Tuesday, April 28th 2009

Radeon HD 4770 Released, Industry's First 40 nm GPU

AMD today released the ATI Radeon HD 4770 graphics card. The release marks several milestones for the company, mainly winning the race for the first GPU to be built on the 40 nm process, and the introduction second-generation GDDR5 memory for the mainstream consumer segment.

The brains of this card is the 40 nm AMD RV740 GPU. Its specifications include 640 stream processors that churn out over 900 GFLOPs of shader compute power, 32 texture memory units, and 16 render back-ends. The GPU is aided by 512 MB of fast GDDR5 memory across a 128-bit wide interface. This provides the same amount of bandwidth as 256-bit GDDR3 commonly found in most graphics card in the range. The card is DirectX 10.1 compliant, and supports the ATI CrossFireX multi-GPU standard.

The card has been launched worldwide, with its initial US price set at $109, and an optional rebate that can send its price further down. In its range, it competes with NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT, and AMD's own Radeon HD 4830. TechPowerUp is one of the first technology portals to publish a thorough review of the Radeon HD 4770. Our review can be read here.
Add your own comment

38 Comments on Radeon HD 4770 Released, Industry's First 40 nm GPU

#26
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
ktrThat is shockingly impressive. You can get two 4770 cheaper than a 4890 and be 20% faster...

I may just found my next pair of graphic cards (if I get around building a new rig).
What's more, it even beats GeForce GTX 285 according to this review.
Posted on Reply
#27
ktr
btarunrWhat's more, it even beats GeForce GTX 285 according to this review.
:twitch::eek::twitch:

Again...very impressive crossfire performance.
Posted on Reply
#28
Polarman
Not bad at all for CFX. But i'm still keeping my 4890. :p
Posted on Reply
#29
BrooksyX
Hmm very tempted to sell my 4830 and pick up one or two of these. However my 4830 is an OCing beast and I don't know if I could pull the same numbers with a 4770. Probably not worth the extra cash to upgrade.

Does anyone know if these are coming in 1gb variants?
Posted on Reply
#30
djisas
BrooksyXHmm very tempted to sell my 4830 and pick up one or two of these. However my 4830 is an OCing beast and I don't know if I could pull the same numbers with a 4770. Probably not worth the extra cash to upgrade.

Does anyone know if these are coming in 1gb variants?
I heard only reference 512MB cards for a while, also heard AMD does not want oc cards, yet...
A couple of months i suppose there might be custom designs with performance passing 4850 with all the little things that make ocers happy...
Posted on Reply
#31
nafets
Nice to see ATI still hasn't figured out how to properly downclock the GDDR5 memory in 2D IDLE.

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

The card could be a supreme 2D IDLE low power contender if they reigned in the memory clocks. Way to go useless PowerPlay! Enable driver-based state switching (like the HD4870X2), and there would be power savings galore.

Well smart users can still do the underclocking themselves. It works but it's not automatic. :(
Posted on Reply
#32
my_name_is_earl
I wish all the graphic card has silkscreen printing, it look much nicer than the paper sticker. that black colored blower look noticeably better than red. Maybe I'm just sick of seeing red blower.
Posted on Reply
#33
Steevo
Everything I am seeing with these cards points to them being bandwidth starved. ATI should have put a on die cache on these.
Posted on Reply
#34
Steevo
nafetsNice to see ATI still hasn't figured out how to properly downclock the GDDR5 memory in 2D IDLE.

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

The card could be a supreme 2D IDLE low power contender if they reigned in the memory clocks. Way to go useless PowerPlay! Enable driver-based state switching (like the HD4870X2), and there would be power savings galore.

Well smart users can still do the underclocking themselves. It works but it's not automatic. :(
I have issues in Windows 7 with the driver based switching, it switches too fast sometimes and the core is still at high when the voltage just drops off the face of the earth and the driver sucess rate for recovery is about 60% currently. It is borking my overclocks :(
Posted on Reply
#35
nafets
SteevoI have issues in Windows 7 with the driver based switching, it switches too fast sometimes and the core is still at high when the voltage just drops off the face of the earth and the driver sucess rate for recovery is about 60% currently. It is borking my overclocks :(
What card are you using?
Posted on Reply
#37
W1zzard
SteevoEverything I am seeing with these cards points to them being bandwidth starved. ATI should have put a on die cache on these.
all recent gpus have on die cache. how can it be bandwidth starved if it has the same bandwidth as a hd 4850 (assuming same memory clock)
Posted on Reply
#38
Hayder_Master
so ATI do same NVIDIA falls but they cure it quick , they must release all 4770 with 40nm
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Aug 15th, 2024 11:20 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts