Tuesday, October 16th 2007

Intel’s First Nehalem Processors for Desktops Set to Emerge in Q4 2008.

Intel's code-named Nehalem processors first emerged in long-term Intel's roadmap back in 2002 and, as it turns out now, five years later, the actual chips based on the Nehalem micro-architecture will emerge in the fourth quarter of 2008. But one thing those initial Nehalem processors not expected to deliver is integrated graphics core.

Intel's Nehalem processors are based on the brand new micro-architecture that is not only more efficient and advanced compared to Intel Core 2, it is also feature a new multi-threading technology, which will allow to virtually double the amount of cores available. But besides integrated memory controller and a new type of processor bus called Intel Quick Path Interconnect (QPI), the Nehalem promises very high customizability. For example, Intel can add a built-in graphics core into Nehalem central processing units and alter the number of memory controller channels besides changing the number of operating processing engines.

The first implementation of Nehalem micro-architecture will be code-named Intel Bloomfield central processing unit (CPU), according to sources familiar with Intel Corp.'s plans. The chip will have two or four cores, depending on positioning, and will be able to process up to eight threads simultaneously thanks to a technology similar to Intel's Hyper-Threading.


thank you dom_ati for finding this
Source: X-Bit Labs
Add your own comment

17 Comments on Intel’s First Nehalem Processors for Desktops Set to Emerge in Q4 2008.

#1
magibeg
Man, thats such a long wait. I hate announcements so far in advance because i'm already looking at what i could have in the future so anything out there now isn't good enough. So its actually 4 cores with crazy hyper threading to make it think 8 cores?
Posted on Reply
#2
Unregistered
wow,intels gunning for top dawg.

onboard mem controller too,very nice.be nice to see fugger get his hands on one of them.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#3
kwchang007
Snap, Intel's throwing all the know-how it has. So from this, Intel is saying they can easily add cores and do other stuff? Then also they got they're own version of Fusion going on....I wanna see some benchies from this.
Posted on Reply
#4
Unregistered
intel is big,and it is clever.they dont seem to disclose new stuff till they have working examples,so who knows what stuff they're working on we dont even know about.i dont particularly prefer intel or amd,i just want fast and cheap.intel do seem to be popping out some nice new shieet tho'.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#5
wiak
deja vu anyone?
since AMD released Opteron in 2003 ^^
Posted on Reply
#6
TheGuruStud
wiakdeja vu anyone?
since AMD released Opteron in 2003 ^^
Intel announced when they were working on IMC and CSI. It was about 2 yrs ago I think.

It either proves how reluctant they are to change or how dumb they are.
Posted on Reply
#7
Chewy
Anyone know if this is going to use a new socket? maybe I'll get another duel core for now and wait for this uber core cpu.. I have a feeling this wont be socket 775.
Posted on Reply
#8
TheGuruStud
ChewyAnyone know if this is going to use a new socket? maybe I'll get another duel core for now and wait for this uber core cpu.. I have a feeling this wont be socket 775.
LOL, are you serious... How many pins does AMD have for a dual-channel mem controller and HTT links? Okay, there's your answer.
Posted on Reply
#9
Chewy
Im a newb man lol. I take it I'll need a new motherboard :P

PS: but I take it this might just be worth saving an upgrade for! Always AN UPGRADE! LOL... guess i'll stick with a 45nm quad and be happy for a long tme. :)
Posted on Reply
#10
TheGuruStud
ChewyIm a newb man lol. I take it I'll need a new motherboard :P

PS: but I take it this might just be worth saving an upgrade for! Always AN UPGRADE! LOL... guess i'll stick with a 45nm quad and be happy for a long tme. :)
haha, sorry. I can be a little harsh. I wonder if it would be possible if there was enough pins though. Like a BIOS update that adds support (of course it would still have to use FSB somehow, which is pointless then) and disables the north bridge mem controller. Probably take longer to figure that out than to design a MB for the new CPU haha.
Posted on Reply
#11
Kursah
This looks promising, we'll see what Intel and AMD have on the table near Q4 2008. I don't plan on upgrading really anything except for video for a while. The rest of my system is doing quite well, if anything, another 2GB of RAM and some more HDD Room, but my system runs cool and I'm happy with 2 cores at 3.5GHz.

Definately looking forward to seeing these be released, reviewed, OC'd, etc! I hope they have varying models without the Integrated Graphics when they do support and release it on-chip. I wonder how that would affect overclocking...
Posted on Reply
#12
Unregistered
i'm quite happy with my system for a while too,i can chuck a penryn in it next year for a bit more go.

b.o.t,i'm not too keen on the intergrated graphics.depending how powerful it is,its gonna make oc'ing and cooling it tricky.hot cpu=hot gpu and vise versa.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#13
WarEagleAU
Bird of Prey
thats a huge amount of changes done from the C2D and the roadmap from 5 years ago to today. Amazing what all they are planning with it. I hate to admit it, but Im starting to like Intels swaggerish style :)
Posted on Reply
#14
mdm-adph
WarEagleAUthats a huge amount of changes done from the C2D and the roadmap from 5 years ago to today. Amazing what all they are planning with it. I hate to admit it, but Im starting to like Intels swaggerish style :)
Aye, if they were always like this, no matter what their market position was, I could like 'em, too. The Core 2 is an amazing processor, no matter who you're a fan of.

And eight cores on a single 45nm platform? Hell, if AMD has nothing to match it when those chips hit the market, I'll buy four and make me my own personal supercomputer and not look back.

However, the reality (as I see it) is sad -- give Intel a few years of market dominance, and their R&D drops to nill. Nada. Zip.
Posted on Reply
#15
Deleted member 3
mdm-adphHowever, the reality (as I see it) is sad -- give Intel a few years of market dominance, and their R&D drops to nill. Nada. Zip.
Happened once in the past 30 years, what makes you think it'll happen again any time soon?
Posted on Reply
#16
mdm-adph
DanTheBanjomanHappened once in the past 30 years, what makes you think it'll happen again any time soon?
To quote Michael Douglas: "Greeeeeeeed."
Posted on Reply
#17
effmaster
Wow so Intel is finally going to use the same Extremely advanced Hyper threading technology that the Xbox 360 uses (the 360 has 3 real cores with each containing an extra virtual core for a total of 6) So we will finally see a processor with more cores than the 360 released to the mass market yayyy Intel :laugh::laugh::laugh:(I dont consider the cell to be a mass market proc simply because we cant put it in our computers if we wished to)


Now I can agree without a shadow of a doubt that the 360 has finally been overtaken in Graphics potential compared to a computer:toast::toast::toast:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jun 29th, 2024 17:09 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts