• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

FineWine===>FineVinegar FuryX Aging Horrible in 2017

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 50521
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
MuhammedAbdo said:
Shhh please, stop making a fool out of yourself and showing us how ignorant you are, my statements are clear: Geometry (polygon + tessellation) performance on FuryX is bad, that's why it sucks in most of these games, you are the one confusing Geometry Shaders with fill rate with polygons. Basically your understanding of tech is that of a potato.

The only fanboy here is the people trying to disprove numbers and benchmarks results with pathetic reasoning and faulty info. Numbers don't lie. But you guys will for sure.


WOW! Please enlighten us as to how!
Click to expand...

You and the other grand total of 2 other people that share the same opinion with you on this matter have been shown a plethora of evidence, repeatedly by several people that this thread is nothing more than a witch hunt after an "issue" that isn't backed up by any concrete evidence or anything that we didn't already knew for years.

But carry on with the endless spamming of the same flawed chart/numbers and made up facts that you love so much.
 
Last edited:
Let's all stop with the back and forth about who is right and who is wrong. Post on the topic while being civil is all we ask! Thread closure eminent unless the tone drastically changes.
 
Have not regretted a single highend card purchase. that includes the 2900XT and X1800XT (as well as GTX 480 SLI for NV side)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
recently side stepped from rx480 8bg x2 in crossfire to a fury x and really glad i did, seems to perform really well in all games i play.
 
HD64G said:
Thanks for the info. Didn't know about that. Fury isn't so much neglected from the AMD driver team then. HBM OC needs to be re-enabled and some newer games need to be optimised to get on par to Polaris and Vega archs. And VR also for some people who use that need to be done better.
Click to expand...

The fact is they really have NOT been optimizing the Fiji arc since even Polaris launch.

Never emotionally invest in a brand like me. That clouded my judgment back then. :(

Only spend your $$$ based on a multitude of reviews. And don't count on promises like "FineWine"

I'm saving up money to get another GPU. Hopefully Ampree will drop soon.
 
xkm1948 said:
The fact is they really have NOT been optimizing the Fiji arc since even Polaris launch.

Never emotionally invest in a brand like me. That clouded my judgment back then. :(

Only spend your $$$ based on a multitude of reviews. And don't count on promises like "FineWine"

I'm saving up money to get another GPU. Hopefully Ampree will drop soon.
Click to expand...
Your advice about emotion when buying products is golden. Without facts no one should buy anything. Thing is sometimes products seem great at first and after months or years of use you are sure about their true value. Happens frequently with all of us eh?
 
Both teams have their own share of problems, no one's a saint.
 
xkm1948 said:
The fact is they really have NOT been optimizing the Fiji arc since even Polaris launch. [bold added by "ikeke"]

Never emotionally invest in a brand like me. That clouded my judgment back then. :(

Only spend your $$$ based on a multitude of reviews. And don't count on promises like "FineWine"

I'm saving up money to get another GPU. Hopefully Ampree will drop soon.
Click to expand...

Polaris launch @29th June 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_400_series

Now, that's a strong emotional statement, got any proof to go with it?

(the proof would need to show that there has been negative or zero improvement in games for AMD Fiji uarch GPUs since 29th June 2016)

I'll give you a hint:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480/
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_1070_Ti_FTW2/
 
Last edited:
ikeke said:
Polaris launch @29th June 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Radeon_400_series

Now, that's a strong emotional statement, got any proof to go with it?

(the proof would need to show that there has been negative or zero improvement in games for AMD Fiji uarch GPUs since 29th June 2016)

I'll give you a hint:
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480/
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/EVGA/GTX_1070_Ti_FTW2/
Click to expand...


You do know TPU's review do not re-test older cards for every new GPU release right? I suggest you take a look at newer game title reviews that test specifically how each GPU performs in newer titles.

I will give you some hints:

https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Call_Of_Duty_WW_II/4.html
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Middle_Earth_Shadow_of_War/5.html
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Destiny_2_Beta/4.html
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Hellblade_Senuas_Sacrifice/4.html
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Performance_Analysis/Prey/4.html


My proof is the performance I am having as a owner, as well as new features support I am seeing as a owner of a FuryX owner.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top