Tuesday, February 4th 2025

Reports of Bricked NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and RTX 5090D Surge

According to widespread user reports from Chinese tech forums and Reddit communities, multiple RTX 5090 and 5090D graphics cards are failing permanently after standard driver installation. The issue affects both the standard RTX 5090 and the export-modified 5090D variant released for the Chinese market on January 30th. Users report consistent failure patterns: upon initial driver installation, displays go dark, and systems permanently lose the ability to detect the GPU through both DisplayPort and HDMI interfaces. Hardware failures have been documented across multiple board partners, with Colorful, Manli, and Gigabyte cards showing identical symptoms. Third-party vendor reports sometimes indicate potential IC burn damage, suggesting hardware-level failure rather than recoverable software issues.

Some investigations point to PCIe Gen 5 implementation as a possible root cause. The RTX 5090 series represents NVIDIA's first fully Gen 5-compliant GPU architecture, introducing new signal integrity challenges. Some users report temporary mitigation by forcing PCIe 4.0 mode in BIOS settings, though this workaround remains unverified. Additional complications arise from modern motherboard designs that share PCIe lanes between M.2 storage and graphics slots. The failure pattern appears consistent across both domestic and international markets. On r/ASUS, users report identical detection failures persisting through CMOS resets and system rebuilds. Chinese forum documentation shows systematic failures across multiple board partner implementations, suggesting a fundamental architecture or driver compatibility issue rather than isolated manufacturing defects. NVIDIA has not issued official guidance on the failures.
Below are screenshots of the reported user problems:

Sources: Chiphell, Baidu, Goofish, r/ASUS, via Wccftech
Add your own comment

84 Comments on Reports of Bricked NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 and RTX 5090D Surge

#26
Daven
AssimilatorThis is such a stupid non-argument. Of course NVIDIA tested it with PCIe 5.0 motherboards, otherwise every man and their dog would be complaining. The fact the latter is not happening should, but apparently hasn't, clue you into the fact that maybe, just maybe, these isolated reports are either user error or incompatibility issues with specific motherboards and their firmware.
Here we go again…blame the motherboard manufacturers. Intel tried this and failed. I don’t see Nvidia faring any better.
Crackong3000 Series - Teaches people backside capacitor knowledge
4000 Series - Teaches people cables, connectors, electrical resistance and contact surfaces knowledge
5000 Series - Teaches people IC burn and signal integrity ?????


Love the comment!

For the life of me, I still can’t understand why Nvidia has such a cult following worse than even Apple fans.
Posted on Reply
#27
Markosz
Yikes... imagine spending over $2k just to look at a black screen.
How is this even possible after all the review samples with no issues?
Posted on Reply
#28
Assimilator
outlw6669Assuming it is 'just' PCIe 5.0 issues, and not component failures on the GPUs...
My question is then, if it is an issue with PCIe 5.0 on specific motherboards.

Other than PCIe 5.0 NVMEs, to the best of my knowledge, there have been no consumer PCIe 5.0 devices released, with which the motherboards could be tested.
I find it conceivable, that some motherboard designs tried to cut costs too hard, and have compromised PCIe 5.0 connectivity.
Since these are the first 5.0 GPUs using the 16x slot, perhaps a preexisting issue is just now coming to light?
Thank you for having one of the only sane posts in this thread.
Posted on Reply
#29
AGlezB
Crackong3000 Series - Teaches people backside capacitor knowledge
4000 Series - Teaches people cables, connectors, electrical resistance and contact surfaces knowledge
5000 Series - Teaches people IC burn and signal integrity ?????


You forgot:
2000 Series - Teaches people the "importance" of Ray-Tracing. Lessons continue to this day.

:laugh:
Posted on Reply
#30
Bomby569
i stand corrected, there is a God after all
Posted on Reply
#31
AusWolf
Because only AMD makes mistakes in their drivers, Nvidia is perfect, obviously. ;)
outlw6669Assuming it is 'just' PCIe 5.0 issues, and not component failures on the GPUs...
My question is then, if it is an issue with PCIe 5.0 on specific motherboards.

Other than PCIe 5.0 NVMEs, to the best of my knowledge, there have been no consumer PCIe 5.0 devices released, with which the motherboards could be tested.
I find it conceivable, that some motherboard designs tried to cut costs too hard, and have compromised PCIe 5.0 connectivity.
Since these are the first 5.0 GPUs using the 16x slot, perhaps a preexisting issue is just now coming to light?
Plausible, but why does it present itself only upon driver install, then?

By the way, it's funny that it's always x90 cards that have these problems, never below.
Posted on Reply
#32
bug
If this is a hardware issue and custom designs were custom, they wouldn't all be vulnerable to the same flaw. Would they?
Posted on Reply
#33
Bomby569
AusWolfBy the way, it's funny that it's always x90 cards that have these problems, never below.
because they are the 1st to come out, time to fix the others
Posted on Reply
#34
outlw6669
AusWolfBecause only AMD makes mistakes in their drivers, Nvidia is perfect, obviously. ;)


Plausible, but why does it present itself only upon driver install, then?

By the way, it's funny that it's always x90 cards that have these problems, never below.
A poster postulated earlier, that the GPU defaults to a slower PCIe link speed for compatibility, until the driver is loaded and initialized.
If this were the case, upon loading the driver, it could switch from a working, slower, PCIe speed to non-functional PCIe 5.0.

Unless this sets a persistent marker on the GPU itself though, display output would/should still be working fine until the OS loads the drivers.
It could then be that those having issues have Quick Start activated, and are Shutting Down instead of Restarting?

Or, perhaps, upon initializing PCIe 5.0 on certain motherboards, some component is being overloaded, and shorting out.

Without having a system fail in the hands of a reputable source, it is really hard to tell what is going on.
Hopefully it is properly investigated by nVidia, AIB, and MB manufacturers, with a timely fix being provided.
Posted on Reply
#35
Vya Domus
I guess even trillions of dollars of evaluation can't guarantee functioning products. Thank God there weren't that many of these available for purchase anyway.
Posted on Reply
#36
Bomby569
Vya DomusI guess even trillions of dollars of evaluation can't guaranteed functioning products. Thank God there weren't that many of these available for purchase anyway.
i bet with you the AI stuff gets triple checked.
It's the gamers fault for being so cheap, the 5090 should have cost at least 10.000usd to get to QC
Posted on Reply
#37
dyonoctis
R0H1TGood job shilling for arguably the scummiest $3 trillion company in the world & that's saying something considering the other one is a cult :rolleyes:
You don't become a trillion dollar company by being that stupid and willingly selling hardware that fail faster than a raptor lake CPU though. The RTX 4000 not being fool proof was one thing. You can call that negligence for not trying how that plug would behave when mistakes happens. But that? That's the kind of stuff that makes a company going bankrupt if it happens regularly. The product need to at least work. Companies that knows how to pull mindshare know that you can't afford to pill up that kind of screw up. It destroys the mindshare. Ask Samsung.

It's the kind of stuff that made them lose Apple as customers back the days (Geforce laptops would suffer a sudden death because the chip soldering was giving out. Bumpgate) They've lost billions, had to ship GPUs for free to replace those that died, and reportedly got verbally assaulted by Apple staff.
Posted on Reply
#38
Denver
It's not a minor problem. With such limited stock, we're already seeing reports of dying GPUs popping up by the dozen on the internet(Reddit, forums). Imagine what would happen in a normal scenario.

Grab your torches and rakes and head for Jensen's house!
Posted on Reply
#39
kapone32
I could have sworn there was a post on TPU about Enterprise level 5000 cards Overheating. With the fact that only the most desperate bought these, it does not bode well if we are getting reports of Failures.
Posted on Reply
#40
Bwaze
dyonoctisYou don't become a trillion dollar company by being that stupid and willingly selling hardware that fail faster than a raptor lake CPU though. The RTX 4000 not being fool proof was one thing. You can call that negligence for not trying how that plug would behave when mistakes happens. But that? That's the kind of stuff that makes a company going bankrupt if it happens regularly. The product need to at least work. Companies that knows how to pull mindshare know that you can't afford to pill up that kind of screw up. It destroys the mindshare. Ask Samsung.

It's the kind of stuff that made them lose Apple as customers back the days (Geforce laptops would suffer a sudden death because the chip soldering was giving out. Bumpgate) They've lost billions, had to ship GPUs for free to replace those that died, and reportedly got verbally assaulted by Apple staff.
But I think the times are slowly becoming very different now. Large companies are slowly gaining more and more power to present the reality as they see fit, and there is very little journalism that stands in their way. Several large screw-ups were publicized just by a handful of brave YouTube influencers / reviewers that are kind of celebrities companies still don't dare to take down. For now. Old type review sites? They are usually playing it safe, wait for somebody else to report the issue, and then publish the "according to" article, if even that. And the review sites that dared to be on the side of customers? You can ask AnandTech, HardOCP and many others how that worked out...

Even the issues that get published are often brushed aside as rare cases, user errors, comments are ful of whataboutisms of fanboys that feel they have to defend their favourite megacorporation...
Posted on Reply
#41
bug
BwazeBut I think the times are slowly becoming very different now. Large companies are slowly gaining more and more power to present the reality as they see fit, and there is very little journalism that stands in their way. Several large screw-ups were publicized just by a handful of brave YouTube influencers / reviewers that are kind of celebrities companies still don't dare to take down. For now. Old type review sites? They are usually playing it safe, wait for somebody else to report the issue, and then publish the "according to" article, if even that. And the review sites that dared to be on the side of customers? You can ask AnandTech, HardOCP and many others how that worked out...

Even the issues that get published are often brushed aside as rare cases, user errors, comments are ful of whataboutisms of fanboys that feel they have to defend their favourite megacorporation...
That has little to do with (size of) companies and everything to do with journalism. The less you care about your reputation, the more you can afford to publish news before it's properly verified.
If you want to bring companies into this, they are held to an even higher standard as a simple "our products seem to fail" post, without a proper root-cause analysis can earn you criminal charges, since it can be interpreted as an attempt to manipulate stock.
Posted on Reply
#42
Daven
BwazeBut I think the times are slowly becoming very different now. Large companies are slowly gaining more and more power to present the reality as they see fit, and there is very little journalism that stands in their way. Several large screw-ups were publicized just by a handful of brave YouTube influencers / reviewers that are kind of celebrities companies still don't dare to take down. For now. Old type review sites? They are usually playing it safe, wait for somebody else to report the issue, and then publish the "according to" article, if even that. And the review sites that dared to be on the side of customers? You can ask AnandTech, HardOCP and many others how that worked out...

Even the issues that get published are often brushed aside as rare cases, user errors, comments are ful of whataboutisms of fanboys that feel they have to defend their favourite megacorporation...
One of my posts was already hidden by the moderator even though I was just trying to say all companies have problems. Many sites must be worried about showing that their is no real difference between the different manufacturers. It’s all hype and even worse with W1zzard blaming other companies for not having Nvidia proprietary technologies (i.e. DLSS).

There is a lot of protectionism around Nvidia so it’s hard to get good verifiable information whether it’s true or false.
Posted on Reply
#43
Bwaze
bugIf you want to bring companies into this, they are held to an even higher standard as a simple "our products seem to fail" post, without a proper root-cause analysis can earn you criminal charges, since it can be interpreted as an attempt to manipulate stock.
Can't imagine that bring the danger when Intel denied their CPUs we're failing, blamed users, even denied RMAs from reviewers, and had to be practically bullied after several months of denial into confession - and even then they brushed it aside as very rare instances.
Posted on Reply
#44
Daven
BwazeCan't imagine that bring the danger when Intel denied their CPUs we're failing, blamed users, even denied RMAs from reviewers, and had to be practically bullied after several months of denial into confession - and even then they brushed it aside as very rare instances.
At least Patty Cakes was fired for that and probably other things. The big leather jacket will probably get the medal of freedom.
Posted on Reply
#45
kapone32
bugThat has little to do with (size of) companies and everything to do with journalism. The less you care about your reputation, the more you can afford to publish news before it's properly verified.
If you want to bring companies into this, they are held to an even higher standard as a simple "our products seem to fail" post, without a proper root-cause analysis can earn you criminal charges, since it can be interpreted as an attempt to manipulate stock.
It is not even journalism in some cases. it is propaganda. We live in this Spy vs Spy world where if this thread had AMD in the title the bombastic comments would have started. What is also true is that regardless of how badly Nvidia do or how desultory they behave people will always defend them. They did have Hardware Unboxed come back early from Fly Fishing in the Indian Ocean though. They literally created a new spec to deal with the new connector that was allegedly burning in some cases.
Posted on Reply
#46
loracle706
Hallelujah !!! and for the dumbs, rich people and influensuckers never buy a gpu or a game day one, and hope that company of thieves fells more and more !!
Posted on Reply
#47
neatfeatguy
AusWolfBecause only AMD makes mistakes in their drivers, Nvidia is perfect, obviously. ;)


Plausible, but why does it present itself only upon driver install, then?

By the way, it's funny that it's always x90 cards that have these problems, never below.
Not sure why it would show itself only upon driver install. Odd things happen.

I had a MB back during the end era of Vista (I started using Vista about a year before 7 released) when I upgraded to a new CPU/MB. I had multiple GPUs to test with (I think a GTX 280 and a 8800 GTS 512MB, but not 100% if those were the cards I had at the time....it's been a long while so memory might be off) when I had issues with a new MB.
Got everything setup and Vista installed - booted into Windows without a hitch.
Installed all the driver updates from the disc that came with the MB - no issues.
Installed the GPU driver and the system completely locked up. Windows would freeze most of the time or it would BSOD.
Maybe a GPU driver issue? Tried multiple WHQL drivers - same problem.
Maybe a GPU issue? Swapped GPUs, tried multiple drivers - same problem.
Maybe an OS issue? Wiped the drive, installed XP - no issue. Install GPU driver and the system would lock up. Tried the other GPU and multiple drivers - same problem.

I don't know what the problem was, but when I installed any driver for my cards the whole thing would lock up or occasionally BSOD. I contacted ASRock about it, their tech team asked me a slew of questions and offered suggestions and nothing worked. They said RMA. Got the replacement MB and the problem was no more.

This could be a driver issue or a MB issue with the 5090 having problems. Guess we just wait and see. Too bad for those that have a broken card, they're the ones that really have to suffer. Hopefully they have a backup GPU they can use for now.
Posted on Reply
#48
Dr. Dro
outlw6669Assuming it is 'just' PCIe 5.0 issues, and not component failures on the GPUs...
My question is then, if it is an issue with PCIe 5.0 on specific motherboards.

Other than PCIe 5.0 NVMEs, to the best of my knowledge, there have been no consumer PCIe 5.0 devices released, with which the motherboards could be tested.
I find it conceivable, that some motherboard designs tried to cut costs too hard, and have compromised PCIe 5.0 connectivity.
Since these are the first 5.0 GPUs using the 16x slot, perhaps a preexisting issue is just now coming to light?
These are my thoughts exactly, particularly on lower cost motherboards. Tolerances on Gen 5 spec are very strict. I see cheaper B650E, X670E and Z690 motherboards possibly faltering here. Though probably nothing some timing adjustments won't fix, either BIOS or VBIOS side.
neatfeatguyNot sure why it would show itself only upon driver install. Odd things happen.

I had a MB back during the end era of Vista (I started using Vista about a year before 7 released) when I upgraded to a new CPU/MB. I had multiple GPUs to test with (I think a GTX 280 and a 8000 GTS 512MB, but not 100% if those were the cards I had at the time....it's been a long while so memory might be off) when I had issues with a new MB.
Got everything setup and Vista installed - booted into Windows without a hitch.
Installed all the driver updates from the disc that came with the MB - no issues.
Installed the GPU driver and the system completely locked up. Windows would freeze most of the time or it would BSOD.
Maybe a GPU driver issue? Tried multiple WHQL drivers - same problem.
Maybe a GPU issue? Swapped GPUs, tried multiple drivers - same problem.
Maybe an OS issue? Wiped the drive, installed XP - no issue. Install GPU driver and the system would lock up. Tried the other GPU and multiple drivers - same problem.

I don't know what the problem was, but when I installed any driver for my cards the whole thing would lock up or occasionally BSOD. I contacted ASRock about it, their tech team asked me a slew of questions and offered suggestions and nothing worked. They said RMA. Got the replacement MB and the problem was no more.

This could be a driver issue or a MB issue with the 5090 having problems. Guess we just wait and see. Too bad for those that have a broken card, they're the ones that really have to suffer. Hopefully they have a backup GPU they can use for now.
As someone mentioned in the thread it's because of native power management and the fact that the PCIe link speed won't max out without the driver installed.

No Gen 5 GPU products even existed up until now, so on field deployment it's bound to run into issues. Gen 5 PCIe testing equipment in labs is one thing, real world usage likely another beast altogether.
Posted on Reply
#49
LittleBro
AssimilatorThis is such a stupid non-argument. Of course NVIDIA tested it with PCIe 5.0 motherboards, otherwise every man and their dog would be complaining. The fact the latter is not happening should, but apparently hasn't, clue you into the fact that maybe, just maybe, these isolated reports are either user error or incompatibility issues with specific motherboards and their firmware.
Oh, really? And your post is such a valid argument, right? Because of the lack of information on this problem, we can only provide opinions and speculations, just like you did in quoted text above.

You even forgot about the possibility of driver issue to be a culprit here.
HarlowNo doubt there are hundreds, maybe thousands of different motherboard SKUs with a PCIe Gen 5 slot and each board could have many BIOS updates, but how many motherboards does NVidia test before they release a GPU driver update? Do the problems occur mostly on motherboards with an out-of-date BIOS, several years old or is it a hardware problem? I bought my mobo in November 2022 and I'm wondering if I should pass on a PCIe Gen 5 GPU upgrade, even if I update the BIOS.
Keep in mind that PCI-Express is a standard. BIOS is not meant to be updated on regular basis every time a new PCIE expansion card is released. Expansion card is not a processor.

BIOS - if it ain't broken, don't touch/fix it. Same applies to GPU BIOS.

As for your wondering, I had been using PCIE 2.0 board with PCIE 3.0 GPU for years, even my previous PCIE 3.0 board had BIOS version from around 2019 and I ran PCIE 4.0 GPU from 2022 on that board just fine. I only update BIOS when there is security patch involved, when there is added support for newer CPU I'm going to switch to, or when they fix performance-related issue that possibly negatively affected my system (memory speed support - though I do a thorough research here, because sometimes it turns out to be opposite - performance does not get actually improved).
Dr. DroNo Gen 5 GPU products even existed up until now, so on field deployment it's bound to run into issues. Gen 5 PCIe testing equipment in labs is one thing, real world usage likely another beast altogether.
Are you implying that it is normal to cause failures when a first product that supports a new technology arrives? This should have been ironed months before date of release. It's not like they were supposed to do start from a scratch here. PCIE Gen 5.0 standard is known for years. It has exact specifications which are required to be fulfilled in order for a device to be compatible with the standard.

We still don't know whether this problem is related to PCIE 5.0 only. In the article, it is mentioned as one of thought possible causes.
Posted on Reply
#50
AVATARAT
I'm not sure why, but I think in the last few years large corporations have been using end users as beta testers for everything software and hardware. Am I wrong?
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Feb 4th, 2025 20:04 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts