Wednesday, December 25th 2024

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti Final Specifications Seemingly Confirmed

Thanks to kopite7kimi, we are able to finalize the leaked specifications of NVIDIA's upcoming GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti graphics cards.
Starting off with RTX 5070 Ti, it will feature 8,960 CUDA cores and come equipped with 16 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit memory bus, offering 896 GB/s bandwidth. The card is reportedly designed with a total board power (TBP) of 300 W. The Ti variant appears to use the PG147-SKU60 board design with a GB203-300-A1 GPU. The standard RTX 5070 is positioned as a more power-efficient option, with specifications pointing to 6,144 CUDA cores and 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with 627 GB/s memory bandwidth. This model is expected to operate at a slightly lower 250 W TBP.

Interestingly, the non-Ti RTX 5070 card will be available in two board variants, PG146 and PG147, both utilizing the GB205-300-A1 GPU. While we don't know what the pricing structure looks like, we see that NVIDIA has chosen to make more considerable differentiating factors between its SKUs. The Ti variant not only gets an extra four GB of GDDR7 memory, but it also gets a whopping 45% increase in CUDA core count, going from 6,144 to 8,960 cores. While we wait for the CES to see the initial wave of GeForce RTX 50 series cards, the GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti are expected to arrive later, possibly after RTX 5080 and RTX 5090 GPUs.
Sources: @kopite7kimi #1, @kopite7kimi #2
Add your own comment

73 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti Final Specifications Seemingly Confirmed

#1
Macro Device
AleksandarKwith specifications pointing to 6,144 CUDA cores and 12 GB of GDDR7
Unless it runs at stupid high frequencies like 3.75 GHz or more, I don't see how it's gonna be any interesting to buy it. Highly doubt they improved IPC. At 250 W, it's 30 W more than 4070 Super, and at 6144 CUDA cores, it's 15% less SMs than 4070 Super.
5070 Ti smells like what an actual 4070 should've been from the start. But alas.

Still gon hotcake like crazy, no one to contest this unfortunately.
Posted on Reply
#2
Zazigalka
300w doesnt seem as bad as the 350w that was leaked before.
Posted on Reply
#3
THANATOS
Once more only 12GB Vram? Not like I didn't expect It, but still.
Posted on Reply
#4
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
12GB, really? Also looks that there'll be a hella huge gap between 5070 and Ti. I guess they'll release a 5070S later.
Posted on Reply
#5
Legacy-ZA
Oh, this is great news, I was a little apprehensive about the 350W on the 5070Ti, but one could always just undervolt, but then, we would not have known how much performance has been lost yet. Anyways, this is the GPU I am getting.

The 5070 is a 5060Ti, what a shame, the 5070 looks like a massive scam. I would even say the 5080 looks like a scam too, the 5070Ti looks to be well positioned. Well, if the prices are right, or they are all one large scam.
Posted on Reply
#6
Prima.Vera
All the 5000 series looks like a massive scam. Will confirm this later, when the official prices pops out.
Posted on Reply
#7
gffermari
5070 and 12GB ...is not that bad, if nVidia introduce something to compensate.
Otherwise this card will have a hard time in 1440p with RT/PT.
It's bad when a card is fast enough and can deliver but is bottlenecked by VRAM amount.
Posted on Reply
#8
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
gffermari5070 and 12GB ...is not that bad, if nVidia introduce something to compensate.
Otherwise this card will have a hard time in 1440p with RT/PT.
It's bad when a card is fast enough and can deliver but is bottlenecked by VRAM amount.
A new DLSS version? :laugh:

Hilarious that 3060 had 12GB and then that VRAM amount is the 70 models' thing in following generations.
Posted on Reply
#9
gffermari
RuruA new DLSS version? :laugh:

Hilarious that 3060 had 12GB and then that VRAM amount is the 70 models' thing in following generations.
For those who need a nVidia GPU(for CUDA) with loads of memory, the company created the 3060 12GB and 4060Ti 16GB. It never meant to make sense in gaming, since both cards are quite slow anyway and that (usually happened to) come/s first before the vram is out.

My issue is that the 5070 will be able to run most of the games in decent PT settings but the vram will kill it if something is not there to handle the missing vram.
I was watching a vid (Indiana Jones game -
) where in 1440p DLSS Q + FG in PT medium, the vram needed is 14GB+.
It's bad to have a fast card and not enough VRAM for this.

Posted on Reply
#10
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
Nah, they needed to put 12GB on 3060 since they wanted it to have a 192bit bus without that mixed density nonsense.

The later 3060 8GB was a total joke since it was a cut-down card which should've been named as 3050 Ti or something.
Posted on Reply
#11
Roph
12GB 5070 lmao
Posted on Reply
#12
AtiAmd
I hope AMD will release rx 9060 with 4070 ish perfomance at €400 :)
Posted on Reply
#13
Chrispy_
So the cheapest GPU with enough VRAM for 2025 games is probably $900? Great!

Indy being a 2024 title and utterly refusing to work with less than 12GB at launch even without the path-tracing update sets the scene for how much VRAM developers are designing for in 2025. 12GB is the new 8GB - ie, the absolute bare minimum that's only suitable for a short-term solution.
Posted on Reply
#14
mikesg
AMD's 9070/XT is going to catch out Nvidia on price/performance, and naming...

If it's within ~10% of the 5080 and similar $ to the 5070...
Posted on Reply
#15
Pumper
If the 5070 is somewhere in the middle of 4070Ti and 4070TiSuper at 500€, it might be a decent offer.
Posted on Reply
#16
3valatzy
gffermari5070 and 12GB ...is not that bad, if nVidia introduce something to compensate.
Only thing is to decrease the textures resolution, otherwise it will be stutter fest and very low FPS.
Posted on Reply
#17
john_
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX 5070 Ti Performance Stagnation Seemingly Confirmed
Fixed

5070 looks like the definition of performance stagnation. Nvidia increased it's TDP to somewhat balance the lower number of cores compared to 4070 Super. They might need to bring the MSRP down to $499-$549 to not get negative response from gamers. Of course they could try to sell the new exclusive features of 5000 as a generational jump.
5070 Ti looks like a slightly upgraded 4070 Ti Super. I guess MSRP will remain at $800. That could look like a reasonable upgrade today (it would have been a ridiculous joke 10+ years ego waiting 2 years to get 10% performance increase and a couple new features). If Nvidia lowers the MSRP at $700, it will sell better than hot cakes.

Again we see that the more you pay, the better Nvidia treats you.
Posted on Reply
#18
3DVCash
john_5070 Ti looks like a slightly upgraded 4070 Ti Super. I guess MSRP will remain at $800. That could look like a reasonable upgrade today (it would have been a ridiculous joke 10+ years ego waiting 2 years to get 10% performance increase and a couple new features).
Yeah... I built my first PC in the Fermi era and it's pretty wild to really think about how different the market is now vs then. Remember when a new 60-class card routinely matched or outperformed the previous gen's flagship? Nowadays that sounds like crazy talk. :kookoo:
Posted on Reply
#19
3valatzy
3DVCashYeah... I built my first PC in the Fermi era and it's pretty wild to really think about how different the market is now vs then.
I wonder about the profit margins back then and today. Back then Nvidia was a much smaller company, with less turnover, less incomes, less profits, less everything.
3DVCashRemember when a new 60-class card routinely matched or outperformed the previous gen's flagship? Nowadays that sounds like crazy talk. :kookoo:
They can afford to do it now, but the greed rules them all.

Have you noticed how expensive PC gaming in general is. One game such as the DiRT Rally 2.0 costs over $180 with the additional payed packs - every car costs several money, it's crazy.
Posted on Reply
#20
TheDeeGee
Zazigalka300w doesnt seem as bad as the 350w that was leaked before.
Yeh, very similar to the current 4070 Ti.
Posted on Reply
#21
TPUnique
Roph12GB 5070 lmao
nVidia is shameless but ultimately the sheepish customers are to blame...
Posted on Reply
#22
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
TPUniquenVidia is shameless but ultimately the sheepish customers are to blame...
At least I haven't ever bought a NV card new so don't blame me :laugh: and ~5 Radeons bought new. Tens of GPUs anyway since 2004.
Posted on Reply
#23
Nostras
mikesgAMD's 9070/XT is going to catch out Nvidia on price/performance, and naming...

If it's within ~10% of the 5080 and similar $ to the 5070...
We already know the 9070 is going to be close to the GRE which is similar to a 4070 Super, no chance in hell it's going to be in 10% of the 5080.
Posted on Reply
#24
Palladium
3DVCashYeah... I built my first PC in the Fermi era and it's pretty wild to really think about how different the market is now vs then. Remember when a new 60-class card routinely matched or outperformed the previous gen's flagship? Nowadays that sounds like crazy talk. :kookoo:
I got my GTX460 and HD5850 for $110 each, and AAA doesn't sucked as hard then as now.
Posted on Reply
#25
Ruru
S.T.A.R.S.
PalladiumAnd AAA doesn't sucked as hard then as now.
And games were were way better optimized. I had a GTX 470 back then and only its 1280MB VRAM held it back more than its horsepower when I had to upgrade (went for R9 280 3GB as upgrade back in 2014).
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 25th, 2024 15:11 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts