What's the point now? You can find the 8800 GT for around 200$.

WeerWhat's the point now? You can find the 8800 GT for around 200$.

A little more than $200, but I see your point. I suppose the extra A/V features over the 8800GT might be on somebody's wish list.

Wonder why they decided on one 8-pin pci-e plug...that's kind of odd imo. I wonder how well these will clock using the stock cooler in comparison to Pro's/XT's. Could be a good buy if the price point is right. Interesting find Malware.

malwareNo information available on core and memory clock speeds. Price in Thailand should be around $195.

600MHz core, 800MHz memory. Price 150-170€

geizhals.at/eu/a289811.html

more info on Club 3D model.
www.club3d.nl/index.php/products/graphics/item/292

Wile EA little more than $200, but I see your point. I suppose the extra A/V features over the 8800GT might be on somebody's wish list.

The list price is 200$ for the 512MB version.
But the 256MB version, which is directly comparable to this card, should be 200$ or less.
So, it the 8800 GT would actually be somewhat cheaper than this.

I just wonder what nVidia is thinking of doing with the 8800 GTX/Ultra now that the 8800 GT is out.

Dropping the price :)?


They don't have to do anything. As long as the newer GTS doesn't outperform it, then they'll probably forego making a revised version.

IMO, nowadays, 256MB is just too small ammount of mem to put your money into it. :/ We can see 320MB cards struggling hard with little higher resolutions/detail in newer products. What is the point?

WeerWhat's the point now? You can find the 8800 GT for around 200$.

Where:confused:

How does this compare to 8800 GT in performance?

I can order this card in Canada for $179CAD so that price quoted is definitely higher than it should be.

CashetiHow does this compare to 8800 GT in performance?

It doesn't, as HD 2900 XT even can't. It does however close the gap between HD 2600 XT and HD 2900 PRO/XT. Now if HD 3800 series would be aimed in that cap, this would just be a real silly card, so they have to be faster. HD 3850 might be close to HD 2900 XT speed and HD 3870 over it and compeate with 8800 GT.

Here's 8800 GT vs. HD 2900 XT comparison:
www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3140&p=10

Man, this has been getting really confusing lately. Who here thinks that the 8800gt should have actually been an 8900gt? That would have made life so much easier, now nothing makes sense.

magibegMan, this has been getting really confusing lately. Who here thinks that the 8800gt should have actually been an 8900gt? That would have made life so much easier, now nothing makes sense.

Yeah, I agree wich ya.

CashetiHow does this compare to 8800 GT in performance?

I also wonder about the HD 2900GT performance when compared to the Geforce 8800 GT

OnBoardIt doesn't, as HD 2900 XT even can't. It does however close the gap between HD 2600 XT and HD 2900 PRO/XT. Now if HD 3800 series would be aimed in that cap, this would just be a real silly card, so they have to be faster. HD 3850 might be close to HD 2900 XT speed and HD 3870 over it and compeate with 8800 GT.

Here's 8800 GT vs. HD 2900 XT comparison:
www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3140&p=10

Yea, gives scalar to compare with, but what about the HD 2900 XT compared with the HD 2900 GT?

musekIMO, nowadays, 256MB is just too small ammount of mem to put your money into it. :/ We can see 320MB cards struggling hard with little higher resolutions/detail in newer products. What is the point?

Great point,..512 should be minimum on a card nowadays.

i dont think this one will be flashable to xt speeds :(

Oh boy it looks just like the HD 2900XT...and the HD 2900Pro... :p.

No surprise given it beats out every other Nvidia card, save the GTX and Ultra, but even then, it wins some benches and goes nose to nose and toe to toe with it. This is the card Nvidia wanted from the get go, and a card, that I as an AMD/ATI fanboy, want ATI to produce <G>

OnBoardIt doesn't, as HD 2900 XT even can't. It does however close the gap between HD 2600 XT and HD 2900 PRO/XT. Now if HD 3800 series would be aimed in that cap, this would just be a real silly card, so they have to be faster. HD 3850 might be close to HD 2900 XT speed and HD 3870 over it and compeate with 8800 GT.

Here's 8800 GT vs. HD 2900 XT comparison:
www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3140&p=10

Might want to re-check that...
The 2900xt beats the 8800GTS 640 in most cases, and in benchmarks holds the top 5 world records still, over the 8800Ultras..

You are getting so close here that its all application dependent.
PS- I would LOVE to see an 8800GT perform on par with a 2900XT in say 1920x1200...

IIRC, something about ATi architecture somewhat 'limits' their cards to either 256 or 512MB - not saying their cards couldn't handle more, but that they perform and utilize these memory sizes best - at least, when compared to nVs 320 and 640 setups. We can see on-par or better performance, plus better visuals, at lower clock speeds and with less memory on ATi cards.


I'm glad to see ATI expanding their HD2ks lineup so quickly, though.

WeerI just wonder what nVidia is thinking of doing with the 8800 GTX/Ultra now that the 8800 GT is out.

Let morons who don't research before they buy take them. There are plenty of those people out there.

erockerLet morons who don't research before they buy take them. There are plenty of those people out there.

clear teh shelves! ...

Everything turns Nvidia... AMD, nobody wants your 2900GT. I am a fan too!:(

erockerEverything turns Nvidia... AMD, nobody wants your 2900GT. I am a fan too!:(

Eh, I have thought about getting 2 of them.... But I am still waiting, hopefully something will come out I can actually look at and go hmm ya that looks good...

save your monies ... but buy a next ATi card ...