- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
- Messages
- 16,206 (6.83/day)
- Location
- Midlands, UK
System Name | My second and third PCs are Intel + Nvidia |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D @ 45 W TDP Eco Mode |
Motherboard | MSi Pro B650M-A Wifi |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U9S chromax.black push+pull |
Memory | 2x 24 GB Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 CL36 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 XT |
Storage | 2 TB Corsair MP600 GS, 4 TB Seagate Barracuda |
Display(s) | Dell S3422DWG 34" 1440 UW 144 Hz |
Case | Corsair Crystal 280X |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech Z333 2.1 speakers, AKG Y50 headphones |
Power Supply | 750 W Seasonic Prime GX |
Mouse | Logitech MX Master 2S |
Keyboard | Logitech G413 SE |
Software | Bazzite (Fedora Linux) KDE Plasma |
For me, it's not that it's a bad experience. It's more like the fact that the benefits of RAM OC and fine-tuning are undetectable in basically every program in existence, except for maybe the AIDA64 memory benchmark. Unless chasing numbers is your hobby, RAM OC is utterly pointless, imo.sounds like you just haven't found the right kits and platforms for it
Stuff becomes habit but I can understand why a particularly unlucky or bad experience puts new users off of AMD forever. There's so much time wasting crap now, CO and limits, X3D driver stuff for 2CCD, RAM, optimize Windows......for us picky people we can eventually appreciate that some things are more nuanced than "AMD bad" but the average user is not interested