Saturday, August 30th 2008

Thermalright HR-03 GTX kit Pictured

Thermalright is releasing a variant of the HR-03 VGA cooling kit that supports the GeForce GTX 200 series graphics cards called the HR-03 GTX. The kit consists of the main heatsink unit, heatsinks over the memory, a heatsink for the card's VRM area and a heatsink over the NVIO2 processor. The main GPU heatsink is essentially the same as the HR-03 except for modifications of the portion that makes contact with the GPU and the heatpipe configuration. Although the HR-03 series kits were meant to provide silent cooling to graphics cards, the manufacturers of this cooler insist you install an additional fan using provided retention clips.
Source: Hardspell
Add your own comment

47 Comments on Thermalright HR-03 GTX kit Pictured

#26
PP Mguire
Full card blocks with trifan rad means you can still have a single slot solution and cool better than air.
Posted on Reply
#27
trt740
PP MguireFull card blocks with trifan rad means you can still have a single slot solution and cool better than air.
not all water cooling is better than these thermalrights
Posted on Reply
#28
blobster21
since it's not totally off topic, please find enclosed more photos of these heatsinks in a dual configuration :









A radial 12 cm fan blowing across the heatpipes add some serious security margin for any further overclock...

hope this help :)
Posted on Reply
#29
alexp999
Staff
Dont they have anything for the back Ram chips with this? Or are you just supposed to leave the stock metal plate in place. :confused:
Posted on Reply
#30
tkpenalty
blobster21since it's not totally off topic, please find enclosed more photos of these heatsinks in a dual configuration :









A radial 12 cm fan blowing across the heatpipes add some serious security margin for any further overclock...

hope this help :)
U know you can route that 8 pin/4pin 12v ATX wire under the GPUs instead of over everything....?
Posted on Reply
#31
REVHEAD
tkpenaltyU know you can route that 8 pin/4pin 12v ATX wire under the GPUs instead of over everything....?
Umm I dont think he is stupud, why bother its only æsthetic anyway, looks like he has better things on his mind..
Posted on Reply
#32
blobster21
tkpenaltyU know you can route that 8 pin/4pin 12v ATX wire under the GPUs instead of over everything....?
yup, but the cable you're talking about is definately too short to do that, this is the only way to reach the 4pins molex hidden behind the noctua HS, i wish there was a workaround though.
Posted on Reply
#34
Wile E
Power User
PP MguireFull card blocks with trifan rad means you can still have a single slot solution and cool better than air.
Full card blocks actually perform worse than universal blocks. They dump the heat from the mem and vregs into the loop, lowering your gpu clock. Sure, you might be able to squeeze some extra out of the mem, but the gpu speed is infinitely more important that the mem speed.

As for a point of reference in the water vs air debate, my card loop consists of a Maze5 GPU block, MCP-350 Pump, MicroRes, and a Swiftech MCR-120 120mm rad with a Silverstone FM-121 fan, all with 3/8" fittings. In a room temp of 21C, I reach a temp of 42C running Furmark, with a vGPU of 1.7V. At stock volts, it peaks at 33C.
Posted on Reply
#35
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
thats why you want a separate memblock and a separate GPU Block.
Posted on Reply
#37
Hayder_Master
blobster21since it's not totally off topic, please find enclosed more photos of these heatsinks in a dual configuration :









A radial 12 cm fan blowing across the heatpipes add some serious security margin for any further overclock...

hope this help :)
you put your staff in dell system case right , i know it cuz i see the mobo is upside down , i have two dell case too im thinking about mod it , nothing better than dell cases but only problem is main case door the right side that is mean when you put other mobo everything be inverse
Posted on Reply
#38
Wile E
Power User
hayder.masteryou put your staff in dell system case right , i know it cuz i see the mobo is upside down , i have two dell case too im thinking about mod it
Nope, that's a CM Stacker 830 or 832. You can reverse mount the mobo tray in those. I ran mine that way for quite a while.
Posted on Reply
#39
blobster21
Wile E is right, it's written down on my specs ;)
Posted on Reply
#40
trt740
hayder.masteryou put your staff in dell system case right , i know it cuz i see the mobo is upside down , i have two dell case too im thinking about mod it , nothing better than dell cases but only problem is main case door the right side that is mean when you put other mobo everything be inverse
who cares anyways it looks great. :D:roll:
Posted on Reply
#41
PP Mguire
Sure, you might be able to squeeze some extra out of the mem, but the gpu speed is infinitely more important that the mem speed.
On my card ive had more benefiet from clocking my memory high. Its probably the opposite to you because you have alot more mem than me. So really it all depends on the card. My old 7950GT got more of a boost from clocking the core than ram cause it had 512mb.
Posted on Reply
#42
Wile E
Power User
PP MguireOn my card ive had more benefiet from clocking my memory high. Its probably the opposite to you because you have alot more mem than me. So really it all depends on the card. My old 7950GT got more of a boost from clocking the core than ram cause it had 512mb.
No, even with your card, I guaranty that a 50Mhz core OC will score higher than a 50Mhz mem clock. Once you pass a certain point on the mem on that card, it is no longer a bottleneck. That point can generally be achieved without h2o cooling. And even if it is a bottleneck, raising the core will still provide increases.
Posted on Reply
#43
PP Mguire
Its still better to keep everything nice and cool if your going that route. And, there is no difference between 700 and 750mhz core right now. When i cranked the ram from 950 to 1050 though there was a big improvement.
Posted on Reply
#44
Wile E
Power User
PP MguireIts still better to keep everything nice and cool if your going that route. And, there is no difference between 700 and 750mhz core right now. When i cranked the ram from 950 to 1050 though there was a big improvement.
What did you use to verify that? No testing on any video card I have ever done, or that my teamate with the GSO's has done, shows any trend like that at all. The core always does more. My guess would be that you need a little more gpu vcore to run 750Mhz properly. That can make a huge difference, trust me. I can run 900Mhz in 3Dmark 06 at 1.55V, but I score much lower than when I run the same speed at 1.7V.

And my point about full coverage block is that you sacrifice gpu cooling for better ram cooling, when just making sure you have good airflow and ram sinks would do just as well in the ram clocking department as far as scores are concerned. Because all you need to do is ease the bottleneck. It doesn't take much to accomplish that.
Posted on Reply
#45
PP Mguire
Just playing games and watching the FPS. In high graphic games there wasnt as much of a dip when clocking my ram up but almost little or no difference when going from 700 to 750.
Posted on Reply
#46
Das Capitolin
Another failed Thermalright product concept

I don't follow their logic: spend a lot of time to remove the stock cooling from you GTX 280 and potentially void a warranty, then add a whole bunch of nickel (heat-retaining) heatpipe components to your video card, and then add a fan. Oh- by the way, we won't include a fan. Also- you've just used two additional slots.

You've just paid more, got less, and will likely void a warranty in the process. Goodie.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Dec 23rd, 2024 18:02 EST change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts