore tasks, the i9-14900K scored 21,890 points, still higher than AMD's upcoming 12-core SKU. The benchmark of AMD's CPU was conducted on an ASUS ROG Crosshair X670E Gene motherboard with 32 GB of DDR5 memory. As anticipation builds for the official release, these early benchmarks suggest that AMD will deliver a compelling product that balances high performance with improved energy efficiency. The top tier models will still carry a 170 W TDP, while some high-end and middle-end SKUs get a TDP reduction like the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600X dial down to 65 W, decreased from 105 W in their previous iterations.
Sources: Geekbench v6, via Wccftech
Add your own comment

105 Comments on AMD Ryzen 9 9900X Benchmarked in Geekbench 6, Beats Intel's Best in Single-Core Score

#101
lamonz88
ymdhisAnd then AMD will release the X3D variants.
The X3D V-cache will do nothing for this. It's just for gamers.

We need an increase in L2 cache
Posted on Reply
#102
RootinTootinPootin
lamonz88The X3D V-cache will do nothing for this. It's just for gamers.

We need an increase in L2 cache
if they did a huge boost to L1 and L2, then there is no point in selling the X3D parts if it won't be "Significantly" faster/better than the non-X3D parts with boosted L1 and L2 caches, if its just gonna be "single-digit" gains from the boosted cache of L1 and L2 then nobody would even buy the full fledged X3D at their price point.
Posted on Reply
#103
stimpy88
RootinTootinPootinif they did a huge boost to L1 and L2, then there is no point in selling the X3D parts if it won't be "Significantly" faster/better than the non-X3D parts with boosted L1 and L2 caches, if its just gonna be "single-digit" gains from the boosted cache of L1 and L2 then nobody would even buy the full fledged X3D at their price point.
And here lies AMDs problem with deliberately nerfing a CPU so that you can market the fixed version a few months later for more money. 3D cache was great when it first came out, but now it's just a cache-grab, and is making the regular CPU look bad.
Posted on Reply
#104
RootinTootinPootin
stimpy88And here lies AMDs problem with deliberately nerfing a CPU so that you can market the fixed version a few months later for more money. 3D cache was great when it first came out, but now it's just a cache-grab, and is making the regular CPU look bad.
AGESA updates will nerf the initial release performance more, I can guarantee on that, been there, done that.
Posted on Reply
#105
stimpy88
RootinTootinPootinAGESA updates will nerf the initial release performance more, I can guarantee on that, been there, done that.
At least from what I have seen, AMD has set the power limits on the 9700x far to aggressively. 65w TDP is just too low for 8-core desktop computing. 75w-90w and it will shine.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Nov 21st, 2024 09:24 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts