- Joined
- Jan 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,440 (3.27/day)
System Name | Good enough |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge |
Motherboard | ASRock B650 Pro RS |
Cooling | 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30 |
Memory | 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora |
Storage | 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB |
Display(s) | LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV |
Case | Phanteks NV7 |
Power Supply | GPS-750C |
Shhh please, stop making a fool out of yourself and showing us how ignorant you are, my statements are clear: Geometry (polygon + tessellation) performance on FuryX is bad, that's why it sucks in most of these games, you are the one confusing Geometry Shaders with fill rate with polygons. Basically your understanding of tech is that of a potato.
The only fanboy here is the people trying to disprove numbers and benchmarks results with pathetic reasoning and faulty info. Numbers don't lie. But you guys will for sure.
WOW! Please enlighten us as to how!
You and the other grand total of 2 other people that share the same opinion with you on this matter have been shown a plethora of evidence, repeatedly by several people that this thread is nothing more than a witch hunt after an "issue" that isn't backed up by any concrete evidence or anything that we didn't already knew for years.
But carry on with the endless spamming of the same flawed chart/numbers and made up facts that you love so much.
Last edited: